Social Cognition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Cognition

Description:

However, data on depressive realism suggests that's okay! ... Subway game at Yankee Stadium. People who share birthday. Need for Control ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Raymon
Category:
Tags: cognition | social

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Cognition


1
Social Cognition
  • Chapter 8 Shortcomings and Biases in Person
    Perception

2
Person Perception if Motivated
  • Need to maintain a positive sense of self.
  • May contradict accuracy needs.
  • However, data on depressive realism suggests
    thats okay!!
  • (1) Unrealistically positive views of the self
    (positive illusions).
  • Self-serving bias attributional style where
    success is attributed internally and failure
    externally.

3
Shelters from Negative Info
  • Social norms feedback is generally positive
    (this is why mentors are evil!)
  • Similarity theory in attraction.
  • People tend to interpret ambigous feedback
    positively.
  • Ability to denigrate the source of unavoidable
    negative feedback.
  • Motivated skepticism tendency to critically
    examine information we dont like but to be
    uncritical of self-affirming information.

4
Cognitive Dissonance Reduction
  • Negative information about self is dissonant with
    self image. Reduce by
  • Recruiting cognitions that are consistent with
    discrepancy (yes, I failed, but I tried)
  • Change ones attitude so that cognitions are no
    longer discrepant (sure I failed, the task is
    impossible!).
  • Affirm self through thoughts in unrelated domain.
  • Trivialization, denigration, etc.

5
Defensive Pessimism vs. Self-Handicapping
  • Defensive pessimism expect the worst and thus
    prepare like mad to avoid it.
  • Self-handicapping create and external
    attribution for ones failure.

6
(2) Unrealistic Optimism about the future
  • Partially fueled by critical skepticism.
  • Danger is that we may risk health!
  • Affective forecasting we seem inaccurate at
    predicting impact of events.
  • Durability bias seem to believe that impact will
    last longer than it actually does.

7
Implicit Self-Esteem
  • Tendency to evaluate things associated with self
    more positively than things not linked to self.
  • Letters in name
  • Subway game at Yankee Stadium
  • People who share birthday.

8
Need for Control
  • Heider asserted that we lean toward dispositional
    explanations for control reasons.
  • Exaggerated perceptions of personal control
  • Illusion of control (dice throwing, lottery tix)
  • Self-verification theory
  • Evaluate self in ways that verify existing views
    of self (a form of control).
  • Just world theory scary if bad things happen to
    good people!

9
Social Identity Theory and Group Biases
  • Historical antecedents include Cooleys looking
    glass self and Meads concept of the significant
    symbol.
  • Social Identity Theory our self-esteem is linked
    to the social groups to which we belong.
  • Group enhancement occurs through attribution
    patterns that mimic the fundamental attribution
    error
  • Pettigrew labeled this the ultimate attribution
    error.

10
Ingratiation
  • Interesting paradox concerning the dislike of
    ingratiation techniques considering their
    ubiquity and ties to the basic need for
    affiliation.

11
Egocentric Perception
  • Metaperception, metacognition an theory of mind.
  • Egocentric communication
  • We forget to take others perspective and thus
    screw up communication.

12
Embracing Negative Information
  • Despite our preference for positive information
    it doesnt mean we ignore negative. In fact.
  • Cacioppo and Berntson suggest separate
    neurophysiological structures for positive and
    negative information.
  • Negative information is more informative and
    diagnostic.
  • We are risk averse unless we expect to lose
    then we go for it!

13
Accuracy
  • We arent always wrong!
  • The more it matters the more pragmatic accuracy
    stands a chance.
  • People are accurate predictors when the persons
    being predicted are confined to important
    relationships and the qualites being judged are
    relevant to those relationships.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com