IEEESA Standards Board - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

IEEESA Standards Board

Description:

PatCom is exploring a number of proposed changes to the procedures and LOA ... Howard Wolfman. Dave Ringle (Secretary) 2006 Standards Board Committees. NesCom ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: IEE6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IEEESA Standards Board


1
IEEE-SA Standards Board Chairmans Report to the
IEEE-SA Standards Board
30 March 2006 Piscataway, NJ
Chair Steve Mills steve.mills_at_hp.com Secretary
Judy Gorman j.gorman_at_ieee.org Administrator Rona
Gertz r.gertz_at_ieee.org
2
2005 SASB Summary
  • Last SASB meeting series was held on 5-7
    December, 2005
  • Year to date
  • RevCom recommended approval of
  • 34 projects as new standards
  • 42 revisions of standards
  • 36 reaffirmations of existing standards
  • NesCom recommended approval of
  • 81 new PARs
  • 25 modified PARs
  • 57 revision PARs
  • 61 PAR extensions. (Includes conditional
    approvals)
  • 48 Withdrawals
  • PatCom is exploring a number of proposed changes
    to the procedures and LOA
  • ProCom launched two ad hocs to explore
    interpretations and to examine the definition of
    interest categories

3
2006 SASB Summary
  • Year to date
  • RevCom recommended approval of
  • 6 projects as new standards
  • 9 revisions of standards
  • 25 reaffirmations of existing standards
  • NesCom recommended approval of
  • 17 new PARs
  • 6 modified PARs
  • 13 revision PARs
  • 8 PAR extensions. (Includes conditional
    approvals)
  • 8 Withdrawals
  • PatCom is continuing to explore changes to the
    procedures and LOA
  • ProCom will address the tasks of incorporating
    the requirement for declaration of affiliation
    into the procedures and defining procedures for
    issues relating to dominance when identified
  • AudCom will publish the accepted PPs on their
    website and maintain these as the official
    versions of the sponsors PPs

4
2006 Standards Board
  • Chair Steve Mills
  • Past SASB Chair Don Wright
  • Vice Chair Elected by SASB
  • Reappointments    Mark BowmanDennis
    BrophyJoanna GueninMark HalpinBill HopfRich
    HulettDavid LawDaleep MohlaTed OlsenGlenn
    ParsonsRon PetersenMalcolm ThadenRick
    TownsendHoward Wolfman
  • TAB Rep Virginia Sulzberger
  • New  Bill GoldbachArnie GreenspanBob GrowKen
    HanusTom PrevostGreg RattaRobby
    RobsonAnne-Marie SahazizianWalter Weigel

5
2006 Standards Board Committees
  • AudCom
  • Daleep Mohla (Chair)
  • Ron Petersen
  • Gary Robinson
  • Howard Wolfman
  • Bob Davis
  • Arnie Greenspan
  • Rona Gertz (Secretary)
  • PatCom
  • Don Wright (Chair)
  • Dennis Brophy
  • David Law
  • Chuck Adams
  • Rich Hulett
  • Rick Townsend
  • Dave Ringle (Secretary)
  • ProCom
  • Rich Hulett (Chair)
  • Daleep Mohla
  • Malcolm Thaden
  • Bob Grow
  • Greg Ratta
  • Glenn Parsons
  • Howard Wolfman
  • Dave Ringle (Secretary)

6
2006 Standards Board Committees
  • NesCom
  • Ron Petersen (Chair)
  • Joanna Guenin
  • Mark Halpin
  • Ken Hanus
  • William Hopf
  • Hermann Koch
  • Ted Olsen
  • Glenn Parsons
  • Anne Marie Sahazizian
  • Rick Townsend
  • Ken Kousky
  • Narayanan Ramachandran
  • Robby Robson
  • Jon Rosdahl
  • Jodi Haasz (Secretary)
  • RevCom
  • Malcolm Thaden (Chair)
  • Satish Aggarwal
  • Mark Bowman
  • Dennis Brophy
  • Bill Goldbach
  • David Law
  • Gary Robinson
  • Stephen Adam
  • John Trottier
  • Jim Hughes
  • Tom Prevost
  • Geoff Thompson
  • Walter Weigel
  • Dave Ringle (Secretary)

7
802.11i/WAPI Status
  • The ISO/IEC JTC1 fast track ballots for J1N7903
    (802.11i) and J1N7904 (WAPI) closed on 7 March
    2006
  • J1N7903 (802.11i) passed
  • J1N7904 (WAPI) failed
  • A comment resolution meeting will be held during
    the week of 5 June 2006
  • This comment resolution meeting will address
    comments received on both documents

8
PatCom Next Steps (1)
  • PatCom has been tasked to complete its current
    work items by the end of their September meeting
  • The SASB should expect that PatCom
    recommendations will be presented to the SASB
    during the September meeting
  • The SASB should begin preparing now and be ready
    to consider these recommendations during the
    September meeting
  • A subsequent 30-day letter ballot will be issued
    immediately following the meeting

9
PatCom Next Steps (2)
  • If the recommendations are approved by the SASB,
    a request will be made to the DOJ or FTC for a
    Business Review Letter on the proposed policy
    changes.
  • Upon receipt of the Business Review Letter, the
    policy recommendations will be taken to the BoG
    for their consideration and final approval.

10
PatCom Email Reflector
  • All SASB members are encouraged to join the
    pp-dialog email reflector.
  • Information for joining this reflector may be
    found at
  • http//grouper.ieee.org/groups/pp-dialog/sub-inst
    ruct.html

11
PatCom Process
  • As a part of the PatCom process, the views of
    various stakeholders are being heard
  • These views are being expressed by PatCom guests,
    who are appropriately advocating the interests of
    their companies
  • Stakeholders interests are not always aligned
    with IEEE interests
  • It is the responsibility of the SASB and BoG to
    be advocates of the IEEEs interests

12
PatCom The Big Question
  • What else do the members of the SASB need to
    prepare themselves for consideration of these
    changes?

13
Process Transparency
  • Together with counsel, the Standards Association
    is actively investigating alleged violations of
    the standards development process
  • A First step policy change has been made to
    enhance transparency. This change requires
    declaration of affiliation by participants, when
    requested
  • ProCom has been assigned the action to accelerate
    further PP changes
  • One of ProComs first steps will be to develop a
    definition of the term affiliation and describe
    what is expected in a declaration of affiliation

14
Corporate Involvementin theIndividual Process
  • The topic of corporate involvement in the
    individual process has been discussed with
    several companies
  • A proposal to convene a small meeting of
    corporations to further explore this topic has
    been enthusiastically received
  • A meeting is being planned for the late spring
    timeframe

15
Appeals
  • An appeal of C95.1 was heard on Tuesday, 27 March
    2006
  • A decision of the appeals panel is forthcoming
    and due in 30 days

16
SASB Representative to the CAG
  • The SASB has the authority to appoint one of its
    members to serve on the CAG
  • If there is any interest in serving a term on the
    CAG, please contact me

17
2006 SASB Priorities
  • A year of action
  • Complete the investigation of current IP
    questions and deliver recommendations to the BoG
  • Identify and formalize a model for the
    transparent involvement of entities in
    individual standards development activities
  • Promote and strengthen the image of the IEEE-SA
  • As a competent and well managed operation
  • As a developer of globally relevant standards

18
Observations of the Chair
19
Building Promoting the Standards Association
Image
  • The SA should begin a campaign to proactively
    promote itself
  • To the outside world
  • To the other organizational units of the IEEE
    (including the BOD)
  • Judy Gorman and I have co-authored an article to
    Standards Engineering Magazine
  • Other articles are being encouraged

20
Civility requires that we listen to others with
knowledge of the possibility that they are right
and we are wrong. Stephen L. Carter Professor
of Law - Yale (Civility Manners, Morals, and
the Etiquette of Democracy)
Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com