Dual nature of Presidency - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Dual nature of Presidency

Description:

Times of crisis lead to an expansion of presidential power. ... 20th century, presidents have used the 'bully pulpit' of the mass media to build ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: dhar4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dual nature of Presidency


1
Dual nature of Presidency
  • Person
  • Office

2
Presidential Power
  • Times of crisis lead to an expansion of
    presidential power.
  • Especially during times of war, American
    presidents traditionally assume a greater role in
    the separation of powers.

3
  • During the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln declared
    martial law and Congress passed legislation
    allowing the president to use military tribunals
    to make arrests and imprison enemies.

4
  • Similarly, congressional delegations of power to
    the president during wartime empowered Woodrow
    Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt during World Wars I
    and II, respectively, and President George W.
    Bush after September 11, 2001.

5
  • Much of the rise of presidential power in the
    20th century was the result of accumulations of
    such delegated powers because, once power was
    delegated, it was difficult for Congress to
    recover it.

6
The Presidency and the Founding
  • The framers of the Constitution were ambivalent
    about executive power.
  • 1. The colonial experience with the king of
    England and royally appointed governors warned
    Americans of the dangers of strong executives.
  • 2. The weak executive under the Articles of
    Confederation highlighted the problems of
    governing without a potent executive.

7
  • Led by Alexander Hamilton, Federalists sought to
    provide for a presidency that was
  • Energetic
  • Independent of Congress
  • Endowed with sufficient powers to lead

8
The Constitutional Powers of the Presidency
  • Most of the constitutional provisions concerning
    the president and executive power are to be found
    in Article II, which demonstrates the framers
    considerable ambivalence about executive power.
  • Presidential powers combine those expressly
    stated in the Constitution, delegated powers, and
    powers inherent to executive leadership.

9
  • delegated powers
  • constitutional powers that are assigned to one
    government agency but that are exercised by
    another agency with the express permission of the
    first
  • inherent powers
  • powers claimed by a president that are not
    expressed in the Constitution but are inferred
    from it

10
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
  • Why do you think the framers of the Constitution
    feared a strong executive? How well did they
    construct a presidency that was strong enough to
    lead but not so strong as to be dangerous?
  • Do we still have something to fear from an
    imperial president?
  • Does the presidents new role in fighting the war
    against terrorists suggest a new opportunity for
    the imperial growth of the office?

11
  • Delegation Presidential executive powers have
    increased as Congress has created more executive
    departments and agencies and as the federal
    government does more in society.

12
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
  • Do you think the presidency is strong enough to
    compete with Congress in the legislative process?
  • Is it appropriate for the president to veto any
    legislation he doesnt like? Is it appropriate
    for Congress to use any of its powers to stop the
    president from doing something it doesnt like?
  • What could and should be done to expand the
    presidents role in domestic policy making? How
    much is too much?

13
Development Expansion of Presidential Power
  • Washington, Adams Jefferson presidents
    authority
  • Incremental Expansion, 1809-1933
  • Jacksonian Democracy
  • Lincolns Questionable Civil War Acts
  • Growth of Modern Presidency
  • Progressivism, Teddy R., expansion of executive
    power
  • FDRs New Deal and the personalization of the
    presidency
  • Ambivalence of modern presidential power

14
Presidential advantages in contemporary politics
  • Nationalization of American politics
  • Two presidencies foreign policy
  • Public opinion
  • The power to persuade

15
Challenges to presidential leadership
  • High expectations
  • Vulnerability to public will
  • Constant campaign

16
Contemporary Bases of Presidential Power
  • Even though the president is not directly
    elected by the people, the advent of popular
    campaigning, particularly through the mass media,
    has given presidents the ability to claim
    mandates for their policy agendas.

17
  • Political parties and interest groups are also
    important sources of political influence for the
    president.
  • Presidential support in Congress often depends
    on the number of his fellow partisans in the
    House and Senate.

18
Insert Figure 13.3 here
19
  • Presidents use their connections to important
    interest groups and social movements like
    organized labor, or the Christian Right, and the
    NRA to support their programs and initiatives.

20
  • Throughout the 20th century, presidents have
    used the bully pulpit of the mass media to
    build popular support for their legislative
    programs.
  • Franklin Roosevelt used fireside chat radio
    appeals during the era of the New Deal and World
    War II.

21
  • Ronald Reagans communication skills, honed as a
    Hollywood actor, solidified his political
    strength through effective use of television to
    lead the nation and to pressure other political
    elites.

22
  • Contemporary presidents also pay close attention
    to public opinion, particularly their overall job
    approval numbers.
  • These approval numbers serve as an important
    source of influence over other political actors.

23
Insert Figure 13.4 here
24
  • Presidents reliance on media and public opinion
    politics is part of an overall strategy known as
    going public and has led critics to charge that
    the modern presidency governs too little due to a
    permanent campaign.

25
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
  • Do you think that presidential politics has
    become too political?
  • The framers of the Constitution and many
    observers throughout the 19th century thought it
    was inappropriate for presidents to make public
    appeals to build support for their policies. Are
    the concerns of the framers in this regard
    relevant to contemporary politics?
  • Is the contemporary presidency a permanent
    campaign? In what ways might this be a bad thing?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com