Title: Mgt. 667
1Mgt. 667 LeadershipWeekend
2Shattered Glass Case
- True story
- Review case text and questions. Take notes
during film - First three sets of questions ask about
- Values (individual organizational)
- Ethical frameworks (claimed actual)
- Power bases
3Some Ethical Systems
- Utilitarianism greatest good for the greatest
number, or maximize the social benefit function - Universalism (Categorical imperative) would I
be willing to make the basis for my action a
general law binding everyone, given similar
circumstances? - Enlightened self-interest self-interest rightly
understood, with long-term perspective or judging
from my deathbed - Ethical Egoism seek self-interests promote
greatest balance of good over bad for self, with
constraints - Ethics of interdependence relationships,
interdependence, reciprocity
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6Sources of Power
- Formal
- Resources
- System connections positioning
- Expertise
- Personal
- (See Shattered Glass Case p.4)
7Tomorrow
- Myers-Briggs workshop (follow prep. file)
- Complete Instrument 3 (Interpersonal/ Emotional
Competencies) - Prep. Cases 3 4 bring Case 5
- Read Web modules on Ethics Insufficiency of
Honesty
8Mgt. 667 LeadershipSaturday
9Myers-Briggs (MBTI)
- Identifies preferences
- Along four dichotomies
- 16 combinations of these (16 types)
- No good or bad types
- Note that this identifies preferences, not
abilities or skills
10MB Dichotomies
11MB Type Table
12Discuss in groups, then report
- How and for what do I like to be appreciated?
- What irritates me on the job and/or bothers me
most about others? - What do I do that most annoys others?
- What approach from others wins my support for
change? - What kinds of employees are most difficult for me
to work with? (Think of specific, troublesome
situations)
13Some Applications of MB
- Appreciation of differences in communications,
decision making, interpersonal relations, work - Framing reframing (5/18)
- Development planning
14Development Planning
- Continue work you started before class
- Review self profile you prepared, based on MB
results (step 4) - Review /- of your profile as a leader (step 5)
- Identify 1-3 things you can improve and
incorporate them into your Leadership Assessment
Development Plan
15Self-Development(continued)
16- One cannot manage change. One can only be
ahead of it, or as close to this as possible.
Therefore, leader-managers need to develop an
orientation and necessary skills to stay up with
the next waves. - Peter Drucker
17- We discussed earlier K Ps contention that
Leadership development is self development
(p.391) - I gave an invited talk last year, on How to Be
An Effective Leader (simple topic?) - My answer/theme was become an emotionally
mature, self-aware, centered, effective person - Working on this is a life-long, never-finished
journey
18Interpersonal/Emotional Competencies
- Goleman coined the term emotional intelligence
(EI) - His research shows EI is an important factor in
success, especially for leaders - He defined EI as the capacity for
- Recognizing our own feelings those of others
- Motivating ourselves
- Managing emotions effectively in us others
19Interpersonal/Emotional Competencies
- Can be developed and improved
- Vary in importance for different positions
- Golemans 21 competencies, organized into four
clusters - Self-awareness
- Self-management
- Social awareness
- Relationship management
20Review Instrument 3
21Self-Development Planning
- Review results from Instrument 3 to gain insights
re your interpersonal/emotional competencies - Write notes for yourself on the following
22Write notes for yourself on the following
- Identify 2-3 areas in which you want to improve
your interpersonal skills - For each, identify at least two action items that
can help you improve your skills - For each action item, identify some combination
of - Some further training or work to prepare
- A specific situation in which you will practice
improved skills - Trusted individuals who can help coach
encourage you in your plans
23(No Transcript)
24Leadership is not an affair of the head.
- Leadership is an affair of the heart.
25USS Florida Case
- Review your notes re three questions at end of
case - Two groups discuss each of the three questions
report back - All join in
26Ethical Considerations
27Ethics
- What do we mean by ethics or unethical?
- Motivations to behave unethically
- Personal gain, especially power
- Competition
- Restoration of justice or fairness
- What is fairness?
28Some Ways to Behave Unethically
- Selective disclosure /or misrepresentation to
others - Deception
- False threats or false promises
- Provide false information (lie)
- Inflict intentional harm on the other party
- Selective disclosure or misrepresentation to
constituencies
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31Ethical Decisions Have Complexity
- Multiple alternatives
- Broad long-range consequences
- Uncertain consequences
- Mixture of economic, legal, ethical, social, and
personal benefits and costs
32Some Ethical Systems
- Utilitarianism greatest good for the greatest
number, or maximize the social benefit function - Universalism (Categorical imperative) would I
be willing to make the basis for my action a
general law binding everyone, given similar
circumstances? - Enlightened self-interest self-interest rightly
understood, with long-term perspective or judging
from my deathbed - Ethical Egoism seek self-interests promote
greatest balance of good over bad for self, with
constraints - Ethics of interdependence relationships,
interdependence, reciprocity
33Some Ethical Introspections
- Is it right?
- Is it fair?
- How does it smell?
- Who benefits and who gets hurt?
- What if details were made public?
- What would you tell your child to do?
- What if everyone did this?
34Consider
- Learning from your mistakes
- Look in the mirror see how you like what you
see - Put yourself in the other persons shoes and see
how they see you - However, dont be naive
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37Some Moral Dilemmas
- Individually, think about take notes re
scenario 1 (Heinz) - Focus especially on your reasoning
- In groups, share discuss your thinking re the
scenario - Representative from each group gives summary
report to class, primarily reasons for answers
38More Moral Dilemmas
- Individually, think about take notes re
scenarios 2 3 - Focus especially on your reasoning
- In groups, share discuss your thinking re the
scenario assigned to your group - Representative from each group gives summary
report to class, primarily reasons for answers
39(No Transcript)
40Case 4 A Tragic Choice
- Review silently the questions at end of the case
- We discuss Q.1
- Each group takes one of questions 2-5 plus the
general question If you were Jim, what would you
do and why? - reports back - All join in discussion of each
41The Insufficiency of Honesty
- Honesty refusal to steal, lie, or deceive in
any way - Integrity trustworthiness incorruptibility to
a degree that one is incapable of being false to
a trust or responsibility
42Integrity
- Honesty is necessary, but not sufficient
- The most important thing in acting is honesty
once you learn to fake that, youre in. - - Sam Goldwyn
43Integrity
- Honesty
- Discerning
- Examining beliefs assumptions
- Searching for "truth," avoiding error
- Allowing others the same
- Acting on what you have discerned
- Even at personal cost
- Fulfilling moral obligations
- Do no harm to others
- Not just the minimum
44Star Trek CaseMeasure of a Man
45Star Trek Characters
- Capt. Jean-Luc Picard (of Starship Enterprise)
- Capt. Phillipa Louvois (Chief JAG officer for the
sector) - Cmdr. Bruce Maddox (Starfleet Professor of
Robotics) - Lt. Cmdr. Data (android science officer on
Enterprise) - Guinan (bartender, wise old soul)
- Cmdr. William Riker (2nd to Picard)
46Star Trek Case
- Refer to the posted case material you were asked
to bring - At two times in the video, you will need to
respond to several questions in the case, writing
individually then discussing - Pay particular attention to how the characters,
you, and others in the class think
47Questions at First Stop
- Define the issue (or dilemma) faced by Captain
Picard and Lt. Commander Data at this point in
time. - Which of the six ethical frameworks would each
of the following characters (a) claim to be using
in justifying his position? ...and (b) is
actually using, in your opinion? - Lt. Commander Data
- Commander Maddox
- Captain Picard
48Questions at End
- How was the issue in the case finally defined in
the hearing for the purpose of making a ruling? - What was Guinan's contribution to Picard's
thinking approach to the hearing? Be specific
in explaining how she contributed to clarifying
the issue for him. What advantage did she have
over the other characters in advising him? - What are the pros and cons of using an
adversarial process in examining an ethical issue?
49- What was Commander Data's position on the
decision of his "disassembly?" Did it change
during the course of the story? If you think his
position did change, why do you think he changed
it? - When Captain Picard said that the mission of the
Starfleet was to seek out new life, how did
this relate to the issue in the hearing? How do
mission and values differ? How do values and
ethics differ? - Is there a BEST framework for deciding ethical
issues? What lessons does this case have that
can be applied to your work or life situation?
50Look Ahead
- Go over midterm
- Pfeffer ch. 1-3 (use notes for focus)
- Instrument 4, Exercises 1 2, Case 6
- Leadership assessment and development plan due
5/11