Clonal Interference in Large Population - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Clonal Interference in Large Population

Description:

Clonal Interference in Large Population. Su-Chan Park and ... From Crow and Kimura (1965) Gerrish-Lenski Picture (1998) Infinite sites model. No epistasis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ees3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clonal Interference in Large Population


1
Clonal Interference in Large Population
  • Su-Chan Park and Joachim Krug
  • Institute for Theoretical Physics
  • Cologne University

2
Clonal interference
From Crow and Kimura (1965)
3
Gerrish-Lenski Picture (1998)
Assumptions
  • Infinite sites model
  • No epistasis
  • Neglect of the multiple mutations
  • Genetic drift and Clonal interference are
    independent.

4
GL Picture (continued)
Preliminaries (no interference)
  • Fixation Probability
    (c2)
  • Fixation time (escaping genetic drift)
  • N population size
  • m advantageous mutation probability

5
GL Picture (continued)
Criterion for the interference
  • Average number of surviving mutations per
    generation

If gtgt no clonal
interference
Clonal interference becomes prominent when
6
GL Picture (continued)
  • Number of beneficial mutations

No multiple mutations
  • Prob. i) having gt s and ii) escaping drift.

Independence assumption
7
GL Picture (continued)
  • Expected number of superior mutations

Poisson distribution
  • Fixation probability

8
GL Picture (continued)
  • Prob. dist. of the fixed mutations.
  • The rate of substitution
  • Increase of selectivity per fixation

9
GL Picture (continued)
  • The rate of adaptation (fitness increase)
  • Conclusion
  • slow down by the waste of beneficial mutations.
  • speed limit (?) cf. Wilke (2004)
  • predicting the parameters in experiment

10
GL Picture (continued)
  • Rhythmical Substitution Gerrish (2001)
  • E(t) number of fixed mutations until t
  • V(t) variance of fixed mutations until t
  • fixation events are assumed to be renewal

Universal number(!)
cf random Poisson 1
deterministic periodic 0
11
Criticism on the GL Picture
  • Neglect of multiple mutations
  • Before fixation, new mutation can hit the
    mutants besides the wild-type.
  • Independency assumption
  • Prob. of escaping drift should depend on the
    present population distribution.
  • Fixation and Origination Processes

fixation
t
origination
12
Numerical Study on the Wright-Fisher model
13
Numerical Study on the Wright-Fisher model
  • Substitution processes

14
Numerical Study on the Wright-Fisher model
  • Fixation vs Origination Processes

J(k) prob. dist. of fixed mutations per fixation
15
Numerical Study on the Wright-Fisher model
  • Geometric distribution

Neutral theory also predicts the geometric
distribution of the fixed mutation per fixation
events. G. A. Watterson (1982)
16
Numerical Study on the Wright-Fisher model
17
Numerical Study on the Wright-Fisher model
  • Why is q(N) finite as N gets larger?

largest s ,
Fixation process is stochastic even in the
infinite population limit
  • Ratio of the variance to the average for the
    origination process becomes 0.

Origination process becomes deterministic in
the infinite population limit
18
Summary
  • GL picture gives rather reasonable prediction for
    the fitness increase rate for the moderate
    population size.
  • Rhythm is much stronger than predicted by the GL
    picture (deterministic).
  • Can the molecular clock of the HIV be understood
    by our numerical observation?
  • T. Leitner and J. Albert (1999)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com