Dai Yongjiu1, Bi Xunqiang2, Filippo Goirgi2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 68
About This Presentation
Title:

Dai Yongjiu1, Bi Xunqiang2, Filippo Goirgi2

Description:

Dai Yongjiu1, Bi Xunqiang2, Filippo Goirgi2. Preliminary ... IBIS (Foley; Winter in progress) Ocean Fluxes: BATS1e (Dickinson et al 1993) Zeng et al (1998) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 69
Provided by: ibm363
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dai Yongjiu1, Bi Xunqiang2, Filippo Goirgi2


1
Preliminary results of the coupling of CLM with
ICTP RegCM3
  • Dai Yongjiu1, Bi Xunqiang2, Filippo Goirgi2

1, Beijing Normal University, China 2, Abdus
Salam ICTP, Italy
2
Outline
  1. Motivation
  2. Common Land Model
  3. Coupling CLM with RegCM3
  4. Preliminary results

3
Outline
  1. Motivation
  2. Common Land Model
  3. Coupling CLM with RegCM3
  4. Preliminary results

4
ICTP RegCM3
  • Dynamics
  • MM5 Hydrostatic (Grell et al 1994)
  • Non-hydrostatic (MM5 or WRF, in progress)
  • Radiation
  • CCM3.6.6 (Kiehl 1996)
  • Large-Scale Clouds Precipitation
  • SUBEX (Pal et al 2000)
  • Cumulus convection
  • Grell (1993) FC80 Closure
  • Anthes-Kuo (1977)
  • MIT/Emanuel (1991)
  • Betts-Miller (1993)
  • Boundary Layer
  • Holtslag (1990)
  • Tracers/Aerosols
  • Qian et al (2001) Solmon et al (2005)
  • includes dusts (Zakey, in progress)
  • Land Surface
  • BATS1e (Dickinson et al 1993)
  • SUB-BATS (Giorgi et al 2003)
  • CLM (Dai et al 2003, Dai Bi, in progress)
  • IBIS (Foley Winter in progress)
  • Ocean Fluxes
  • BATS1e (Dickinson et al 1993)
  • Zeng et al (1998)
  • Air-Sea Coupling (MITogcm, OASIS coupler, in
    progress)
  • Nesting
  • Numerous GCM/Reanalysis Interfaces
  • Double nesting (one-way)
  • Computations
  • User-Friendly
  • Multiple Platforms
  • Parallel Code (Pu Bi, Gao)

http//www.ictp.trieste.it/pubregcm/RegCM3
5
Motivation for coupling CLM with RegCM3
  • BATS1e, behaves well, but
  • There are some problems for several vegetations
  • For irrigated crop, eccentric behavior !!!
  • Over ocean, in both weak and strong wind
    conditions, tends to over-estimate LH flux.
  • Not enough vertical resolution (one vegetation
    layer, one snow layer, 3 soil layers)
  • Lack the code maintenance (frozen code, no funds
    to update it since 1993)

6
Ocean Flux SchemeBATS vs. Zeng
  • The BATS1e bulk aerodynamic algorithm uses the
    Monin-Obukhov similarity relations without
    special treatments of convective or very stable
    conditions.
  • Overestimate latent heat in both weak and strong
    wind conditions
  • The Zeng algorithm describes all stability
    conditions and includes a gustiness velocity to
    account for the additional flux induced by
    boundary layer scale variability

7
Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme BATS1E
(Dickinson et al 1993)
  • One canopy layer
  • Stomatal conductance (Jarvis-type) model
  • 20 vegetation types
  • One snow layer
  • 3 soil layers(10cm, 12m, 3m)
  • Soil T Force-restore
  • Soil moisture Diffusive/gravitational

8
Motivation for coupling CLM with RegCM3
  • Common Land Model, state of the art !
  • In PILPS and extensive off-line tests, CLM can
    get better results than BATS1e and other LSMs
    (Dai, 2003)
  • The coupling of CLM with CCM3, CLM behaves better
    than LSM (Zeng, 2002)
  • CLM has been coupled with CCSM3(CAM3), WRF, IAP
    AGCM, RSM, LDAS, RegCM,
  • High vertical resolution (one vegetation layer,
    up to 5 snow layers, 10 soil layers)
  • Better maintenance, Free updated CLM code and doc
    are at http//climate.eas.gatech.edu/dickinsono
    r http//www.cgd.ucar.edu/tss/clm

9
Outline
  1. Motivation
  2. Common Land Model
  3. Coupling CLM with RegCM3
  4. Preliminary results

10
Whats the Common Land Model ?
  • Motivation
  • A general land processes model is used as a
    common tools in climate and weather forecasting
    models.
  • History
  • 1996, Concept of CLM, by R. E. Dickinson
  • 1999, Initial CLM code released by Y. Daibased
    on LSM, BATS1e, IAP94
  • 3 year model validation (off-line and coupling)
  • 2002, 2 branch CLM versions are officially
    released.Community Land Model 3.0, Maintained
    by NCAR
  • Common Land Model 3.0, Maintained by
    Georgia Tech

11
CLM (1999 version) major characteristics ?
  1. Enough unevenly spaced layers to adequately
    represent soil temperature and soil moisture, and
    a multi-layer parameterization of snow processes
  2. An explicit treatment of the mass of liquid water
    and ice water and their phase change within the
    snow and soil system
  3. A runoff parameterization following the TOPMODEL
    concept
  4. A canopy photosynthesis-conductance model that
    describes the simultaneous transfer of CO2 and
    water vapor into and out of vegetation
  5. A tiled treatment of subgrid fraction of energy
    and water balance.

12
Horizontal and vertical representation
  • Horizontal
  • Every surface grid cell can be subdivided into
    any number of tiles.
  • Energy and water balance calculations are
    performed over each tile at every time step, and
    each tile maintains its own state variables.
  • The tiles in a grid square respond to the mean
    conditions in the overlying atmospheric grid box,
    and this grid box, in turn, responds to the
    area-weighted fluxes of heat and moisture from
    the tiles.
  • The tiles within a grid square do not interact
    with each other directly.
  • Mosaic treatment
  • Vertical
  • one vegetation layer.
  • 10 soil layers, and the thickness 17.5, 27.6,
    45.5, 75.0, 123.6, 203.8, 336.0, 553.9, 913.3,
    and 1137.0 mm with a total thickness of 3430 mm.
  • up to 5 snow layers (depending on snow depth).
    Contrary to more usual practice, the snow layers
    from top to bottom are numbered as negative
    values.

13
Model Reliability and Maintenance?
  • The model has been extensively evaluated in
    off-line and coupling runs in different groups
    independently. Good performance in off-line and
    coupling validation.
  • Maintenance and future development (physics
    parameterization and land data development) based
    on the major land model groups
  • Dai at Beijing Normal University,
  • Dickinson at Georgia Tech,
  • Bonan at NCAR,
  • Houser at GSFC/NASA,
  • Zeng at U. Arizona,
  • Yang at UT Austin,
  • Denning at CSU

Common Land Model
Community Land Model
14
New development in Common Land Model
  1. Two big leaf model for leaf temperatures,
    photosynthesis-stomatal resistance
  2. Two-stream approximation for canopy albedo
    calculation with the solution for singularity
    point, and the calculations for radiation for the
    separated canopy (sunlit and shaded)
  3. New numerical scheme of iteration for leaf
    temperatures calculation
  4. New treatment for canopy interception with the
    consideration of the fraction of convection and
    large-scale precipitation
  5. Turbulent transfer under canopy

15
  • New development in Common Land Model
  • Soil thermal and hydrological processes with
    theconsideration of the depth to bedrock
  • Surface runoff and sub-surface runoff
  • Rooting fraction and the water stress on
    transpiration
  • Use a grass tile 2m height air temperature in
    place of an area average for matching the routine
    meteorological observation
  • Perfect energy and water balance within every
    time-step
  • A slab ocean-sea ice model
  • Albedo Parameterization Based on MODIS and LDAS
    data.

16
  • New development in Community Land Model
  • Replace biome-type land cover classification
    scheme with plant function type representation
    and its related
  • New methods to enable simulation of the
    terrestrial carbon cycle
  • New methods to enable simulation of dynamic
    vegetation
  • Two-stream approximation for canopy radiation
    transfer
  • River routing model.

17
Outline
  1. Motivation
  2. Common Land Model
  3. Coupling CLM with RegCM3
  4. Preliminary results

18
RegCM3 Modeling System Flow Chart
ECMWF ERA40 NNRP1NNRP2 EH5OM FVGCM HadAMH REGCM

PostProc
PreProc
Main
NetCDF output FERRET, NCL
Global Terrrestrial Data
Global 1x1 SST Data
GrADS output ATM.yyyymmddhh RAD.yyyymmddhh SRF.yyy
ymmddhh CHE.yyyymmddhh
POSTPROC
SST
Terrain
ICBC
POSTPROCv5d
ICBCyyyymmddhh
Vis5D
RegCM Main
SIGMAtoP
DOMAIN.INFO
19
Land surface characteristic field
Terrain
  • Raw Source data
  • Global, Resolution 30sec.x 30sec.
  • ( 0.925 km)
  • - Elevation data
  • USGS DEM
  • - Vegetation/land-use data
  • USGS (24 category 1)
  • - Soil texture data global
  • FAO global USGS US domain
  • 2 vertical layers 0-30 cm 30-100cm.

20
USGS Land Use/Land Cover Legend
0. Ocean 1. Urban and Built-Up Land 2. Dry-land
Cropland and Pasture 3. Irrigated Cropland and
Pasture 4. Mixed Dry-land / Irrigated Cropland
and Pasture 5. Cropland / Grassland Mosaic 6.
Cropland/Woodland Mosaic 7. Grassland 8.
Shrubland 9. Mixed Shrubland/Grassland 10.
Savanna
11. Deciduous Broadleaf Forest 12. Deciduous
Needleleaf Forest 13. Evergreen Broadleaf Forest
14. Evergreen Needleleaf Forest 15. Mixed
Forest 16. Inland Water Bodies 17. Herbaceous
Wetland 18. Wooded Wetland 19. Barren or
Sparsely Vegetated 20. Herbaceous Tundra 21.
Wooded Tundra 22. Mixed Tundra 23. Bare Ground
Tundra 24. Snow or Ice
21
90 sec x 90 sec
1. Urban 1. Urban 7. Grassland
16. Lake 7. Grassland 7. Grassland
15. Mixed forest 19. Barren 16. Lake
5 patches 1. Urban 2/9 7. Grassland 3/9 15.
Mixed forest 1/9 16. Lake 2/9 19. Barren 1/9
regroup 30 sec. data to 60, 30, 10, 5, 3, 2 min.
data
22
16-category Soil categories
1. Sand 2. Loamy Sand 3. Sandy Loam 4. Silt
Loam 5. Silt 6. Loam 7. Sandy Clay Loam 8. Silty
Clay Loam 9. Clay Loam 10. Sandy Clay 11. Silty
Clay 12. Clay 13. Organic Materials 14. Water 15.
Bedrock 16. Other
23
90 sec x 90 sec
3. Sandy loam 4.Silt Loam 1. Sand
9.Clay Loam 1. Sand 12 Clay
5 Silt 6. Loam 12. Clay
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Soil temperature and Soil Moisture
ICBC
  • ERA40
  • Global, Resolution 2.5ox 2.5o, 4 layer
  • NCEP/NCAR reanalysis type I
  • Global, Resolution 2.5ox 2.5o

30
Outline
  1. Motivation
  2. Common Land Model
  3. Coupling CLM with RegCM3
  4. Preliminary results

31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
ICTP RegCM3with new packages
  • Land Surface
  • BATS1e (Dickinson et al 1993)
  • SUB-BATS (Giorgi et al 2003)
  • CLM (Dai et al 2003, Dai Bi, in progress)
  • IBIS (Foley Winter in progress)
  • Ocean Fluxes
  • BATS1e (Dickinson et al 1993)
  • Zeng et al (1998)
  • Air-Sea Coupling (MITogcm, OASIS coupler, in
    progress)
  • Nesting
  • Numerous GCM/Reanalysis Interfaces
  • Double nesting (one-way)
  • Computations
  • User-Friendly
  • Multiple Platforms
  • Parallel Code (Pu Bi, Gao)
  • Dynamics
  • MM5 Hydrostatic (Grell et al 1994)
  • Radiation
  • CCM3.6.6 (Kiehl 1996)
  • Large-Scale Clouds Precipitation
  • SUBEX (Pal et al 2000)
  • Cumulus convection
  • Grell (1993) FC80 Closure
  • Anthes-Kuo (1977)
  • MIT/Emanuel (1991)
  • Betts-Miller (1993)
  • Zhang-McFarlane (new closure)
  • Boundary Layer
  • Holtslag (1990)
  • Tracers/Aerosols
  • Qian et al (2001) Solmon et al (2005)
  • includes dusts (Zakey, in progress)

43
The End
44

A Two-big-Leaf Model for Canopy Temperature,
Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance (Journal
of Climate, June 2004)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48

Two-stream Approximation for Canopy Albedoes
Calculation with the Solution for Singularity
Point (Journal of Climate, June 2004)
49
Singular points at two-stream approximation
radiative transfer model of Sellers (1985)
  • 1.

are the coefficients of the projected area in
solar incident direction
2.
are the the scattering coefficient of
phytoelements and upscatter parameters for
diffuse and direct beams
50

New treatment for canopy interception with the
consideration of the fraction of convection and
large-scale precipitation
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
Turbulent transfer under canopy(Treatment of
under-canopy turbulence in land models by Zeng et
al. 2004, Journal of Climate)
54
Soil thermal and hydrological processes with the
consideration of the depth to bedrock
55
Depth to bedrock
56
Representation of the Land Surface and its
Overlying Near Surface Air Temperature in Climate
Models
57
(No Transcript)
58
  • All covers smaller than 1 are either discarded,
    and carried to the largest area tile in
    grid-squares, with the exception of grass that is
    assumed to always be at least 1.
  • Use of a grass tile temperature in place of an
    area average or of an average of daily maximum
    and minimum values rather than a 24-hr average
    can change the estimates of daily temperatures
    over regions by up to half a degree as a result
    of the diurnal patterns of surface temperatures
    and their dependence on cover.

59

Albedo Parameterization Based on MODIS and LDAS
data
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
New Conceptual Model Bare Soil Albedo
63
New Conceptual Model Vegetation Albedo
64
New Conceptual Model Static Localization Factor
65
New Conceptual Model Optimization Solution
Parameters
Optimization Solver
FSQP FORTRAN Feasible Sequential Quadratic
Programming http//www.aemdesign.com/downloadfsqp.
htm Designed to find the optimal solution for the
minimization of the maximum of a set of smooth
objective functions subject to equality and
inequality constraints, linear or nonlinear, and
simple bounds on the variables. It requires the
accurate definition of the objective functions
and constraint functions as well as the gradients
of these functions to achieve a robust solution.

Zhou, J. L., A. L. Tits, and C. T. Lawrence,
1997 Users Guide for FFSQP Version 3.7 A
FORTRAN Code for Solving Constrained Nonlinear
(Minimax) Optimization Problems, Generating
Iterates Satisfying All Inequality and Linear
Constraints. Institute for Systems Research,
University of Maryland, Technical Report
SRC-TR-92-107r5, College Park, MD 20742, 44 pp.
66
Grassland
OLD
NEW
67
NEW correlation
NEW relative bias
OLD correlation
OLD relative bias
Direct Visible
Direct Near Infrared
68
NEW correlation
NEW relative bias
OLD correlation
OLD relative bias
Diffuse Visible
Diffuse Near Infrared
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com