Options for Accessible Webcasts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Options for Accessible Webcasts

Description:

MAGpie. http://ncam.wgbh.org/webaccess/magpie/ Free download. Can be problematic ' ... 'MAGpie Training Kit' http://centerondeafness.utk.edu/pec/products ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: michell120
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Options for Accessible Webcasts


1
Options for Accessible Webcasts Online Media
  • Michelle Swaney,Technology Specialist
  • PEPNet-Southmswaney_at_utk.edu

2
Philip A. Hyssong, CMRSManaging
PartnerAlternative Communication Services,
LLCP.O. Box 278Lombard, IL 60148800-335-0911
www.AlternativeCommunicationServices.comP
hil_at_ACSCaptions.com
3
PEPNet-South
http//www.pepnet.org
4
Postsecondary Education Programs for Individuals
Who Are Deaf (CFDA 84.326D)October 1, 2006
September 30, 2011
  • PEPNet-South One of four regional centers that
    is funded to help secondary and postsecondary
    institutions more effectively address the
    postsecondary, vocational, technical, continuing,
    and adult education needs of individuals with
    deafness, including those who are deaf with
    co-occurring disabilities such as learning and
    emotional disabilities.
  • PEPNet-South serves thirteen states including
    Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
    Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
    Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West
    Virginia
  • Four regional centers Midwest (St. Paul
    College, St. Paul, MN), Northeast (Rochester
    Institute of Technology, National Technical
    Institute for the Deaf, Rochester, NY), South
    (Center on Deafness, University of Tennessee,
    Knoxville, TN), West (National Center on
    Deafness, California State University at
    Northridge, CA)
  • The four regional centers must coordinate the
    development and implementation of all required
    activities (technical assistance and
    dissemination, personnel development and
    technology use) in order to avoid overlap and
    duplication of efforts. Centers must ensure that
    secondary education programs, parents, and
    individuals who are deaf have information on
    postsecondary programs throughout the country,
    including information on services these
    institutions provide, and that information on
    proven models and other exemplary practices,
    including innovative technology, is available in
    each of the four regions. This coordination must
    include carrying out collaborative activities and
    cross-regional initiatives, where appropriate.

5
  • Technology Use Activities (Consistent with
    section 674(b) of IDEA)
  • Each regional centers technology use activities
    must, at a minimum
  • Conduct an assessment to determine the technology
    needs and priorities of postsecondary
    institutions related to recruiting, enrolling,
    retaining, and instructing students who are deaf,
    and addressing the varying communication needs of
    and methods used by individuals who are deaf,
    such as oral transliteration services, cued
    language transliteration services, sign language
    transliteration and interpreting services, and
    transcription services.
  • Provide technical assistance and consultation,
    in-service training, and planning and development
    assistance to administrators, faculty, and
    support staff at postsecondary education
    institutions to address the needs identified in
    the assessment conducted under paragraph (a).
    These activities must (1) be designed to enhance
    access to programs by and accommodation of
    individuals who are deaf and (2) as needed,
    provide information and technological support and
    B-5 in-service training to personnel at
    postsecondary institutions who provide services
    to students who are deaf.
  • Demonstrate how postsecondary institutions can
    use technology to meet their responsibilities
    under Federal statutes, including section 504 of
    the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and
    the Americans with Disabilities Act, to provide
    access and accommodations to individuals who are
    deaf.

6
2007 PEPNet Needs Assessment
  • Conducted March May
  • Targeted groups (a) professionals providing
    services to individuals who are deaf or hard of
    hearing in postsecondary settings and (b)
    individuals who are stakeholders in the
    postsecondary lives of individuals who are deaf
    or hard of hearing, included in this group are
    students and their parents, deaf adults, and
    state and federal administrators of programs
    serving deaf and hard-of-hearing persons.
  • Approximately 2,231 responses
  • Questions and preliminary results relating to
    technology

7
2007 PEPNet Needs Assessment (cont)
  • Rate your Personnel Development/Technical
    Assistance needs related to Captioning for
    students who are deaf or hard of hearing

8
2007 PEPNet Needs Assessment (cont)
  • Rate your Personnel Development/Technical
    Assistance for providing access (inclusion) to
    students who are deaf or hard of hearing when
    courses utilize technology delivery.
  • Rate your other technology training needs for
    serving students who are deaf or hard of hearing.

9
Items for Discussion
  • About Captions/Captioning
  • The Law
  • How Does Captioning Apply to Universal Design or
    Vice-versa?
  • Considerations for Captioning Media
  • Whats Currently Being Done?
  • Whats Needed?

10
About Captions/Captioning
  • Web Captioning Overviewhttp//www.webaim.org/tech
    niques/captions/
  • Who Needs Captions?
  • Individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
  • Individuals who are ESL
  • Individuals who are visual learners
  • Individuals who are LD/ADD/ADHD
  • Those of us who are aging
  • Children learning to read

11
Types of Captions
  • http//www.webaim.org/techniques/captions/
  • Closed Captions
  • Open Captions
  • Sub-titles
  • DCMP Captioning Key - http//www.dcmp.org/caai/nad
    h7.pdf
  • Sub-titles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (SDH)

12
The Law
  • Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act
  • State Laws Captioning of Electronic Video
    Instructional Materials
  • Missouri House Bill 181http//beta.house.mo.gov/c
    ontent.aspx?info/bills071/biltxt/truly/HB0181T.HT
    M
  • Legal Opinion - M 03-09 New requirements
    regarding implementation of section 508 of the
    Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 
  • California Community Colleges Chancellors Office
    http//www.cccco.edu/Portals/4/Legal/opinions/atta
    chments/03-09.pdf

13
How Does Universal Design Apply to Captioning or
Vice-versa?
  • The Principles of Universal DesignNorth Carolina
    State University Poster http//www.design.ncsu.ed
    u/cud/pubs_p/docs/poster.pdf
  • Universal DesignClass Act Promoting Access for
    Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students
    http//www.rit.edu/classact/side/universaldesign.
    html

14
Considerations for Captioning Media
  • Is the content live or archived?
  • Sample of a live webcast (http//mediabeast.ites.u
    tk.edu/mediasite4/Catalog/?cidc1953026-0f6b-4bc5-
    a3b5-42e71c8fe2b5)
  • Archived content (http//mediabeast.ites.utk.edu/m
    ediasite4/Catalog/?cid662fc03a-59f0-42a5-a1f0-24c
    d42cc50d7)
  • Do you need real-time captioning, text
    interpreting/transcribing or automatic speech
    recognition?
  • Does the software/hardware used to create live
    video streams or webcasts have accessibility
    features built-in?
  • Should captioning be done in-house or by an
    outside company? There are two parts to this
    issue/question
  • A) the actual captioning process or creation of
    the transcript (for live or archived events)
  • B) the process of taking the transcript and
    captioning a file (post-production process)

15
Real-time Captioning, Text Interpreting/Transcribi
ng, or ASR . . .
  • Real-time Captioning
  • http//www.dcmp.org/caai/nadh28.pdf
  • Alternative Communication Services -
    http//www.acscaptions.com/
  • Text Interpreting/Transcribing
    http//www.stsn.org/
  • Automatic Speech Recognition
  • Definitions http//www.webaim.org/techniques/ca
    ptions/realtime.php Comparisonhttp//www.stsn
    .org/servicechart.html http//www.acscaptions.co
    m/
  • What is available on your campus??

16
Does the Software Have Accessibility Features
Built-in?
  • QuickTime
  • Real
  • WindowsMedia Encoder
  • Flash
  • Accordent Video Streaming
  • MediaSite

17
Post-production Captioning -Outsourcing or
In-house . . . How Do You Decide?
  • What is the length of the project and how quickly
    does it need to be done?
  • What are the up-front vs. long-term costs?
  • Will it require more time and personnel to
    accomplish the project in-house rather than
    outsourcing?
  • Other items to consider are a) need, b) volume,
    c) cost, and d) how often is it needed?
  • Automated Captioning Service Company for Media
    Automatic Sync Technologieshttp//www.automaticsy
    nc.com/ Live remote captioning not provided!

18
Post-production CaptioningIn-house Personnel
Costs to Consider
  • For a 30-minute video
  • 34 hours to transcribe
  • 34 hours to digitize
  • 23 hours to do line breaks
  • 23 hours to sync the captions to the audio
  • 1014 hours total

19
Software Options for Post-production Captioning
of Digital Media
  • MAGpie
  • http//ncam.wgbh.org/webaccess/magpie/
  • Free download
  • Can be problematic
  • MAGpie Training Kit
  • http//centerondeafness.utk.edu/pec/products/magpi
    ekit.html
  • Hi-Caption
  • http//www.hisoftware.com/hmcc/index.html
  • 400500

20
Whats Currently Being Done?(Not a lot!)
  • Whats the best approach or standard?
  • What resources are available?
  • DCMP Captioning Key -http//www.dcmp.org/caai/nadh
    7.pdf
  • EASI Training - http//www.rit.edu/easi/
  • What about captioning for course
    delivery/distance learning?

21
Whats Needed?
  • Campuses/institutions that are willing to take
    the bull by the horns and find a way to
    effectively provide accessible media.
  • Collaboration, teamwork and information sharing
    with those individuals or campuses who are
    willing to make media accessible and those who
    have attempted.

22
A BIG Thank you to . . .
  • Parker Owens, (EKU)
  • University of Tennessee Office of Information
    Technology
  • PEPNet-South
  • Phil Hyssong and Mike Cano Alternative
    Communication Solutionshttp//www.acscaptions.com
    /
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com