Quality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Quality

Description:

Dr. Nick Turkal, MD, President and CEO, Aurora Health Care (Milwaukee, WI) ... Dr. Evan Benjamin, MD, FACP, Chief Quality Officer, Baystate Health (Springfield, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: wha85
Category:
Tags: quality

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quality


1
Quality and Cost Trend AnalysisPositive findings
using data from CMS/Premier P4P hospitals
Thursday, January 31, 2008 The Press Club Holeman
Lounge Washington, DC
2
Speakers
  • Blair Childs, Senior Vice President of Public
    Affairs, Premier healthcare alliance
  • Mark Wynn, Director of the Division of Payment
    Policy Demonstrations, Centers for Medicare and
    Medicaid Services
  • Richard A. Norling, President and CEO, Premier
    healthcare alliance
  • Dr. Nick Turkal, MD, President and CEO, Aurora
    Health Care (Milwaukee, WI)
  • Dr. Mark D. Povroznik, PharmD, Director of
    Quality Initiatives, Chairman of Infection
    Control, United Hospital Center (Clarksburg, WV)
  • Dr. Evan Benjamin, MD, FACP, Chief Quality
    Officer, Baystate Health (Springfield, MA)
    Associate Professor of Medicine, Tufts University
    School of Medicine

3
CMS Comments on the Premier Hospital Quality
Incentive Demonstration
  • Mark Wynn, Ph.D.
  • Director, Division of Payment
  • Policy Demonstrations
  • Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services
  • Mark.Wynn_at_CMS.HHS.gov

4
CMS Value-Based Purchasing Demonstrations
  • Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demo
  • Physician Group Practice Demonstration
  • Medicare Care Management Performance
    Demonstration (small-med physician offices)
  • Nursing Home Value-Based Purchasing Demonstration
    (in development)
  • Home Health VBP Demonstration (in development)

5
The Premier Hospital Quality Incentive
Demonstration (HQID)
  • Demonstration with 250 hospitals in Premier, Inc
    quality alliance
  • Uses financial incentives to encourage hospitals
    to provide high quality inpatient care
  • Tests the impact of quality incentives

6
HQID Hospital Scoring
  • Hospitals scored on quality measures related to
    each of 5 conditions
  • Roll-up individual measures into overall score
    for each condition
  • Categorized by condition to determine top
    performers
  • Incentives paid separately for each condition

7
Demonstration Phase Two Policies
  • Incentives if quality exceeds baseline mean
    (4.8 million)
  • Pay for highest 20 attainment (3.6M)
  • Pay for 20 highest improvement (3.6M)
  • Hospitals paid in relation to number of Medicare
    FFS inpatients
  • Total incentives 12 million

8
Lessons Learned
  • Value Based Purchasing can work provides focus
    on quality
  • Modest dollars can have big impacts
  • Sustained improvement in each year
  • Demonstration provided valuable lessons on how to
    operate hospital VBP, lessons used in CMS policy
    proposal

9
  • Richard A. Norling
  • President and CEO
  • Premier healthcare alliance

10
CMS/Premier demonstrate pay for performance
Premier is leading the first national CMS
pay-for-performance demonstration for hospitals.
More than 250 Premier hospitals participate
voluntarily.
Hypothesis
Financial Incentives and transparency improve
hospital quality performance
Findings
  • Financial incentives did focus hospital executive
    attention on measuring and improving quality.
  • Hospitals performance has improved continuously
    over time.

11
Widely accepted clinical indicators
  • Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)
  • Percentage of patients who received an
    oxygenation assessment within 24 hours prior to
    or after hospital arrival
  • Initial antibiotic selection
  • Initial antibiotic consistent with current
    recommendations - ICU
  • Initial antibiotic consistent with current
    recommendations - Non ICU
  • Blood culture collected prior to first antibiotic
    administration
  • Influenza screening/vaccination
  • Pneumococcal screening/vaccination
  • Antibiotic timing, percentage of pneumonia
    patients who received first dose of antibiotics
    within four hours after hospital arrival
  • Smoking cessation advice/counseling
  • Hip and knee replacement
  • Prophylactic antibiotic received within one hour
    prior to surgical incision
  • Prophylactic antibiotic selection for surgical
    patients
  • Prophylactic antibiotics discontinued within 24
    hours after surgery end time
  • Post operative hemorrhage or hematoma
  • Post operative physiologic and metabolic
    derangement
  • Acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
  • Aspirin at arrival
  • Aspirin prescribed at discharge
  • ACEI for LVSD
  • Smoking cessation advice/counseling
  • Beta blocker prescribed at discharge
  • Beta blocker at arrival
  • Thrombolytic received within 30 minutes of
    hospital arrival
  • PCI received within 120 minutes of hospital
    arrival
  • Inpatient mortality rate
  • Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
  • Aspirin prescribed at discharge
  • CABG using internal mammary artery
  • Prophylactic antibiotic received within one hour
    prior to surgical incision
  • Prophylactic antibiotic selection for surgical
    patients
  • Prophylactic antibiotics discontinued within 24
    hours after surgery end time
  • Inpatient mortality rate
  • Post operative hemorrhage or hematoma

12
Dramatic and Sustained Improvement
Avg. improvement across all clinical areas for
median CQS (15 quarters) 17.3
CMS HQID Composite Quality Score
CMS Quality Score
13
HQID Hospitals Started Project at National Average
HQID hospitals did not have higher quality
ratings than national hospitals overall at the
beginning of the project Composite process score
A composite of 14 measures shared in common
between HQID and the Joint Commission Comparative
for the first quarter of the project shows P4P
hospitals performing below the nation as a whole.
14
Improvement Across All HQID Participants
  • Quality improvement across all hospitals
  • Variation in hospital performance decreased

CABG CMS Quality Score Threshold Changes by Year
AMI (heart attack) CMS HQID Quality Score
Threshold Changes by Year
Pneumonia CMS Quality Score Threshold Changes by
Year
15
In Broader Comparison, HQID Hospitals Excel
National Leaders in Quality Performance
HQID hospitals have higher quality ratings than
national hospitals overall CMS process score
  • HQID participants avg. 6.5 higher than
    Non-Participants
  • Avg. improvement for HQID participants 7.8
  • Avg. improvement for Non-participants 5.6
  • New England Journal of Medicine publication by
    Lindenauer et al. (February 2007) found that
    hospitals engaged in P4P achieved quality scores
    2.6 to 4.1 percentage points above other
    hospitals due solely to the impact of P4P
    incentives.

A composite of 19 measures shared in common
between HQID and Hospital Compare shows P4P
hospitals performing above the nation as a whole
16
Premier Performance Pays Research Update
Premiers Performance Pays study demonstrated
that when evidence-based care is reliably
delivered, quality is higher and costs are lower.
The recently updated study using all payors and
three years of data(over 1.1 million patients),
confirms this result.
Study finds higher reliable care yields lower
mortality rates for heart bypass surgery patients
Study finds higher reliable care yields lower
hospital costs for patients with pneumonia
Patient Process Measure
Patient Process Measure
17
Results Not Unique to Medicare Patients
Hospital Costs for Pneumonia Patients
Commercial (N9,909)
Managed Care (N32,842)
Medicaid (N14,646)
Medicaid Managed Care (N5,012)
Traditional Medicare (N149,317)
Medicare Managed Care (N12,645)
Statistical Significance Commercial (lt.05), Mgd
Care (lt.001), Medicaid (lt.001), Medicaid Mgd Care
(lt.01), Medicare (lt.001), Medicare Mgd Care
(lt.001) 
18
More Patients are Reliably Receiving
Evidence-based Care
Evidence-based Care Improvements
Avg. improvement in all clinical areas (15
quarters) 52.6
Appropriate Care Score
19
Hospital Level Cost Trend Emerges Over 3 Years
Median Severity Adjusted (APR-DRG) Cost per Case
from October 2003 September 2006
Knee Replacement Patients (7,000 cases per qtr
/- 850)
AMI Patients ( 19,000 cases per qtr /- 2,500)
Pneumonia Patients (34,000 cases per qtr /-
13,000)
N of hospitals 233 /- 12
N of hospitals 191 /- 7
N of hospitals 253 /- 10
CABG Patients (8,300 cases per qtr /- 1,750)
Heart Failure Patients (27,500 cases per qtr /-
5,000)
Hip Replacement Patients (3,150 cases per qtr /-
350)
N of hospitals 250 /- 10
N of hospitals 145 /- 8
N of hospitals 130 /- 5
Statistical Significance Cost -- AMI
(plt0.01), HF (plt0.001), PN (plt0.05).
20
Hospital Level Mortality Trend Emerges Over 3
Years
Median Severity Adjusted (APR-DRG) Mortality from
October 2003 September 2006
AMI Patients ( 19,000 cases per qtr /- 2,500)
Pneumonia Patients (34,000 cases per qtr /-
13,000)
N of hospitals 233 /- 12
N of hospitals 253 /- 10
CABG Patients (8,300 cases per qtr /- 1,750)
Heart Failure Patients (27,500 cases per qtr /-
5,000)
N of hospitals 130 /- 5
N of hospitals 250 /- 10
Statistical Significance Mortality -- AMI
(plt0.001), HF (plt0.001), PN (plt0.001), CABG
(plt0.01). Hip and knee replacements had
insufficient mortalities for analysis
HQID based on 3M APR-DRG severity-adjustment
21
Using CareScience Risk Adjustment Method
Median Risk Adjusted Mortality from October 2003
September 2006
AMI Patients ( 19,000 cases per qtr /- 2,500)
Pneumonia Patients (34,000 cases per qtr /-
13,000)
N of hospitals 233 /- 12
N of hospitals 253 /- 10
Heart Failure Patients (27,500 cases per qtr /-
5,000)
CABG Patients (8,300 cases per qtr /- 1,750)
N of hospitals 130 /- 5
N of hospitals 250 /- 10
Statistical Significance Mortality -- AMI
(plt0.001), HF (plt0.001), PN (plt0.001), CABG
(plt0.001). Hip and knee replacements had
insufficient mortalities for analysis
22
Improvement and Savings
Avg. improvement in mortality across four
clinical areas 1.87
  • Avg. cost improvement per patient across all
    clinical areas
  • 1,063

If all hospitals in the nation were to achieve
this improvement, the estimated cost savings
would be greater than 4.5 billion annually with
estimated 70,000 lives saved per year
23
Supported by Industry Research
  • Better outcomes are associated with hospitals
    where...
  • The Board spends gt25 of time on quality issues
    (p 0.009)
  • The Board receives a formal quality performance
    measurement report (p0.005)
  • There is a high level of interaction between the
    board and the medical staff on quality strategy
    (p0.021)
  • The senior executives compensation is based in
    part on QI performance (p0.008)
  • The CEO is identified as the person with the
    greatest impact on QI (p0.01), especially when
    so identified by the QI executive (plt0.001).

Kroch, E. A., et al. (2006). "Hospital Boards and
Quality Dashboards." Journal of Patient Safety
2(1) 10-19. Vaughn, et al. (2006). "Engagement
of Leadership in Quality Improvement Initiatives
Executive Quality Improvement Survey Results."
Journal of Patient Safety 2(1) 2-9.
24
Conclusions
  • Financial incentives combined with public
    reporting of transparent data can drive
    significant improvement in quality
  • Hospitals held the gains and continued to improve
  • More patients are reliably receiving
    evidenced-based care
  • Improved quality is associated with saving lives
    and reducing costs

25
Aurora Health Care (Milwaukee, WI)
Dr. Nick Turkal, MD President and CEO Aurora
Health Care
26
Aurora Health Care System Components 2008
  • Private, not-for-profit integrated health care
    system
  • 13 hospitals (soon to be 15)
  • 23 counties, 95 communities
  • 750 AMG physicians in 100 clinics
  • 250 Advanced physicians
  • VNA - largest in Wisconsin
  • 130 retail pharmacies
  • 27,500 employees
  • 101,500 inpatient discharges
  • 1.4 million outpatient visits
  • 2.6 million ambulatory care visits

27
Aurora Health Care Best Practices for Success
Auroras 1 Priority Our patients deserve and
expect the best care. We will give people better
results than they can get anywhere else by
achieving top performance in all our quality
measures. For Aurora, there is no alternative
28
Aurora HQID Bingo Card
Achieve progress towards the 2007 goal of being
in the top 20 for all Medicare (CMS)
pay-for-performance measures by achieving above
median performance for each one of these
measures by year-end 2005.
Decile Performance -- 1 Top Performer 10
Bottom Performer Based on HQID Year 1 Results
(4th Q 2003 3rd Q 2004 Data)
29
Aurora HQID Bingo Card
Achieve progress towards the 2007 goal of being
in the top 20 for all Medicare (CMS)
pay-for-performance measures by achieving above
median performance for each one of these measures.
Performance 1 Top Performer 10 Bottom
Performer
85 in Upper Median 58 in Top 20 Based on Oct.
2006 June 2007 Data
On track for Top Improvement Award
30
CMS/Premier HQID Best Patient Care
31
Aurora Health System Improving Cost and Quality
Memorial Hospital Burlington Hip and Knee
Replacement Patients
Aurora St Luke's Medical Center Quality improved
and Cost decreased in AMI Patients
West Allis Memorial Hospital Heart Failure
Patients
32
  • Dr. Mark D. Povroznik, PharmD
  • Director of Quality Initiatives,
  • Chairman of Infection Control
  • United Hospital Center (Clarksburg, WV)

33
  • Private, not-for-profit
  • 375 licensed beds
  • 140 active medical staff
  • 1,800 active employees
  • 1,375 FTE's
  • 150 volunteers
  • 14,994 annual admissions
  • 176 million annual operating budget
  • 25 million annual uncompensated care

Merged with West Virginia University Hospitals in
1997 to form the West Virginia United Health
System
34
Transition from Bottom to Top Performance
United Hospital Center Clarksburg, WV
CONSISTENT TOP PERFORMER
  • Top performer in two areas in Year 2
  • Top performer in three areas in Year 3
  • Tracking to be top performer in four areas in
    Year 4

35
Historical Perspective
D ata
R ich
I nformation
P oor
36
Revised Processes
  • Nurtures house-wide collaboration
  • Provides consistency, uniformity and clear
    expectations
  • Reduces amount of duplicate efforts by multiple
    departments
  • Collective reasoning and prioritization
  • Builds in accountability and ownership of P.I.
    activities
  • Assigned to champion and tied into quarterly
    goals and objectives

37
Annual PI Planning
  • Premier Clinical Advisor Data Analysis
  • LOS, Mortality, Complications, and Readmission
    Outliers
  • UHC performance vs Expected vs Peer Groups
  • External comparisons
  • HQA, AHRQ, Health Grades
  • Proposed Future focus
  • IHI, JCAHO, Sg2 health care intelligence, HPPS
  • Opportunity for multi-disciplinary feedback
  • What did we miss?
  • Early Buy-in by department leaders

38
Leadership Support of Data Analysis
  • Positive culture BOD, Med Staff, C-Suite
  • Bold system level aims
  • Negative trends assigned to a hospital champion
  • Corrective Action Plans Developed, Implemented,
    and Reported back to the P.A. Subcommittee
  • Moving away from a Reactive focus to structured
    Proactive plan
  • United Hospital Centers culture for excellence
    was featured by the Institute for Healthcare
    Improvement during the 2007 Fall Harvest Tour

39
Closing the Loop
Quality Improvement
Annual PI Planning
Implementation Oversight
Department Level Review Approval
Medical Staff Review Approval
40
Expanded approach to quality
UHCs 2007 Performance Improvement Plan
  • Quality
  • National Quality Indicators!
  • 5 Million Lives Campaign
  • Maintain Sepsis Mortality lt Peer
  • Critical care protocol for tight glycemic control
  • Readmission rate evaluation
  • JCAHO Stroke indicators
  • Implement Medical Staff Grand-rounds system
  • Continued Medical record automation
  • Patient Safety
  • Reduce Central Line infection rate to lt3.7
  • Reduce Ventilator-associated Pneumonia to 6.0
    (ICU) and 4.2 (CCU)
  • Develop a unified DVT risk assessment / protocol
  • Best practices to minimize Clostridium difficile
    infections
  • Minimizing Cardio-toxicity associated with Local
    Anesthetic use

41
Highlight of Success Stories
Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
  • Moved from 71 compliance with PCI within 120
    minutes to 100 compliance within 90
    minutes
  • Mortality reduction by nearly 55
  • Sustained 100 performance for the HQID
    measures
  • Improved D2B times (2007 average 62 minutes)

UHC is Part of a WV State PCI Demonstration
Project
42
Highlight of Success Stories (contd)
  • Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
  • Reduced VAP rates
  • Reduced CCU VAP rate from 23.8 to zero for 9
    months
  • Reduced ICU VAP rate from 21.0 to zero for 12
    months
  • Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)
  • Sustained 100 performance for the HQID measure
  • Hip and Knee Replacement Surgery
  • Documented improved Quality and decreased Cost

43
Improvements in Quality and Outcomes
Quality improved and Cost decreased in Hip and
Knee Replacement Patients
Quality improved and Mortality Rate decreased in
Heart Failure Patients
44
  • Dr. Evan Benjamin, MD, FACP
  • Chief Quality Officer
  • Baystate Health (Springfield, MA)
  • Associate Professor of Medicine
  • Tufts University School of Medicine

45
NEJM Study From Division of Healthcare Quality,
Baystate Medical Center
B. Heart Failure
A. Acute Myocardial Infarction
Lindenauer P et al. N Engl J Med 2007356486-496
D. Composite of 10 Measures
C. Pneumonia
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com