MorphBank - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

MorphBank

Description:

Fredrik Ronquist (Department of Biological Science, School of Computational Science) ... Gabriel Logan, Analyst/Web Services. Debbie Paul, Functional Analyst ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: gregr158
Category:
Tags: morphbank

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MorphBank


1
  • MorphBanks Approach to
  • Determination Annotations

Austin Mast David Gaitros Fredrik Ronquist
Peter Jörgensen Corinne Jörgensen Greg
Riccardi
2
Outline
  • Acknowledgements
  • The Motivation
  • The System
  • A Collaborative Environment
  • Creating Collections
  • Creating Annotations
  • The User Trials
  • Future Directions

3
Acknowledgments
  • PIs
  • Fredrik Ronquist (Department of Biological
    Science, School of Computational Science)
  • Greg Riccardi (College of Information)
  • Austin Mast (Department of Biological Science)
  • Greg Erickson (Department of Biological Science)
  • Robert van Engelen (School of Computational
    Science)
  • Corinne Jörgensen (College of Information)
  • Peter Jörgensen (College of Information)
  • Research Associates
  • Andrew Deans (School of Computational Science)
  • Gordan Erlebacher (School of Computational
    Science)
  • Katja Seltmann (School of Computational Science)

4
Acknowledgments
  • Development Team
  • David A. Gaitros, Project Director
  • Wilfredo Blanco, Lead Analyst/Graphics
  • Neelima Jammigumpula, Lead Analyst/Database
  • Karolina Maneva-Jakimoska, Analyst/Java Dev.
  • Steve Winner, Information Technology/Web Dev.
  • Gabriel Logan, Analyst/Web Services
  • Debbie Paul, Functional Analyst
  • Stan Ustymenko, Graduate Assistant
  • Wei Zhang, Graduate Assistant
  • Ken Moriuchi, Graduate Assistant
  • Cynthia Gaitros, Technical Writer

5
Acknowledgments
  • Sponsors

6
Outline
  • Acknowledgements
  • The Motivation
  • The System
  • A Collaborative Environment
  • Creating Collections
  • Creating Annotations
  • The User Trials
  • Future Directions

7
The Motivation
Humans have interpreted images for far longer
than we have interpreted vocabulary-rich
language.
8
The Motivation
Humans have interpreted images for far longer
than we have interpreted vocabulary-rich
language. Describing patterns in nature often
requires a specialized vocabulary that might form
a barrier to communication even among colleagues
in the same Biology Department.
9
The Motivation
10
The Motivation
Humans have interpreted images for far longer
than we have interpreted vocabulary-rich
language. Describing patterns in nature often
requires a specialized vocabulary that might form
a barrier to communication even among colleagues
in the same Biology Department. Pictures often
have greater information content than the words
that we use to describe them (or the database
weve designed to describe them).
11
The Motivation
12
The Motivation
Humans have interpreted images for far longer
than we have interpreted vocabulary-rich
language. Describing patterns in nature often
requires a specialized vocabulary that might form
a barrier to communication even among colleagues
in the same Biology Department. Pictures often
have greater information content than the words
that we use to describe them (or the database
weve designed to describe them). Capturing
images digitally permits mathematical abstraction
and comparison of the patterns.
13
The Motivation
Humans have interpreted images for far longer
than we have interpreted vocabulary-rich
language. Describing patterns in nature often
requires a specialized vocabulary that might form
a barrier to communication even among colleagues
in the same Biology Department. Pictures often
have greater information content than the words
that we use to describe them (or the database
weve designed to describe them). Capturing
images digitally permits mathematical abstraction
and comparison of the patterns. Capturing images
digitally allows comparisons of objects that
would perhaps not be otherwise compared.
14
The Motivation
15
The Motivation
Humans have interpreted images for far longer
than we have interpreted vocabulary-rich
language. Describing patterns in nature often
requires a specialized vocabulary that might form
a barrier to communication even among colleagues
in the same Biology Department. Pictures often
have greater information content than the words
that we use to describe them. Capturing images
digitally permits mathematical abstraction and
comparison of the patterns. Capturing images
digitally allows comparisons of objects that
would perhaps not be otherwise compared. Often
we base our conclusions on many more images than
make it into print.
16
The Motivation
And, when properly backed up, morphological
information from specimens can be preserved in
images through regional disasters that destroy
the physical specimens.
17
Outline
  • Acknowledgements
  • The Motivation
  • The System
  • A Collaborative Environment
  • Creating Collections
  • Creating Annotations
  • The User Trials
  • Future Directions

18
The System (version 2.5)
19
The System (version 2.5)
20
The System Collaboration
21
The System Collaboration
Working Data Set Under Review Max. time under
review 5 years. Released
22
The System Create Collection
23
The System Create Collection
24
The System Create Collection
25
The System Create Collection
26
The System Create Collection
27
The System Create Collection
28
The System Create Collection
(not actual mouse-over for this specimen)
29
The System Create Collection
30
The System Create Collection
31
The System Create Collection
32
The System Create Collection
33
The System Create Collection
34
The System Create Collection
35
The System Create Annotation
36
The System Create Annotation
37
The System Create Annotation
38
The System Create Annotation
39
The System Create Annotation
40
The System Create Annotation
41
The System Create Annotation
42
The System Create Annotation
43
The System Create Annotation
44
The System Create Annotation
45
The System Create Annotation
46
The System Create Annotation
47
The System Create Annotation
48
Outline
  • Acknowledgements
  • The Motivation
  • The System
  • A Collaborative Environment
  • Creating Collections
  • Creating Annotations
  • The User Trials
  • Future Directions

49
User Trials
  • Ongoing trials
  • How can current functionality be better
    implemented?
  • What new functionality would improve the
    workflow?
  • Can images be successfully used for this task?
  • Two groups
  • Remote participants (variety of genera)
  • Visiting participants (Carex)

50
Outline
  • Acknowledgements
  • The Motivation
  • The System
  • A Collaborative Environment
  • Creating Collections
  • Creating Annotations
  • The User Trials
  • Future Directions

51
Future Directions
  • Communication of determination annotations to
    collection holding specimen (or rather,
    collections specimen db).

52
Future Directions
  • Communication of determination annotations to
    collection holding specimen (or rather,
    collections specimen db).
  • Expand types of objects that can be
    included/represented in collections.

53
Future Directions
  • Communication of determination annotations to
    collection holding specimen (or rather,
    collections specimen db).
  • Expand types of objects that can be
    included/represented in collections.
  • Report generation of specimen images (and other
    resources) examined.

54
Future Directions
  • Communication of determination annotations to
    collection holding specimen (or rather,
    collections specimen db).
  • Expand types of objects that can be
    included/represented in collections.
  • Report generation of specimen images (and other
    resources) examined.
  • Tools for comparing specimen-based taxonomic
    concepts of users.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com