Philippe TRAINAR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Philippe TRAINAR

Description:

An impressive work has been done on pricing longevity ... avian flu) Nature of a cat event. No structural problem for transferring it to the market (cf. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: franklin1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philippe TRAINAR


1
  • Philippe TRAINAR
  • Chief Economist Officer of SCOR

Workshop INSEE-CREST AXA Fondation du
Risque 1st of February 2008
2
  • An impressive work has been done on pricing
    longevity / mortality risks / bonds but why
    should we issue longevity / mortality bonds ?

2
3
Why securitization of longevity / mortality risk
?
  • Dispersion of risks
  • A complement after pooling of risks, i.e. after
    (re)insurance
  • A way for further reducing the risk premium
  • Fragmentation of risk gt risk premium ? 0
  • But not operational as long as (re)insurer are
    providing the liquidity
  • Clearing of the market
  • Imperfect information of insurers
  • A way to force the market to reveal further
    information
  • Emergence of unknown pooling dimension
  • But not operational as long as (re)insurer are
    providing the liquidity

4
Main problems of mortality / longevity bonds
  • Problems of mortality risk
  • Deviation of the trend (cf. consequence of
    obesity)
  • A progressive risk gt no intertemporal pooling
  • A contained risk (quantitatively) gt transfer
    easily conceivable
  • One off deviation (cf. avian flu)
  • Nature of a cat event
  • No structural problem for transferring it to the
    market (cf. graph)
  • Problems of longevity risk
  • One off deviation an opportunity not a risk
  • Deviation of the trend (cf. unanticipitated
    lengthening of life)
  • A progressive risk gt no intertemporal pooling
  • A systemic risk gt pooling with other risks
    difficult
  • Everyone potentially concerned
  • On its asset as well as its liability sides
  • A massive risk (pensions funds 20 trillions
    1/3 financial market)

5
Life bonds an increasing volume of mortality
Source Sigma research, swissRe
6
Main problems of mortality / longevity bonds
  • Dimensions of mortality risk
  • Deviation of the trend (cf. consequence of
    obesity)
  • A progressive risk gt no intertemporal pooling
  • A contained risk (quantitatively) gt transfer
    easily conceivable
  • One off deviation (cf. avian flu)
  • Nature of a cat event
  • No structural problem for transferring it to the
    market (cf. graph)
  • Problems of longevity risk
  • One off deviation an opportunity not a risk
  • Deviation of the trend (cf. unanticipitated
    lengthening of life)
  • A progressive risk gt no intertemporal pooling
  • A systemic risk gt pooling with other risks
    difficult
  • Everyone potentially concerned
  • On its asset as well as its liability sides
  • A massive risk (pensions funds 20 trillions
    1/3 financial market)

7
Who may be counterparty for longevity ?
  • Institutional investors ?
  • Pension funds
  • Main source of longevity risk transfer
  • But internal capacity to manage intergenerational
    risk sharing
  • (Re)insurance
  • Hedging (longevity and mortality) pooling
    capacities but limited
  • Potential source of longevity risk transfer
  • Financial markets ?
  • Drug, leisure, LTC companies gt limited
    capacities
  • Households gt potential sellers because of
    increased longevity
  • Longevity main source of households saving
  • Asset selling gt fall of assets prices
    Increase of interest rates
  • Other actors ?
  • Governments ?
  • Overexposed to longevity but able to impose
    intergenerational solidarity
  • Limited capacity through sovereign wealth fund
    (from DC EC)
  • Young generations ?
  • More borrowers than lenders
  • As much exposed to longevity risk as older
    generations

8
How much transfer of longevity risk ?
  • All longevity deviation ?
  • Prior use of own and (re)insurance absorption
    capacities
  • No sufficient counterparties
  • Only possible for SMIs
  • Longevity gap in relation to deviation vs trend
    ?
  • Manageable for random gaps
  • Need an independent longevity index
  • Need to isolate exclude the antiselection part
    of the risk
  • Probably insufficiently ambitious
  • Gap with regard to a standardised risk sharing
    formula ?
  • Give incentive for exploiting internal capacities
  • Highly complex to be design and accepted
  • Probably more accurate but difficult
  • Hybrid longevity financial risk debt (cf.
    Pauline Barrieu) ?
  • More attractive for investor
  • Less attractive for issuer because of
    longevity-financial correlation
  • Different kinds of hybrid product to be tested

9
  • Four successive steps
  • - Exploit all internal capacities of
    intergenerational pooling
  • - Exploit all reinsurance pooling capacities
  • - Think about securitizing part (which one) of
    the residual
  • - Search for potential hybrid product

9
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com