New Source Review for Air Toxics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

New Source Review for Air Toxics

Description:

Evaluation of the health risk impacts to nearby exposed individuals (receptors) ... If health risk calculations show that a ... Check for most recent version! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: judyb99
Category:
Tags: air | new | review | source | toxics

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Source Review for Air Toxics


1
New Source Review for Air Toxics
  • November 2, 2005

Peter J. Moore Yorke Engineering 949-248-8490 x24
2
What is ToxicsNew Source Review (NSR)?
  • Evaluation of the health risk impacts to nearby
    exposed individuals (receptors)
  • Calculate health risk indices
  • Health risk indices cannot exceed thresholds

3
When is Toxics NSR Applied?
  • When a new or modified source causes an increase
    in Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC), Toxics NSR is
    required
  • SCAQMD Rule 1401 New Source Review of Toxic Air
    Contaminants
  • Also Rule 219 permit-exempt equipment if health
    risk may exceed thresholds

4
Implications of Toxics NSR
  • Permit denied if calculated health risk is too
    high
  • Public notice required if cancer risk increase
    exceeds 1 in one million
  • CEQA is triggered if combined project cancer risk
    increase exceeds 10 in one million
  • May require Environmental Impact Report

5
Implications (continued)
  • May set permit conditions
  • Example Natural Gas Engine
  • Toxic Air Contaminants from internal combustion
    must be evaluated for Toxics NSR
  • If health risk calculations show that a limit on
    operation is necessary to stay below health risk
    thresholds, a daily or monthly limit on natural
    gas use may become a permit condition
  • Carefully consider all possible toxic emissions
    for any new source

6
What Toxics are Considered?
  • Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC) are listed in Rules
    1401 and 1402
  • Carcinogenic 153 compounds
  • Acute 58 chemicals
  • Chronic 125 chemicals
  • Risk factors are assigned by the California EPA
    Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
    (OEHHA)
  • New TACs being added over time

7
Health Risk Index - MICR
  • Maximum Individual Cancer Risk (MICR)
  • Long term impact
  • Probability that an individual will contract
    cancer over 70 years (resident receptor) or 40
    years (commercial receptor)
  • Must be lt 1 x 10-5 (10 in one million) for new
    equipment
  • lt1 x 10-6 to avoid public notice

8
Health Risk Index - Chronic
  • Chronic Hazard Index (HIC)
  • Long term, non-cancer health effects
  • Must be lt 1.0 for all target organs

9
Health Risk Index - Acute
  • Acute Hazard Index (HIA)
  • Short term (1-hour average) health effects
  • Must be lt 1.0 for all target organs

10
What Are Target Organs?
  • Specific systems in the human body that are
    affected by TACs

11
Risk Assessment Tiers
  • Tier 1 Screening Emission Levels
  • Use Table 1A to check if emission rates are below
    thresholds
  • Tier 2 Screening Risk Assessment
  • Use Tables 2-10 to determine dispersion factors,
    etc.
  • Tier 3 Screening Dispersion Modeling
  • Use SCREEN3 to determine dispersion factors
  • Tier 4 Detailed Risk Assessment
  • Use HARP for highest fidelity model, full
    meteorology

Less Conservative
12
Tier I Screening Evaluation
  • Max Annual Controlled Emissions (tons/year)
  • Max Hourly Controlled (lbs/hr)
  • Look up tables in Risk Assessment Procedures
    for Rules 1401 and 212
  • Check for most recent version!
  • If emissions are lower than screening levels,
    Rule 1401 is satisfied. If not, proceed to Tier
    II

13
Tier II Health Risk Assessment
  • Max Annual Controlled Emissions (tons/year)
  • Max Hourly Controlled (lbs/hr)
  • Look up tables in Risk Assessment Procedures
    for Rules 1401 and 212
  • If health risk indices lower than thresholds,
    Rule 1401 is satisfied. If not, proceed to Tier
    III

14
Tier II Risk Assessment for MICR
  • MICR CP x DI x MP
  • CP cancer potency factor (mg/kg-day)-1
  • DI Dose inhalation (mg/kg-day)
  • DI Cair x DBR x EVF x 10-6
  • Cair concentration in air (µg/m3)
  • DBR daily breathing rate (L/kg-day)
  • EVR Exposure value factor (unitless)
  • 1 x10-6 convert µg to mg(10-3 mg/µg), liters to
    cubic meters (10-3 m3/l)
  • Cair Qtons x X/Q x AFann x MET
  • Qtons Emission rate (tons/year)
  • X/Q Dispersion Factor ((µg/m3)/(ton/yr)
  • AFann Annual Averaging factor
  • MET meteorological correction factor (unitless)
  • MP multipathway factor (unitless)
  • MICR CP x ((Qtons x X/Q x AFann x MET) x DBR
    x EVF x 10-6) x MP

15
Chronic Index Equation
HIC Chronic hazard index (calculated for each
target organ) ?TAC Sum of the contribution for
each Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC) QyrTAC Emission
rate of each TAC (tons/year) X/Q Annual average
dispersion factor (?g/m3)/(ton/year) RELTAC Chroni
c Reference Exposure Level (?g/m3) for each
TAC MP Multi-pathway adjustment factor
(n.d.) MET Meteorological correction factor (n.d.)
16
Acute Index Equation
HIA Acute hazard index (calculated for each
target organ) ?TAC Sum of the contribution for
each Toxic Air Contaminant (TAC) QhrTAC Emission
rate of each TAC (lb/hour) X/Qhr Hourly average
dispersion factor (?g/m3)/(lb/hour) RELTAC Acute
Reference Exposure Level (?g/m3) for each TAC
17
Cancer Burden Calculation
  • Only Needed if MICR gt10-6
  • Estimate Area (km2) with Risk gt10-6
  • Multiply Area by 4,000 - 7,000 persons/ km2
  • Multiply Total Persons by MICR
  • If Burden gt0.5
  • More detailed calculations or modeling required

18
Tier III Health Risk Assessment
  • Similar to Tier II
  • Use SCREEN3 to determine dispersion factors (X/Q)
    instead of from tables
  • Exhaust temperature and velocity are included
  • Simple building downwash effects
  • Single source
  • Equation is the same
  • If health risk indices lower than thresholds,
    Rule 1401 is satisfied. If not, proceed to Tier
    IV

19
Tier IV Health Risk Assessment
  • Most detailed health risk assessment
  • Requires details of building dimensions, local
    topography, and local meteorology
  • Use Hot Spots Analysis and Reporting Program
    (HARP) to calculate dispersion factors and health
    risk indices
  • Free download from CARB website
    www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/harp.htm
  • Multiple sources in different locations

20
TACs from Natural Gas
  • Ventura County APCD did testing of internal
    external combustion equipment in 1995 for TACs
  • Ventura Factors can be used for emission
    factors for external combustion only
  • Use EPAs AP-42 emission factors for internal
    combustion

21
TACs from External Combustion
As determined by Ventura APCD
22
TACs from Internal CombustionEPA AP-42
Emission Factors, Table 3.2-3
23
Rule 1401 Limitations
  • MICR of 1 X 10-6 Without T-BACT
  • MICR of 1 X 10-5 With T-BACT
  • Cancer Burden, excess cancer cases in the
    population subject to a risk greater than
    (1 x 10-6), of 0.5
  • Acute and Chronic Hazard Index of lt 1
  • T-BACT Criteria Similar to Existing BACT

24
Rule 1401 Exemptions
  • Emergency Internal Combustion Engines
  • Modifications with no increase in toxic emissions
  • Functionally identical replacement
  • Contemporaneous Risk Reductions
  • No MICR increase at any location gt1x10-6, and
  • Reduction occurs within 100 m of new equipment
  • Alternative Hazard Index lt10

25
Example
  • Facility adding three large, natural-gas fueled,
    cogeneration engines
  • Four existing emergency diesels
  • Nearby residents
  • Each engine passed Rule 1401 with MICR of 9 in
    one million
  • CEQA triggered due to combined MICR of 27 in one
    million

26
Example (continued)
  • We calculated that cogeneration engines resulted
    in less usage of diesel backup engines
  • Diesel health risk is high
  • Contemporaneous health risk reduction allowed
    project to proceed without requiring an
    Environmental Impact Report

27
Risk is Dependent On
  • Source and Receptor Location
  • Emission Rate
  • Emission Species
  • Meteorology
  • Stack Parameters
  • Operating Schedule

28
Strategies
  • Locate equipment away from adjacent residents or
    workers
  • Raise stack height
  • Perform detailed modeling to determine risk
    impacts to specific receptors
  • Source test for actual toxic emissions
  • Tests showed high destruction of PAH across
    catalyst
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com