Accomplishments Year 2 and Plans Year 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Accomplishments Year 2 and Plans Year 3

Description:

... physics, mesh, solve, reports, and post-processing) ... Post-processing. Wall friction force. Select Geometry. Boundary. Conditions. Flow Properties ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: drericgp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accomplishments Year 2 and Plans Year 3


1
Accomplishments Year 2 and Plans Year 3
  • Fred Stern, Marian Muste and Tao Xing
  • IIHR-Hydroscience Engineering
  • 100 Hydraulics Laboratory
  • The University of Iowa
  • http//www.iihr.uiowa.edu/istue
  • http//css.engineering.uiowa.edu/fluids/

ISTUE Meeting 3 Iowa City, 11-12 May 2004
2
Outline
  • Accomplishments year 2
  • Development of CFD educational interface
  • Implementation of CFD educational interface
  • Self-evaluations on CFD educational interface
  • Proposed improvements for CFD educational
    interface, exercise Notes, and classroom lectures
  • Development and implementation of hands-on EFD
    labs
  • Self-evaluations on hands-on EFD labs
  • Proposed improvements for hands-on EFD testing,
    exercise notes, and classroom lectures
  • Plans year 3

3
Accomplishments year 2
  • Development of CFD educational interface for
    hands-on student experience for pipe, nozzle, and
    airfoil flows
  • Design for teaching CFD methodology and
    procedures, implementation based on site testing
    at partner universities, and evaluation
  • Further development, implementation and
    evaluation of hands-on student learning
    experience with modern facilities, measurement
    systems, and uncertainty analysis (Iowa only)
  • Papers (two separate papers in ASEE 2004 annual
    conference, and one paper in ASME 2004) and
    posters

4
Development of CFD educational interface
  • Proof of concept (1999-2002) Use FLUENT
    directly, lengthy detailed instructions, not
    facilitate options for modeling, numerical
    methods, and VV.
  • FlowLab 1.0 (2002) General purpose CFD
    templates, enabling students to solve predefined
    exercises, pipe and airfoil exercises focused.
  • Findings (2002)
  • 1. Different specialized CFD templates
    implied different CFD process and did not
    facilitate site testing.
  • 2. Exercises lacked options and depth
  • 3. Overly automated.
  • 4. Non-user-friendly interface
  • 5. Performance accuracy and flow
    visualization were substandard
  • FlowLab 1.1 (2003) CFD templates were
    generalized with CFD Process (geometry, physics,
    mesh, solve, reports, and post-processing), which
    is automated following a step-by-step approach
    and seamlessly leads students through setup and
    solution of IBVP at hand.

5
Development of CFD educational interface (design
specifications)
  • CFD educational interface designed to teach
    students CFD methodology (modeling and numerical
    methods) and procedures through interactive
    implementation for engineering applications
  • CFD Process is automated following a step-by-step
    approach, which seamlessly leads students through
    setup and solution of IBVP (Initial Boundary
    Value Problem) for application at hand.
  • CFD Process mirrors actual engineering practice
  • A dynamically updated sketch window monitoring
    progress and enabling input parameter
    specifications is planned for next FlowLab
    generation

6
CFD educational interface (FlowLab 1.1)
CFD Process
Contour and vectors window
XY plots
Sketch window
Fig. 1. Screen dump for the pipe flow CFD template
7
CFD educational interface, contd
Fig. 2 Flow chart for the pipe flow CFD template.
8
CFD educational interface, contd
Clarky
NACA12
LS(1)0417
Import data
Fig. 3 Flow chart for the airfoil flow CFD
template.
9
Implementation (goals for complementary EFD, CFD,
and UA labs)
  • Educational goals for lectures, problems
    solving, and the EFD, CFD, and UA labs were
    developed and used as guidelines for course and
    laboratory development, implementation, and
    evaluation.

10
TM used for introductory fluid mechanics course
(EFD/CFD lab materials)
Table 1 TM used for introductory fluid mechanics
course at Iowa (EFD/CFD lab materials)
http//css.engineering.uiowa.edu/fluids
11
Self-Evaluation (CFD)
  • Self-evaluation performed based on analysis of
    the data from students performance and comments
    from their CFD reports, college of engineering
    EASY survey, and Course Outcomes Assessments
    Administered by center for evaluation and
    Assessment.

12
Self-Evaluation (CFD)
  • CFD positive comments
  • Students appreciated the hands-on learning
    process by using a step-by-step method through
    the educational interface
  • Potential improvments
  • 1. FlowLab develop user-friendlier interface
    and
  • increase the depth of CFD templates
  • 2. Lab reports Combine CFD and EFD lab
    report and
  • TAs grading is too liberal
  • 3. Lab design more interactive and effective
    use of
  • PreLab and lab time
  • 4. Hands-on more access to FlowLab and
    one-person
  • one-computer

13
CFD lecture and exercise notes
  • All faculty partners inputs can help develop a
    common CFD lecture that can be distributed and
    used by more than one school
  • Exercise notes will be modified to be consistent
    with the advanced level CFD templates with
    improved educational interface

14
Conclusions and future work (CFD)
  • Project is successful in development of CFD
    educational interface for pipe, nozzle, and
    airfoil flows, including design for teaching CFD
    methodology and procedures, implementation and
    evaluation
  • Future work (CFD)
  • 1. Improved user interface
  • 2. Extensions for additional active options
    and advanced
  • level (next 2 slides)
  • 3. Extensions for more general wider
    applications CFD
  • templates for internal and external
    flows
  • 4. Extensions for student individual
  • investigation/discovery
  • 5. Smaller lab groups with emphasis hands-on
    activities
  • and remote access via college
    computer/internet
  • 6. Improved implementation, site testing,
    and evaluation
  • 7. FLUENT will disseminate current TM.

15
Conclusions and future work, contd
Axial velocity profile
Total pressure drop
Point (x,y)
Axial velocity profile
Total pressure drop
Point (x,y)
Red color illustrates the options unavailable
in the introductory level template
Unsteady
Steady
Fig. 4. Flow chart for combined 2D axisymmetric
advanced internal flow template
16
Conclusions and future work, contd
Lift coefficient
Drag coefficient
Wake velocity profile
Pressure coefficient
Point (x,y,z) in wake
Lift coefficient
Drag coefficient
Wake velocity profile
Pressure coefficient
Point (x,y,z) in wake
Unsteady
Unsteady or steady
Steady
Red color illustrates the options unavailable
in the introductory level template
Fig. 5. Flow chart for combined 2D advanced
external flow template
17
EFD Progress Report
18
Design of EFD labs
The objectives of this experiment are to
determine the kinematic viscosity of a fluid, the
uncertainty of the measurement, and to compare
the measured result with the manufacturers value.
Experiment 1 Viscosity
While most steps of the EFD process addressed,
the experiment emphasizes UA.
19
Design of EFD labs (Experiment 2 Pipe flow)
The objectives of this experiment are to measure
friction factor and velocity distribution in
rough and smooth pipes and compare the results
with benchmark data.
All steps of the EFD process addressed with
special emphasis on the student introduction to
modern data acquisition systems (LabView).
20
Design of EFD labs (Exp. 3 flow around an
airfoil)
The goals of the airfoil experiment is to measure
the surface pressure distribution and lift
coefficient for an airfoil at a specified Re and
various angles of attack and compare the results
with benchmark data.
All steps of the EFD Process addressed with
emphasis on hands-on activities (model
installation), calibration of modern equipment
(pressure transducer, load cell), and programming
of computer-based data acquisition systems.
21
EFD implementation
22
Self-Evaluation (EFD)
Data from students performance and comments from
their EFD reports, College of Engineering EASY
survey
23
Self-Evaluation (EFD)
  • EFD positive comments
  • 1. Students appreciate hands-on EFD and UA
    labs, including
  • use of modern facilities and MS that
    they could relate to
  • real-life applications
  • Potential improvements
  • 1. use of smaller lab groups and more
    workstations to enhance direct involvement
  • 2. effective use of the lab time
    (eliminating prelabs) to increase time for
    actually performing the experiments
  • 3. improvements of EFD lecture and lab
    materials, especially UA better instruction and
    concise instructions for lab reports
  • 4. TAs reports grading is to liberal and
    does not break the grades to different categories
  • 5. improvements of the experiments to
    include more physical processes (e.g., pipe
    transitions and alternative external flow
    geometries), greater depth in certain steps of
    EFD process (e.g., use of LabView), and more
    advanced MS (laser based)

24
Conclusions and future work (EFD)
  • Project successful in developing, implementing
    and evaluating EFD and UA labs for hands-on
    student learning experience with modern
    facilities, measurement systems, and uncertainty
    analysis, including complementary CFD labs
  • Future work (EFD)
  • 1. Additional course sections and
  • workstations for smaller lab groups
  • 2. Use lab time more effectively
  • 3. Improved and additional
  • experiment

25
Plans year 3
  • Improvements of educational interface
  • Complete, implement, and evaluate proposed
    improvements
  • Development of advanced level CFD templates
  • Complete plan, implement, and evaluate site
    testing
  • Publications
  • Initiate plans for ND proposal
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com