BPD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

BPD

Description:

A nationwide 'Just Say No To Toast' campaign, complete celebrity TV spots and bumper stickers. ... Manner Style: Confidence, Confidence, Confidence. Tone of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: mrude
Category:
Tags: bpd

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BPD


1
BPD
  • British Parliamentary Debating
  • By
  • Lio Kaufman

2
Introduction
  • Who am I?
  • Study at the University of Glamorgan in Wales
  • I am the 1st Chair of our Debating Society
  • Agnes Debating Partner in the Welsh Mace
  • What am I Going to Tell You?
  • Present a Basic Introduction to BPD
  • The Role of the positions and their Structure
  • Fulfilling your Roles in the eyes of the judge

3
What is BPD?
A competitive sport whereby 4 teams in opposing
sides try to convince an audience that a point of
view regarding a controversial issue is better
than the alternative provided.
  • Discuss v Debate
  • Discuss Negotiate or compromise conflicting
    points of view in order to cooperate.
  • Debate Highlight the opposing opinions
    surrounding a topic as a tool for decision making
    and analysis.

4
Terminology
  • This House
  • The British House of Common
  • The EU (UN?... US?)
  • Motions
  • The given topic or subject being talked about.
  • Potential Areas Covered
  • Social / Moral
  • Political
  • Entertainment (Sports / Art)
  • Speakers Take Turns 5 min 7 min

5
Debate Structure
Proposition
Opposition
Leader of the Opposition or 1st Speaker 1st Opp.
Prime Minister or 1st Speaker 1st Prop.
2
1
1st Prop.
1st Opp.
Deputy of the Opposition or 2nd Speaker 1st Opp.
Deputy Prime Minister or 2nd Speaker 1st Prop.
3
4
Member of the Opposition or 1st Speaker 2nd Opp.
Member of Government or 1st Speaker 2nd Prop.

6
5
2nd Prop.
2nd Opp.
Government Chief Whip or 2nd Speaker 2nd Prop.
7
8
Opposition Chief Whip or 2nd Speaker 2nd Opp.
Points of Information P.O.I
6
3 Types of Debates
  • Factual debate Is it or is it not the case?
    Did it or did it not happen?
  • THBT Germany is to blame for WW2
  • THBT the capitalist system is doomed to collapse
  • THBT our education system is a failure
  • Value debate What should our values be why?
    Is it Better or Worse for us (and / or Society
    as a whole?)
  • THBT the sanctity of life ought to be valued over
    the quality of life
  • THBT parents should have the final say over the
    medical treatment of their children
  • THBT we should have more freedom
  • Policy Debate What is the problem and how do we
    fix it?
  • THW ban smoking
  • THW outlaw experimentation on chimpanzees
  • THW impose democracy

7
3 Types of Motions
  • Closed Motion
  • THBT there is no such thing as universal human
    rights
  • THBT mandatory drug testing of public officials
    is justified
  • THBT child labour can never be justified
  • Semi (Opened / Closed) Motion
  • This House supports privatisation
  • This House would adopt a green agenda
  • This House believes that art is a diversion
  • Open Motion
  • THBT we have no reverse
  • THW gain a burst of knowledge
  • THB in the more the Merrier

8
Prime Minister
  • Role
  • Setup the Debate
  • Present the Most Important Arguments (Normally 2)
  • Structure
  • Definition / Introduction
  • Sign Post
  • Present 1st Substantive
  • Present 2nd Substantive
  • Conclusion

9
Prime Minister
  • Definition
  • Provide Sufficient Background
  • Define Contentious Terminology
  • Identify The Problem (Why is it a problem?)
  • Provide Policy (Find a Solution)
  • Explain Who dose What and When,
  • How does it solve the problem,
  • Why is this a better situation than before
  • Who is going to be affected by this and how is
    that better?
  • (Easiest Solution is to Provide an Existing
    Model)
  • E.g.
  • THW use children in the front line during war
    times

10
Prime Minister
  • Sign-Posting Conclusions
  • Rhetoric Rule of 3
  • Letting others know what you are going to say.
  • Explaining Associating the topic.
  • Reminding them of what you said.
  • Silly say easy to follow

1
2
3
4
6
5
7
8
11
Prime Minister
  • Substantive
  • Title
  • Premises
  • Inference
  • Conclusion
  • Supportive Statistics / Examples
  • Link Back
  • Example
  • Legalise Drugs

12
Supporting the Substantive
  • Research on bread indicates that
  • More than 98 percent of convicted felons are
    bread users.
  • Fully HALF of all children who grow up in
    bread-consuming households score below average on
    standardized tests.
  • More than 90 percent of violent crimes are
    committed within 24 hours of eating bread.
  • Bread is an addictive substance. Subjects
    deprived of bread and given only water to eat
    begged for bread after as little as two days.
  • Bread is often a "gateway" food item, leading the
    user to "harder" items such as butter, jelly,
    peanut butter, and even cold cuts.
  • Primitive tribal societies that have no bread
    exhibit a low incidence of cancer, Alzheimer's,
    Parkinson's disease, and osteoporosis.
  • Newborn babies can choke on bread.

Source http//www.eskimo.com/spban/bread.html
13
Policy
  • In light of these frightening statistics, it
  • has been proposed that the following
  • bread restrictions be made
  • No sale of bread to minors.
  • A nationwide "Just Say No To Toast" campaign,
    complete celebrity TV spots and bumper stickers.
  • A 300 percent federal tax on all bread to pay for
    all the societal ills we might associate with
    bread.
  • No animal or human images, nor any primary
    colours (which may appeal to children) may be
    used to promote bread usage.
  • The establishment of "Bread-free" zones around
    schools.

Source http//www.eskimo.com/spban/bread.html
14
Leader of the Opposition
  • Role
  • Set the tone of the Opposition
  • Following the 1st Speaker
  • Good / Clear / Structured
  • Bad / Unclear / Unstructured
  • No Debate / Truism / Ridiculous

15
Leader of the Opposition
  • Following a Good Prime-Minister
  • Structure
  • Sign Post
  • Reiterate
  • Rebut
  • Present Substantive
  • Conclusion

16
Leader of the Opposition
  • Following a Good Prime-Minister
  • Rebut
  • Time line Now ? Action ? Then
  • Wont work / Impractical / cant be done
  • Wont solve the problem
  • Outcome / Side-Effects worse than Solution.
  • E.g. Co-operations Control The Future
  • Big Blue Ball
  • E.g. Child labour can never be justified
  • E.g. Abolish Capital Punishment

17
Leader of the Opposition
  • Bad / Unclear Prime-Minister
  • Clarify
  • No Problem Exists / Factually inaccurate
  • Suggest Most Logical Conflict
  • Rebut it as before
  • Must be logical criteria
  • E.g. Africa in UN Security Council
  • Not Relevant to the Debate
  • E.g. THW Lift the arms embargo off China

18
Leader of the Opposition
  • Following a Truism / Ridiculous Def
  • E.g. THBT Multiculturalism has Failed
  • E.g. THBT the poor will always exist
  • Definition Debate
  • Challenge the Definition (Prop it)
  • 2 debates running in tandem
  • The Right Definition wins the debate
  • (Not Necessarily the best arguments)

19
The Deputies
  • Role
  • Develop the Case
  • Rebut the Opponents
  • Structure
  • Sign Post
  • Rebut
  • Reinforce
  • Add Substantive
  • Conclusion

2
1
4
3
6
5
7
8
20
Extensions
  • Role
  • Extension Shift the focus of the Debate
  • Deeper Analysis
  • Different Point of View (Global / Local)
  • Additional (Better) Arguments
  • Must be the same Motion !
  • Structure
  • Sign Post
  • Rebut
  • Extension (Normally 2 Substantives)
  • Conclusion

2
1
4
3
6
5
7
8
21
Extensions
  • Deeper Analysis
  • Who does it affect?
  • What can / will they do about it?
  • Who is going against them?
  • Is this better or worse Why?
  • Different Point of View
  • Global / National / Local
  • National / Conservative / Labour / Liberal
  • Communist / Socialist / Capitalist
  • Show a deeper understanding of the motion and its
    issues

2
1
4
3
6
5
7
8
22
Extensions
  • Additional (Better) Arguments
  • PEESTLE
  • Political
  • Economical
  • Environmental
  • Social
  • Technological
  • Legal
  • Ecological
  • Why is this point more important?

2
1
4
3
6
5
7
8
23
Summators
  • Role
  • Show Your side (Team) won the debate
  • Speaker by Speaker
  • 3 Main Themes
  • Time line Now ? Action ? Then
  • New Information
  • Answer a rebuttal or P.O.I.
  • Give a new analogy / example (to an existing
    issue / argument)

2
1
4
3
6
5
8
7
24
Judging Criteria
  • Manner Matter Method
  • Manner Style
  • Confidence, Confidence, Confidence
  • Tone of Voice Pace, Pitch Pause
  • Body Language Stand Upright, Eye Contact, Hand
    Gestures
  • Energy Level
  • Matter Content
  • Backup / Support to Argument
  • Validity of Argument
  • Level of Analysis / Understanding
  • Method Strategy
  • Timing
  • Structure / Signposting
  • P.O.I (Taken Received)
  • Teamwork

25
Thank You.
  • Any Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com