Wireline Post 1996 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Wireline Post 1996

Description:

Amendment of 1934 Communications Act. Very broad, limited in scope. Competition Oriented ... Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002)? Concerns about TELRIC ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: paul126
Learn more at: https://www.msu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wireline Post 1996


1
Wireline Post 1996
  • TC 310
  • May 20, 2008

2
But First...
  • Questions From Reviews
  • Invisible Hand
  • Convergence
  • Economies of density
  • Direct v Indirect network effects
  • Cooperative federalism
  • Unitary and Confederation (democracies)?
  • Who wants some extra credit?

3
Overview of 1996 Telecom Act
  • Amendment of 1934 Communications Act
  • Very broad, limited in scope
  • Competition Oriented
  • Enforceable

4
Deregulation of LEC
  • 1984 Modified Final Judgment
  • Competition in LD and data services
  • Local is monopoly
  • Why?
  • 1996 Act attempts to end monopolies period
  • ILECs vs. CLECs
  • Leased vs. Facilities-based competition
  • Big CLECs vs. mass market customers

5
Lifting of Restrictions
  • ILECs (BOCs) freed from Modified Final Judgment
  • Compete in long distance big prize
  • Have to convince FCC they are in accordance with
    sections 251 and 252 of 1996 Act
  • Specific checklist
  • Most detail in Act

6
Checklist
  • Duty to interconnect
  • Duty not to impede network interconnectivity
  • Duty to offer resale services
  • Number portability
  • Local Dialing Parity
  • Access to Rights-of-Way
  • Reciprocal Compensation
  • Unbundle

7
But wait, there's more
  • Collocation
  • 911 services
  • ILECs (BOCs) must create affiliate company for
    other market
  • Section 252 states how to negotiate, mediate, get
    approval for previous requirements
  • ILEC then goes to FCC and asks to enter new
    markets (Section 271).

8
TELRIC Pricing
  • Wholesale rates will be based on actual costs
  • Forward projections, not based on past
  • Total Element Long Run Incremental Cost
  • Not based on actual network, infrastructure
  • What would most efficient, brand new network cost
  • Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002)?
  • Concerns about TELRIC
  • Slows innovation/upkeep
  • State Regulator guideline

9
Punishments
  • Rescind 271 authorization
  • Prevent future marketing of long distance
  • Impose Fines
  • Which is most likely to occur pragmatically?

10
Jurisdiction Concerns
  • Does Dual model still work?
  • 1999 ATT Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board
  • Section 251 and 252 imply federal authority to
    preempt.
  • Cooperative model
  • Distinction between intra and interstate dead
  • FCC creates general rules, States enforce,
    implement

11
Monopoly Concerns
  • Modified Final Judgment imposes line-of-business
    restrictions
  • 1996 Act imposes statutory line-of-business
    restrictions
  • What is the difference?

12
Cross Platform Competition
  • 1996 Act frees up regulatory grounds for cross
    platform competition
  • Internet Service
  • DSL, Cable, Satellite, Wireless
  • Phone Service
  • Traditional v. VoIP
  • Video Services
  • Broadcast, Cable,....telephone?

13
Why Important
  • Fundamental paradigm shift regarding
    telecommunications
  • Law of the Land
  • What's next?
  • Applications of Act to actual scenarios
  • Struggles over authority
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com