Title: RCRA Basics
1- Siting Alternative Energy Facilities
- Politics
- NIMBY
- Legal regimes
- Private law
- Regulation
- Hybrids
- Solutions?
2Politics of Siting
- If someone wanted to build any of the following
in your town, what sorts of things would you
worry about? What concerns might you have? - Land-based (ridge-top) wind farm
- Offshore wind farm
- Solar (PV) generating station
- Solar (concentrated) generating station
- Small hydroelectric facility
3Politics of Siting
Wind turbines 50 KW 5 MW (wind farm turbines
are 700KW-2.5MW)(150-300 ft tall) Wind farms a
few MW to hundreds of MW (20MW farm, approx. 100
acres) Hydro stations a few KW to 18,000MW
(Three Gorges) most in US are lt 30 MW. Niagara
Falls station is gt1000 MW. PV cells
100W-300W/sq.m. Solar concentrating stations 1MW
to 10s of MW. (5 acres per MW)
4- Politics of Siting
- What, if anything, could alleviate your concerns
about the proposed project? - If you ultimately decided to oppose the
construction of the facility, - What sort of action would you take to try to stop
it? - What arguments would you advance in support of
your position?
5Private Law/Torts
Private plaintiff(s) vs. private defendants
- Theories of liability
- private nuisance
- public nuisance
- trespass
- negligence
- negligence per se
- strict liability
Coasean solutions? Coordination problems
6- Do we require licensing of renewable power
projects? - Hydro?
- Geothermal?
- Wind?
- Biomass?
- Solar?
- Is there a good reason why some are regulated by
federal law, others by state law, and still
others primarily by local law only?
Local zoning Preemption federal/state Is
preemption necessary?
7Other Approaches to Siting Regulation Informationa
l regulation Process enhancing (structure
negotiation) regulation Will these work? Or is
a preemptive law the only way to overcome the
NIMBY effect?
8- Politics of Siting Normative questions
- Distributional issues social net benefit vs.
local net benefit - Pareto criterion vs. Kaldor-Hicks criterion
- Factual issues Is SNB gt 0?
- How is the previous question to be answered?
Whose answer is controlling? - Is it even the right question to ask? Are its
premises debateable? Is balancing NB the right
way to look at these issues? - How does law figure into the answers to these
questions?