Institutionalisierte Partizipation in PRSFolgeprozessen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Institutionalisierte Partizipation in PRSFolgeprozessen

Description:

... process; sub-national politics / decentralisation; intra-governmental ... Macro-economics. Sub-national politics. participation. participation. Monitoring ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: waltere
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Institutionalisierte Partizipation in PRSFolgeprozessen


1
Institutionalisation of Participation in PRSP
processes Presentation for the 2nd Meeting
of the ECA PRSP-Learning Group in Brussels, 18-19
November 2002 Dr Walter Eberlei Institute
for Development and Peace (INEF) Gerhard-Mercator-
University Duisburg / Germany November 2002
2
Participation in the PRS cycle
Analysis
participation
Revision (PRSP II)
Strategy (PRSP I)
???
participation
  • Implementation
  • MTEF / Budget
  • Sectoral policies
  • Macro-economics
  • Sub-national politics

???
???
Monitoring
3
Institutionalised participation
Institutionalised Participation can be defined as
a rights-based, structurally integrated, and
legitimised process through which capable
stakeholders shape and share control over
development initiatives. (black Brinkerhoff /
Goldsmith 2001 4)
Participation can be defined as a process through
which stakeholders shape and share control over
development initiatives. (Brinkerhoff / Goldsmith
2001 4)
Institutionalised participation reflects an open
and learning society which develops its own
potentials.
4
Standards for PRS participation
5
PRS processes - critical views
  • Participation plays a crucial role in PRS
    processes, but ad hoc participation dominates.
  • Most participatory processes organised as
    consultations, little collaboration joint
    responsibility is very rare.
  • Civil society broadly involved but with
    limited impact.
  • Govts CSOs invited - but little response, little
    legitimation.
  • Parliaments legitimised for joint
    decision-making, but only marginally
    involved so far.
  • Despite growing ownership IFIs are still
    dominating.

6
Participation Asssessment
  • PRSP countries with
  • strongly institutionalised participation
  • moderate participation
  • weak participation
  • or countries with I-PRSP only
  • Basis
  • 28 indicators for the four participation
    standards rights, structures, legitimacy,
    capacity

7
Good practises few examples
8
Conclusions
  • To strengthen institutionalised participation
  • Formulate standards for participation.
  • Rights. Structures. Legitimacy. Capacity.
  • Organise systematic learning processes.
  • Promote participatory governance
  • ...in all political processes, e.g. PRS cycle
    MTEF and budget process sub-national politics /
    decentralisation intra-governmental
    decision-making.
  • Support parliaments and societal actors.
  • Higher priority for parliaments.
  • Networking between parliament and CSOs.
  • Promotion of civil society.

9
(No Transcript)
10
Participation Asssessment
  • PRSP countries with
  • strongly institutionalised participation BF, UG
  • moderate participation ET, GM, MR, MW, MZ, TZ,
    ZM
  • weak participation GN, RW, NE
  • Basis
  • 28 indicators for the four participation
    standards rights, structures, legitimacy,
    capacity

11
Participation in the PRS cycle
Analysis
participation
Revision (PRSP II)
Strategy (PRSP I)
???
participation
  • Implementation
  • MTEF / Budget
  • Sectoral policies
  • Macro-economics
  • Sub-national politics

???
???
Monitoring
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com