OBSERVATIONAL ESTIMATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

OBSERVATIONAL ESTIMATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTION

Description:

Interiors of massive rotating stars circulation currents bring CNO-cycles ... Gemini South Phoenix high-resolution infrared spectrograph ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: fisica6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OBSERVATIONAL ESTIMATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTION


1
OBSERVATIONAL ESTIMATION OF NITROGEN
PRODUCTION IN UPPER AGB STARS BY HOT-BOTTOM
BURNING Peter Wood Research School of Astronomy
Astrophysics Australian National
University In collaboration with Jenny
McSaveney, Michael Scholz, John Lattanzio Ken
Hinkle (MNRAS, 378, 1089)
2
  • SITES OF NITROGEN PRODUCTION
  • Interiors of massive rotating stars
    circulation currents bring CNO-cycles matter to
    the surface, where it can be lost via stellar
    winds and supernova explosion
  • Hot-Bottom Burning (HBB) in AGB stars with M gt
    3-4 Msun

CN cycle
N up C down
Third dredge-up of primary 12C 4H -gt 4He 34He
-gt 12C
3
Theoretical models are uncertain (convective
overshoot). Observational calibration is required.
N produced by HBB
Iben Truran (1978)
4
Indications that HBB is occurring
Smith Lambert (1990) luminous LMC AGB stars
show enhanced Li line strengths
Brett (1991) CN bandstrengths stronger than
expected for 3rd dredge-up alone
5
N abundance measurements Smith et al (2002) LMC
red giants show evidence for CN cycling only
(first and second dredge-up) Galactic M and S
stars are mostly similar. However, a few S stars
show evidence for enhanced N, but their masses
and luminosities are not known.
6
  • The stars where HBB occurs are near the end of
    their AGB lives.
  • They are large-amplitude, long-period variables.
  • Modelling their atmospheres for spectral analyis
    is difficult.

Magellanic Cloud Long Period Variables
Wood et al. (1983)
7
Gemini South Phoenix high-resolution infrared
spectrograph Spectra taken in service mode in
2002-2003.
8
The bottom 3 (coolest) spectra in the figure are
impossibly difficult didn't attempt to model
them. OH -gt O abundance CN ...
9
CO O abundance -gt C abundance CN C abundance
-gt N abundance
10
THE MODELS
  • Pulsation models to reproduce light curves,
    colours (V-K)
  • Model atmospheres to refine the temperature
    structure of the outer layers, given the density
    and velocity structure of the pulsation model
  • Spectral synthesis given the model atmosphere

L from JK photometry LMC or SMC
distance Teff from V-K colour M to get
correct pulsation period
11
Pulsation and atmosphere models V light curve
from MACHO K light curve from 2.3m
Structure from pulsation models (solid lines)
and atmosphere model (dashed line).
12
A star with a strong shock wave (deep) in the
atmosphere
13
Line emission
  • Two stars could not be modelled because of
    atmospheric shocks.
  • The models show the phases of the light cycle at
    which stars should be observed for successful
    modelling.
  • Only two stars left for abundance analysis!!!!

14
Individual lines were synthesized to get
abundances
15
Carbon down by a factor 5
Nitrogen up by a factor 10
16
The N abundances are larger than can be
produced by CN cycling of pre-existing C N
nuclei require Third Dredge-Up HBB.
17
HV2576 AGB models (6 Msun)
Initial C abund Initial N abund
Domain where N up by 10, C down by 5. Mid-HBB
phase. Optically visible stars.
Karakas (2003)
18
5 Msun AGB models
Initial C abund Initial N abund
Domain where N up by 10, C down by 5. Early HBB
phase. Optically visible stars.
Karakas (2003)
19
NGC18664 AGB models (4 Msun)
Initial C abund Initial N abund
No hot-bottom burning! Need deeper convection
overshoot (Ventura et al. (2002)
Karakas (2003)
20
HV2576 AGB models (6 Msun)
Li abundance Smith et al (1995) -gt A(Li) 3.8
(HV2576) Higher than the models suggest.
Karakas (2003)
21
NGC18664 AGB models (4 Msun)
Initial C abund Initial N abund
Li abundance Maceroni et al (2002) -gt A(Li)
1.5 (NGC1866 4). Supports the need for deeper
convection or overshoot.
Karakas (2003)
22
SUMMARY
  • First determination of N production by HBB in
    massive AGB stars
  • Should take spectra at light phases 0.4 to 0.6
  • Standard AGB models underestimate the amount of
    hot-bottom burning overshoot at convective
    boundaries is required
  • Only two stars analysed needs confirmation
    (CRIRES)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com