Soils and their Classification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

Soils and their Classification

Description:

Soils differ from other engineering materials in that one has little control ... Used to determine the suitability of different soils ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: david554
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Soils and their Classification


1
Soils and their Classification

2
Soils - What are they?
  • Particulate materials
  • - Sedimentary origins (usually)
  • - Residual
  • Wide range of particle sizes
  • - larger particles quartz, feldspar
  • - very small particles clay minerals
  • Voids between particles

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
Need for Simple Classification
  • Usually soil on site has to be used.
  • Soils differ from other engineering materials in
    that one has little control over their properties
  • Extent and properties of the soil have to be
    determined
  • Cheap and simple tests are required to give an
    indication of engineering properties, e.g.
    stiffness, strength, for preliminary design
  • The classification must use core samples
    obtained from the ground. This information is
    often supplemented by in-situ tests such as cone
    penetration tests.

6
Classification based on Particle Size
  • Particle size is used because it is related to
    mineralogy
  • e.g. very small particles usually contain clay
    minerals
  • Broad Classification
  • Coarse grained soils
  • sands, gravels - visible to naked eye

7
Classification based on Particle Size
  • Particle size is used because it is related to
    mineralogy
  • e.g. very small particles usually contain clay
    minerals
  • Broad Classification
  • Coarse grained soils
  • sands, gravels - visible to naked eye
  • Fine grained soils
  • silts, clays, organic soils

8
Procedure for grain size determination
  • Sieving - used for particles gt 75 mm
  • Hydrometer test - used for smaller particles
  • Analysis based on Stokes Law, velocity
    proportional to diameter

9
Procedure for grain size determination
  • Sieving - used for particles gt 75 mm
  • Hydrometer test - used for smaller particles
  • Analysis based on Stokes Law, velocity
    proportional to diameter
  • Figure 1 Schematic diagram of hydrometer test

10
Procedure for grain size determination
  • Sieving - used for particles gt 75 mm
  • Hydrometer test - used for smaller particles
  • Analysis based on Stokes Law, velocity
    proportional to diameter
  • Figure 1 Schematic diagram of hydrometer test

11
Grading curves
W Well graded
12
Grading curves
W Well graded U Uniform
13
Grading curves
W Well graded U Uniform P Poorly graded
14
Grading curves
W Well graded U Uniform P Poorly graded C Well
graded with some clay
15
Grading curves
W Well graded U Uniform P Poorly graded C Well
graded with some clay F Well graded with an
excess of fines
16
Simple Classification
  • In general soils contain a wide range of particle
    sizes
  • Some means of describing the characteristics of
    soils with different proportions of
    sand/silt/clay is required.

17
Simple Classification
  • In general soils contain a wide range of particle
    sizes
  • Some means of describing the characteristics of
    soils with different proportions of
    sand/silt/clay is required.

18
Simple Classification
  • In general soils contain a wide range of particle
    sizes
  • Some means of describing the characteristics of
    soils with different proportions of
    sand/silt/clay is required.
  • Note the importance of clay - Finest 20 control
    behaviour

19
Example equal amounts sand/silt/clay
20
Example equal amounts sand/silt/clay
21
Example equal amounts sand/silt/clay
22
Atterberg Limits
  • Particle size is not that useful for fine grained
    soils

23
Atterberg Limits
  • Particle size is not that useful for fine grained
    soils
  • Figure 4 Moisture content versus volume relation
    during drying

SL
LL
PL
24
Atterberg Limits
  • Particle size is not that useful for fine grained
    soils
  • Figure 4 Moisture content versus volume relation
    during drying
  • SL - Shrinkage Limit
  • PL - Plastic Limit
  • LL - Liquid limit

SL
LL
PL
25
Atterberg Limits
  • SL - Shrinkage Limit
  • PL - Plastic Limit
  • LL - Liquid limit

26
Atterberg Limits
  • SL - Shrinkage Limit
  • PL - Plastic Limit
  • LL - Liquid limit
  • Plasticity Index LL - PL PI or Ip

27
Atterberg Limits
  • SL - Shrinkage Limit
  • PL - Plastic Limit
  • LL - Liquid limit
  • Plasticity Index LL - PL PI or Ip
  • Liquidity Index (m - PL)/Ip LI

28
Classification Systems
  • Used to determine the suitability of different
    soils
  • Used to develop correlations with useful soil
    properties
  • Special Purpose (Local) Systems
  • e.g. PRA system of AAHSO
  • 1. Well graded sand or gravel may include fines
  • 2. Sands and Gravels with excess fines
  • 3. Fine sands
  • 4. Low compressibility silts
  • 5. High compressibility silts
  • 6. Low to medium compressibility clays
  • 7. High compressibility clays
  • 8. Peat and organic soils

29
Unified Soil Classification
  • Each soil is given a 2 letter classification
    (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used.

30
Unified Soil Classification
  • Each soil is given a 2 letter classification
    (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used.
  • Coarse grained (gt50 larger than 75 mm)

31
Unified Soil Classification
  • Each soil is given a 2 letter classification
    (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used.
  • Coarse grained (gt50 larger than 75 mm)
  • Prefix S if gt 50 of coarse is Sand
  • Prefix G if gt 50 of coarse is Gravel

32
Unified Soil Classification
  • Each soil is given a 2 letter classification
    (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used.
  • Coarse grained (gt50 larger than 75 mm)
  • Prefix S if gt 50 of coarse is Sand
  • Prefix G if gt 50 of coarse is Gravel
  • Suffix depends on fines

33
Unified Soil Classification
  • Each soil is given a 2 letter classification
    (e.g. SW). The following procedure is used.
  • Coarse grained (gt50 larger than 75 mm)
  • Prefix S if gt 50 of coarse is Sand
  • Prefix G if gt 50 of coarse is Gravel
  • Suffix depends on fines
  • if fines lt 5 suffix is either W or P
  • if fines gt 12 suffix is either M or C
  • if 5 lt fines lt 12 Dual symbols are used

34
Unified Soil Classification
  • To determine if W or P, calculate Cu and Cc

x of the soil has particles smaller than Dx
35
Unified Soil Classification
  • To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc

x of the soil has particles smaller than Dx
36
Unified Soil Classification
  • To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc

x of the soil has particles smaller than Dx
37
Unified Soil Classification
  • To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc

x of the soil has particles smaller than Dx
D90 3 mm
38
Unified Soil Classification
  • To determine W or P, calculate Cu and Cc
  • If prefix is G then suffix is W if Cu gt 4 and
    Cc is between 1 and 3
  • otherwise use P
  • If prefix is S then suffix is W if Cu gt 6 and
    Cc is between 1 and 3
  • otherwise use P

39
Unified Soil Classification
  • Coarse grained soils
  • To determine M or C use plasticity chart
  • Below A-line use suffix M - Silt
  • Above A-line use suffix C - Clay

40
Unified Soil Classification
  • Fine grained soils (gt 50 finer than 75 mm)
  • Both letters determined from plasticity chart

41
(No Transcript)
42
Example
43
Example
  • fines ( finer than 75 mm) 11 - Dual
    symbols required

44
Example
  • fines ( finer than 75 mm) 11 - Dual
    symbols required
  • D10 0.06 mm, D30 0.25 mm, D60 0.75 mm

45
Example
Particle size fractions Gravel 17 Sand
73 Silt and Clay 10
46
Of the coarse fraction about 80 is sand, hence
Prefix is S Cu 12.5, Cc 1.38 Suffix1
W From Atterberg Tests LL 32, PL 26 Ip
32 - 26 6
47
Example
48
Of the coarse fraction about 80 is sand, hence
Prefix is S Cu 12.5, Cc 1.38 Suffix1
W From Atterberg Tests LL 32, PL 26 Ip
32 - 26 6 From Plasticity Chart point lies
below A-line Suffix2 M
49
Of the coarse fraction about 80 is sand, hence
Prefix is S Cu 12.5, Cc 1.38 Suffix1
W From Atterberg Tests LL 32, PL 26 Ip
32 - 26 6 From Plasticity Chart point lies
below A-line Suffix2 M Dual Symbols are
SW-SM
50
Of the coarse fraction about 80 is sand, hence
Prefix is S Cu 12.5, Cc 1.38 Suffix1
W From Atterberg Tests LL 32, PL 26 Ip
32 - 26 6 From Plasticity Chart point lies
below A-line Suffix2 M Dual Symbols are
SW-SM To complete the classification the Symbols
should be accompanied by a description
51
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com