Ag Policy, Lecture 16 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Ag Policy, Lecture 16

Description:

Both from Texas. Both probably had more interest in Texas agriculture than party politics ... about control and party politics than any specific legislation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: rachel60
Category:
Tags: lecture | policy

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ag Policy, Lecture 16


1
Ag Policy, Lecture 16
  • 2002 Farm Bill
  • Political Stage
  • Development
  • Provision
  • Issues today

2
Making the 2002 Farm Bill
  • Leading up to the 2002 Farm Bill
  • Budget surplus predicted for next 10 years
  • Farm prices were low with an outlook for slight
    increases
  • Ad hoc Disaster payments had been made each of
    past 4 years
  • Many believed Freedom to Farm wasnt working
    and we needed to strengthen the safety net

3
Making the 2002 Farm Bill
  • What is meant by safety net
  • Some said bring back the safety net
  • Some said strengthen the safety net
  • Who was more correct?

4
January 2001 Outlook for Grain Prices
5
A Major Rationale for Extra Funding for the 2002
Farm Bill Was to Eliminate Emergency Ad Hoc
Market-Loss Payments Enacted Due to Low Prices in
Prior Years
6
Estimated Costs of Commodity Group
ProposalsSubstantially Exceeded Additional Funds
Made Available for the 2002 Farm Bill
7
The Budget Reality Projected Federal budget
surpluses that facilitated extra funding for the
2002 farm bill disappeared by 2003

8
Making the 2002 Farm Bill
  • Players
  • House Mr. Combest Chair and Mr. Stenholm
    Ranking Minority Member of Ag Committee
  • Both 20 year veterans of the House and
    Agriculture
  • Both from Texas
  • Both probably had more interest in Texas
    agriculture than party politics
  • Senate Mr. Lugar Chair and Mr. Harkin Ranking
    Minority
  • Chairmanship switched in May 2001
  • Senate was probably more worried about control
    and party politics than any specific legislation

9
Making the 2002 Farm Bill
  • House started the process in late 2000
  • Called for Interest Group hearings under specific
    rules
  • Interest groups were scheduled month in advance
  • Corn, Soybean, Cotton, Rice, Wheat, Farm Bureau,
    National Farmers Union, etc.
  • Testimony could not be whining as usual
  • Testimony had to include the following
  • State a position,
  • Specify what they wanted,
  • Analyze the impacts on domestic and international
    markets,
  • Impacts on WTO ratings.
  • Interest Group Hearings started in February 01

10
Making the 2002 Farm Bill
  • House Ag Committee debates started early
  • May 01 -- House Ag Committee had narrowed
    options down to three alternative program options
  • June/July -- Analysis of three options
  • August 01 -- House Ag Committee sent a bill to
    the floor.
  • Sept 01 -- Passed by full House in September
    2001
  • Senate Ag committee had not started the process

11
Making the 2002 Farm Bill
  • Senate drafted a Harkin led bill around
    conservation plans and down played the
    traditional price and income supports
  • Feb 02 -- Senate finally gets a bill to the
    floor.
  • AFPC analyzed Senate bill in February and
    side-by-side comparison of the two bills in March

12
Making the 2002 Farm Bill
  • Senate bill had budget problems with conservation
    spending.
  • CBO made a 6 Billion error scoring the Senate
    bill
  • Put Senate at a disadvantage in Conference
    Committee
  • Senate conceded on conservation spending goals
  • April 02 -- Conference committee compromise bill
    mostly resembled the House version.
  • May 02 President Bush signed the bill

13
2002 Farm Bill Provisions
  • Continue Marketing Loan
  • Continue AMTA, Now called Direct Payments
  • Still no production controls
  • New Target Price called Counter-Cyclical Payment
    (CCP)
  • Allowed for an update of Base acres and Farm
    Program Yields
  • Conservation Security Program

14
2002 Farm Bill Provisions
  • Allowed for an update of Base acres
  • One time update in 2002
  • Based on 1998-2001 average acres planted
  • One decision for your entire farm
  • Allowed for an update of Farm Program Yields
  • Only if you updated Base Acres
  • Decision applied to all your crops
  • Only applied to CCP, Direct payments still made
    based on 1985 yields
  • Seven Possible Update Options

15
2002 Farm Bill Provisions
  • New Target Price called Counter-Cyclical Payment
    (CCP)
  • CCP rate TP - Direct Pay rate max(price,LR)
  • CCP CCP Rate Base acre CCP yield 0.85

16
2002 Farm Bill Provisions
  • Where would you rather get your price subsidy?
  • CCP or Loan Gain?
  • The answer is not as simple as what can be shown
    in this picture.
  • Remember Loan gains are coupled to production
  • And CCP is decoupled from production


S
TP
Deficiency Payments
LR
Loan Gains or Benefits
MP
D
Q/yr
QS QD
17
2002 Farm Bill Provisions
  • Most of the feed grains lobbied for higher loan
    rates
  • Cotton lobbied to stay at 0.52 loan rate
  • Factors
  • Specifics of the payments
  • Production risk
  • Technology advancements


S
TP
Deficiency Payments
LR
Loan Gains or Benefits
MP
D
Q/yr
QS QD
18
2002 Farm Bill Provisions
  • Conservation Security Program
  • Authorized in 2002 Farm Bill
  • Has struggled with implementation and funding
    ever since
  • May be implemented this summer
  • Concept was to pay for Conservation and/or
    Improving Quality of soil, water, air, energy,
    plant animal life

19
2002 Farm Bill Provisions
  • Coupled or Decoupled programs?

20
What has Happened Since Farm Bill Signed May 2002?
  • Federal budget deficit took away the surplus
  • Budget problems pressure Congress to amend the
    bill

21
Congressional Budgets
  • Entitlement (Mandatory) Programs
  • Most farm program provisions
  • Under jurisdiction of the Ag Committees
  • Budgets are estimated cost of providing benefits
    to participating, eligible recipients
  • Multi-year funding provided in budget when law is
    passed
  • Annual appropriations are not necessary
  • Appropriated Programs
  • Under jurisdiction of the appropriations
    committee
  • Funded annually

22
Congressional Budget Office
  • The CBO Baseline
  • 10-year projected federal budget
  • Assumes current laws and policies continue
    throughout
  • Incorporates current and projected market
    conditions, economic trends, and USDA
    implementation decisions
  • CBO scores (cost estimate) proposed legislation
    by comparing
  • Projected federal costs if proposal becomes law
    and
  • Projected federal costs in baseline
  • Bills are often re-worked to achieve a desired
    score

23
Congressional Budgets
  • Budget Resolution
  • Congress annual multi-year budget plan
  • CBO Baseline plus any changes authorized in the
    resolution
  • Budget Reconciliation
  • Instructions given to authorizing committees on
    their share of spending cuts to achieve an
    overall federal budget reduction
  • Savings must be relative to the current baseline

24
Lecture 16, Wrap up
  • Can you answer these?
  • What is a safety net?
  • Can you calculate a CCP rate, given all the
    information (target price, market price, loan
    rate, direct payment rate)?
  • In developing the 2002 farm bill which won out,
    bipartisanship or party politics? What happened?
  • Can you rank the 2002 farm bill provisions in
    terms of how coupled/decoupled? What
    characteristics make a program coupled or
    decoupled?
  • What is the difference between an entitlement
    program and an appropriated program?
  • What is the CBO Baseline? What does it mean for
    CBO to score a bill?
  • What is the difference in budget resolution and
    budget reconciliation?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com