Title: PowerPointPrsentation
1Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
2Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Cruise track of R/V Meteor cruise 36-1 from
Hamilton, Bermuda to Las Palmas, Gran Canaria,
Spain.
3Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Temperature and salinity range encountered during
the course of the experiment.
4Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Schematic diagram of the underway pumping system
for use in the moon pool of research vessels as
used during the intercomparison exercise. All
underway systems were connected to this system.
5Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Laboratory setup of the intercomparison exercise
during Meteor cruise 36-1
6Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
7Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
WHOI
IFM
MRI
UEA
CSIRO
OU
8Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Test of CO2 calibration performance Shown are
the observed deviations from the concentrations
of all measured NOAA/CMDL CO2 standards. Pink
crosses indicate the concentrations of the
standards used in the exercise. The legend gives
details of the nominal concentrations used for
calibration. Also shown is the range of measured
xCO2 during the whole intercomparison.
9Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Test of equilibrator temperature probes Shown
are the deviations of the measured temperatures
from the reference temperature. Equilibrator
probe and reference probe were kept together in
the same water bath until readings became stable.
Also shown are the linear correction lines which
were applied to temperature readings of that
particular system.
10Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Comparison of measured CO2 mole fraction in dry
air (xCO2air) The black horizontal lines
represent the overall mean xCO2air value ( 1
s.d.) calculated from systems BE.
11Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Mean values of the CO2 mole fraction in dry air
(xCO2air) as measured by laboratories AE and
G during the period of the intercomparison
exercise where data from all six systems are
available (June 7, 2230 UTC to June 13, 1230
UTC). Also shown is the standard deviation of all
xCO2air data sets from their mean. The horizontal
line represents the mean xCO2air value calculated
from the means of profiles BE for this
limited period of time.
12Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Table 3. Daily mean ( standard deviation) of
deviations from the 11-min running mean of D
and E (reference). Deviations exceeding 2
µatm are marked in bold. Smaller deviations are
not significant under the technical circumstances
of this exercise. The results for D and E are
shown in italics to indicate that this data have
been used to calculate the reference.
13Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Typical picture from second half of the cruise
where little variability in SST and SSS prevailed.
14Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
Typical picture from second half of the cruise
where little variability in SST and SSS prevailed.
15Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
16Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
- Summary
- Equilibrator design with regard to the
achievable accuracy no best choice can be
identified. Different design, however, has
consequences for the equilibration time constant.
Also, higher water flow rates generally lead to a
smaller warming effect. -
- Wet air NDIR measurements (using the LI-COR
6252) may be characterized by some loss in
accuracy although this does not seem to be a
major problem. - The factory-calibration of the LI-COR
instruments (zero and span adjustment of the
factory-polynomial) does not achieve the
necessary accuracy. -
- Thermostatting the sample air flow prior to the
NDIR measurement is recommended. - Temperature measurements are not always done
with the necessary care and appear to introduce
large errors (up to 7 µatm during this exercise). - Seawater pCO2 measurements can be made to a high
degree of agreement ( 1 µatm). However, even
apparently well-functioning system can disagree
by several µatm
17Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan
18Workshop on Ocean Surface pCO2, Data Integration
and Database Development, Jan 14-17, 2004, NIES,
Tsukuba/Japan