Societal Psychology Year 1, Term 2 Social Constructions of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Societal Psychology Year 1, Term 2 Social Constructions of

Description:

WE will be doing the class. Mobile, text, chat, etc,etc are not allowed. 9/1/09. 3 ... A problem for the 'rest of us' ( Rosenblum & Travis, 2000) ... London. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: mrsjo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Societal Psychology Year 1, Term 2 Social Constructions of


1
Societal PsychologyYear 1, Term 2Social
Constructions of
  • Disability

2
Disability
  • Alberto Corizzo
  • 14 January 2008, 1000-1200hs
  • Break, 15 minutes approx. at 1100.
  • Interactive class. WE will be doing the class.
  • Mobile, text, chat, etc,etc are not allowed

3
By the end of the presentations you will be able
to gain a better understanding of
  • The Social Construction of Social Problems
  • Definitions of disability
  • Religious and moral constructions of disabled
    people.
  • Developments in Charities of the concept of
    disabilities.
  • Disability as a social process
  • Medical model of disability
  • Eugenics model
  • Psychological approaches to disability
  • The social model of disability

4
  • What it is that makes social problems social?
  • Why does some issues deserves public attention
  • and not others?
  • Why some of them appeared and disappeared?

.. " what is social about a social problem is
that such problem have gained a hold on the
attention of a particular society at a
particular time".. Clarke Cochrane ( 1998).
The social construction of social problems,
Chapter 1, p.4. In Embodying the social
5
Homeless in 19th century was not 'perceived' as a
social problem but rather as a 'fact of life',
individual misfortune
  • Scale of a particular or private problem may
    transform it into a public
  • or social issue.
  • Social Context in which it occurs ( Whose
    problem is this?)
  • Some people "have" problems. Some people "are"
    problems
  • Are they a threat or danger for the society?
  • (E.g. Vandals, prostitutes, mentally ill, noisy
    neighbours
  • Homeless may be both ?

6
  • Some people "have" problems. Some people "are"
    problems

Social Justice (If it is 'our' problem).
Economic/Political reasons/ Social
Social Order (If it is 'their' problem) ( Drugs,
Benefits, Mental illness, etc)
7
Social Problems and Social Policies
  • Perception that 'something' must be done. Some
    intervention is required
  • I.e. Poverty, Drugs misusers, Prostitution,
    Disability, Race, Gender, etc,etc

Poverty is 'natural'/ inevitable. It is
life.. Poverty is the result of 'poor people' (
Lack of skills,etc) Poverty is the result of
economic and/or political causes
View of poverty
8
Social Constructionism "The mean by which
humans could create order out of the
potential chaos of life" ( Berger
Luckmann, 1967)
  • Order established ( By whom?)- Ideology (set
    of ideas)

E.g Unemployment may helps to control the
labour market
  • People afraid to lost their job
  • Cheap labour cost
  • More market competition.
  • Unemployed 'fighting' for a job.
  • E.g. more qualification, more 'flexibility'

9
Social Constructionism
  • Emphasises the role of language as an essential
    feature of human societies
  • Actions are preceded by understanding and
    intentions
  • We intend our actions to have meaningful outcomes
  • Our actions convey messages to other people in
    society
  • Labelling
  • How we label things affects how we behave
    towards those things
  • The name, or label, carries with it expectations

10
Is it a matter of label or the word
used? "Naming is a key process in the creation
of categories of people" (Gordon Rosemblum,
2001) "Power to establish and define policies"
Puerto RicansMexican- AmericanSpanish
AmericanHispanic.Latino Colour
.Negro..BlackAfro-American..African-
American HomosexualGays.queer Idiots,
Mongols, retarded, mentally deficient, subnormal,
mentally handicapped 'cap in hand', special
needs, learning difficulties, learning
disabilities, ..disabled people.people with
disabilitiesperson affected by.
It may develop hostility and devaluationinstituti
onalisation, dehumanisation
segregation..isolation
11
Shhhhh, don't talk. It is a taboo
  • A taboo is a thing, person or act that is subject
    to social or sacred prohibition (Mechanism of
    control by the establishment ?)
  • Please, DON'T TALK ABOUT.Religion, sex, gays,
    lesbians.'disability'.
  • It could makes the word safe by establishing
  • clear boundaries between 'normal-abnormal',
  • 'safe-dangerous', 'pure-dirty', divine- mundane
  • (Douglas,1966).

12
Defining disability
  • Disability denotes the relationship between
    impairment, disability and handicap
  • - Impairment is the loss or abnormality of
    psychological, physiological or anatomical
    structures or function
  • disability is the resulting restriction or lack
    of ability or function to perform an activity in
    a manner within the range considered 'normal' for
    a human being
  • - handicap is the disadvantage for a given
    individual, arising out of impairment and
    disability, that limits or prevents the
    fulfilment of daily activities or role considered
    normal (depending on age, sex and social and
    cultural factors) for that individual

13
More Definitions
  • (1) The condition of being unable to perform a
    task or function because of a physical or mental
    impairment (2) something that disables
    handicap (3) lack of necessary intellect,
    strength etc.
  • (Collins Concise English Dictionary, 1986)
  • Disability is a category which is central to how
    welfare states regulate an increasing population
    of their citizens. In this sense and context, it
    is a political and social construction used to
    regulate.
  • (Fulcher, a political scientist, 1989, p.21)

14
Defining disability
  • There are competing positions as to how
    disability is best defined
  • Definitions carry very different emphases and
    assumptions
  • Some stress the unable or impaired individual
  • Some point to institutions which disable people

15
Measuring Disability
16 years
10 years old
16
Religious and Moral Constructions of Disabled
People
  • Disability has been religiously explained as
    divine punishment for sin/unnatural acts (Thomas
    (1971, p. 125)
  • Along side deviancy, unnatural, and dangerous is
    a moral call to do good work and show pity to
    the less fortunate (Personal tragedy theory)
  • One highly visible manifestation of this good
    work are charities

17
The Rise of the Medical Model
  • The process of medicalisation of mental illness
    was was born out of a power struggle between
    contesting experts the management of the mad
  • Moral Management non-scientific
  • Medical professional were the only people who had
    the abilities required to safely work with those
    with mental health problems exclusive
    professional knowledge. The 'WISE' people
    know'''
  • "Knowledge (The way of knowing about something)
    and Power (the way of acting on something").
    Experts doing diagnosis .( Saraga, 1998. p.69)

18
The Medical model
  • Views disability as pathology or illness
    Individual, medical, or personal tragedy (Barnes,
    1990, Shakespeare Watson, 1997)
  • The way for society to respond to a person with a
    disability is to cure them to give them treatment
    which which will lessen or remove their
    disability normalise
  • The solution to the problem is only when medicine
    decides it is cured . Promoted institutionalisatio
    n which was used as a form of social control


19
Medical model
The Medical Model is the traditional definition
accepted in society where disability is view
as 'personal or biological tragedy' an
accidenta failure, a defected human being.
something was wrong
20
Developments in charities and disability care
  • Tied to the medical model
  • In 1990 there were 170,000 charities in the UK,
    the top 200 charities had a combined income of
    1billion 50 of these were health charities.
  • Advertisements from charities initially presented
    the most oppressive/negative imagery (Hervey,
    1992)
  • More recent advertising by charities has tended
    to be more sensitive to potential stereotyping
    and negative images

21
Psychological Approaches
  • Stresses the importance of psychological factors
    grouped around the notion of intelligence (IQ
    test)
  • Growth industry of testing people.
  • 1950s - segregative hospitalisation, drug
    therapy, and intrusive measures
  • Current move towards a more humane
    understanding of the difficulties of people with
    disabilities - community care

22
Denied attributes valued in the society
'Disabled' are not expected to be dominant,
active, independent, adventurous competitive,
sexual, self controlled, healthy. Intelligent,
attractive, competent Therefore, it is a risk
to be seen as 'nothing but a problem' A problem
for the 'rest of us' ( Rosenblum Travis, 2000)
What about the right to die movement.eugenicbio-
genetic?
23
Eugenics
  • Improving the quality of human race .
  • The science of improving the quality of the human
    race, especially by selective breeding to produce
    a strong race and thereby avoid contamination
    by immigration
  • Certain groups having certain unchangeable
    defects
  • Defective people threaten moral values and social
    order produce more defective people -
    dangerous lesser species
  • Used supposedly natural characteristics to
    justify the oppression of certain groups

24
DEHUMANISATION !!!!!
  • Genocide or mass killing
  • Racial, ethnic, religious or political group.
  • One of the more infamous genocide during Nazi
    German.
  • First step were 100,000 disabled Germans
    viewed as a 'burden' for the society.
  • Ref Staub, E. 1990, in Societal Psychology

25
"links between the medical and 'scientific'
classification of 'defective' categories of
human (minds and bodies) and the wider processes
of social control of " PROBLEM POPULATION" (
Saraga, 1998. P.72)
Disability
Benefits Sheltered Housing GPs Charities Spec
ial schools
Hospitals Therapists Social Workers Transportat
ion
Person
OTs
Medication
Adapted from Hughes, G (1998). Fig 2.1 "The
medical model of disability" p76
26
Criticisms of the Medical model
  • The invisibility of the person in the medical
    gaze Dehumanisation
  • Medical facts and diagnosis determine not only
    treatment but also the form of life for the
    disabled person
  • Rehabilitation and the quest for normality
  • Subordination of the deviant disabled

27
The Consequences
  • People become known by their disability label
    the impairment becomes the focus for the person
  • People are segregated from the rest of
    'non-disabled' society
  • Childhood can be extended and independence never
    achieved

28
Social Prejudice
  • Common stereotypes about people with disability
  • Homogenous " DISABLED"
  • Pity
  • Evil
  • Super-cripple/Brave
  • Innocence/Asexuality
  • Dependent

29
The Disability Movement
  • Aims to transform the political agenda for
    disabled people - Charity to rights
  • Oppressed citizens rather than dependent and
    needy individuals (e.g. equal opportunities in
    employment, welfare rights and housing)
  • Sought to question disability dependence
  • Independence for people with disabilities,
    Attempting to reclaim disability and celebrate
    difference
  • If disability is viewed as a socially constructed
    its meaning may be changed through social and
    political action

30
In a few words
  • "disability is a societal process rather
  • than physical or cognitive problem"
  • "It is a complex and sophisticated form of
  • Social oppression or institutional
    discrimination"
  • Oliver, 1990

31
The Social Model
  • Disability as Social oppression
  • Believe that rather than biology disabling
    people
  • it is society that disables physically disabled
    people. Disability is something imposed on top
    of our impairments by the way we are
    unnecessarily isolated and excluded from full
    participation in society (Oliver, 1996, p. 33)
  • Thus the differences due to disability dont
    matter and disability does not arise in
    individuals but in the barriers society erects
    (e.g. building and transport access) -
    disablement
  • We are all dependent upon aids (e.g. phone,
    transport, tools, glasses, medication etc.) so
    why are some aids (e.g. mobility aids)
    stigmatising for people
  • The equivalent cure in this model is for
    society to change, not the individual
  • This change would have to be through both
    physical environmental change and through
    adaptation of views society holds about
    disability

32
The social model of disability
Lack of employment Charities with
offensive Images of disability Lack of
access Prejudices Over-protective Families
Lack of financial independence Attitudes Languag
e labelling Isolation, segregation Fear,
ignorance. Lack of proper legislation
Disability
PERSON
Adapted houses 'ghettoism'
Adapted from Hughes, G (1998). Fig. 2.2 . The
social model of disability disablings forces at
work. p78
33
Segregation to Community
  • National Health Community Care Act 1990
  • Different contested constructions of disability
    underpinned the 1990s debates
  • Deinstitutionalisation due to conditions and
    treatment of people in institutions
  • Care organised around ordinary life principles
    (Nirje, Wolfensberger)
  • and quality of Life - experiences of of people
    with learning disabilities taken into account to
    a greater degree
  • Demonstrates the varied and contested
    constructions of care for people with
    disabilities

34
Criticisms of the social model
  • Bury (1996) - ignores the relationship of chronic
    illness to disability in older people
  • Focuses on a small minority of younger disabled
    people who have non-chronic relatively stable
    though perhaps severe forms of disability
  • Demonstrates the importance of acknowledging that
    the disabled population is segmented and should
    not be treated as one homogenous group of people

35
Counter Arguments
  • Oliver (1990) - ALL disabled people experience
    disability as social restriction
  • Barnes (1996) Research has been part of the
    oppression - the myth of the independent
    researcher
  • Criticisms of the social constructionist approach
    also come from members of the disability movement
    and other researchers (e.g. Shakespeare)
  • Morris (1991)- dominated by men
  • Although they acknowledge the importance of
    focusing away from the medical and towards the
    social construction of disability, they feel that
    the lived experience of impairment has been
    ignored.
  • Chappell (1998) - Accounts ignore the experiences
    of people with learning disabilities
  • Social model theorists are wary of taking this
    approach

36
Bringing the models together
  • The debate between these two models influences
    the speed at which society changes the process
    of giving power to the disabled
  • The debate affects public policy and peoples
    lives
  • The medical model employs this heuristic, whilst
    the social model believes we should forget
    categories and diagnoses and look at the
    individual

37
Disabled people's attitude toward other
impairments groups a hierarchy of
impairmentsMark Deal (2003). Disability and
Society, Vol.18, pp 897-910
  • "Disabled people, like non disabled people, do
    not always wish to be associated with other
    impairment groups".
  • Discriminated-discriminators?

38
Material adapted from Dr. Darren Chadwick (MMU)
Available on Web CT
  • Main Bibliography
  • Hughes, Gordon ( 2005). A suitable case for
    treatment? Construction of
  • Disability, Chapter 2, pp 42-89). Cited in
    Embodying the social Construction of
    difference. Ed. Esther Saga, Routledge,2005.
    London.
  • Coles, J.(2001).The social model of disability
    what does it mean for practice in services for
    people with learning difficulties?. Disability
    and Society, Vol.16,4, pp 501-510.
  • Gordon, B and Rosenblum, K.(2001). Bringing
    disability into the sociological frame a
    comparison of disability with race, sex, and
    sexual orientation statuses. Disability and
    Society, Vol 16, 4, pp 5-19.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com