Hot Topics in Safety in the EU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Hot Topics in Safety in the EU

Description:

Literature articles reporting ADRs in a group of patients such as PE studies ... Safety specifications generally complete important risks are sometimes lacking ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: bad86
Category:
Tags: hot | safety | topics

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hot Topics in Safety in the EU


1
Hot Topics in Safety in the EU
  • Dr Brian Edwards
  • Scientific Adviser
  • Pharmacovigilance Drug Safety
  • NDA Regulatory Science Ltd
  • BADSA meeting,
  • Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.
  • 5000 Shoreline Court, Suite 200,
  • South San Francisco
  • August 13th 2009

2
Presentation overview
  • Advanced therapies
  • EudraVigilance
  • Risk management plan
  • The QPPV role
  • Inspections
  • Human Factor the secret to Safety

3
Advanced therapies
  • First advanced therapy authorised by CHMP June
    2009..Chondrocelect
  • Traceability MAH responsible for product
    hospital responsible for tracing patients aided
    by MAH
  • Efficacy follow-up system (analogous to
    paediatric guideline)
  • Procedural AEs are recordable and reportable
  • Communication right product, right patient,
    right site
  • System still under development by EMEA how CAT
    and CHMP will interact
  • Guideline on safety efficacy follow up
    Risk management of advanced therapy medicinal
    products EMEA/149995/2008

4
New version QA from EV-EWG
  • New set of QA expected soon to address
    frequently answered questions consensus between
    EV-EWG and PhVWG
  • Literature articles reporting ADRs in a group of
    patients such as PE studies
  • Only one ICSR per article with a summary with
    information in ICHE2B(R2) B.5.1 )as described in
    Chapter I.4 and still discuss in PSUR

5
EudraVigilance ICH E2B
  • ICH E2B working group have revised the current
    E2B(R2) specifications
  • - around Drug Section
  • - identification of Medicinal Products (IDMP/M5)
  • - seriousness at event level only (not case)
  • - better provision for Studies repeatable
    section for study numbers
  • ICH M2 transferred messaging standard
    responsibility to ISO who have formed WG 6 (ISO
    TC215) linked to HL7 CEN CDISC and
    vocabularies such as SNOWMED
  • HL7 required for interoperability with healthcare
    systems to allow ADR reporting
  • ICHE2B and M2 working groups working on
    Implementation guide (can produce messages
    regardless of whether understand HL7 or not)
    reference message instance sample messages
    backwards/forwards conversion between e2B(R2) and
    ISO ICSR (E2B(R3)
  • ICH testing will be completed in August and
    report to national standards body and ISO
  • Implementation guide Step 3 ideally end Oct 2009
    ..maybe up to May 2010

6
EudraVigilance Data Elements and standards for
Drug Dictionaries
  • ICH M5 guideline switched to ISO standards from
    February 2007
  • prEN ISO 11615 11616 11238 11239 11240 with
    different project leads and editors
  • Drafts released May 12th 2009
  • Joint initiative with HL7 CDISC IHTSDO CEN
    health informatics to exchange regulated
    medicinal product information
  • Conceptual testing by all ICH regions and Health
    Canada with comments by Aug 12 2009
  • Gap analysis of HL7 Common Product Model

7
EudraVigilance Data Elements and standards for
Drug Dictionaries- best case scenario
  • ISO Identification of MP Draft International
    Standard (DIS) sometime between Nov 2009 and May
    20101 depending on extent of ISO ballot comments
  • ICH Step 2 for testing will be initiated in
    October 2009 with testing implementation guide
    out for consultation November 2009
  • Joint implementation with ICSR E2B(3) standard in
    the EU
  • New EU PV legislation will require MAH to provide
    these data

8
Duplicate detection good practice
  • EV Duplicate detection algorithm based on patient
    details AND similarity in ADR data AND similarity
    in drug data
  • Look for similarities for potential groupings
  • Look for differences in MedDRA coding
  • If no match broaden search
  • Manual confirmation important with checking of
    narrative
  • Merging cases either by creating one Master case
    or single new case linked to the duplicates

9
Duplicate detection good practice
  • MAH should manage duplicate reports in their own
    system
  • IF MAH aware a duplicate report has been
    submitted then should be placed in A.1.11.12 or
    add in senders comments (B.5.4)
  • For co-marketing agreements follow chapter 1,1
    section 3 of Volume 9A
  • Care in worldwide ref. no. and duplicate no.
    fields
  • Parallel reporting should now stop
  • Literature main source of duplicates

10
Duplicate detection good practice
  • EV duplicate detection and a management tool
    currently planned to be deployed for October 2009
  • EudraVigilance Data Quality Management tender
    under finalisation looking for a vendor
  • I would expect further guidance about regulatory
    expectations in future version Volume 9A

11
(No Transcript)
12
Regulatory feedback on RMPs Key assessment
issues
  • Too much emphasis on routine PV not product
    specific measures
  • Too much emphasis on what is already known rather
    than identifying areas
  • which are lacking
  • Lack of read across between the key risks and
    the PV plan
  • Information poorly presented with long and
    complicated tables

13
Regulatory feedback on RMPs Key assessment
issues
  • Relevance of the epidemiology of the disease to
    the target indication is not sufficiently
    considered
  • Discrepancies between DDPS and the
    pharmacovigilance plan

14
Regulatory feedback on RMPs
  • Some measures cannot be uniform across all member
    states
  • Need flexibility to ensure that adequate risk
    minimization is possible in all MS where the
    product is marketed

15
Assessment conclusions following EMEA
commissioned assessment of RMPs
  • Risk management plans have become routine
    practice
  • Safety specifications generally complete
    important risks are sometimes lacking
  • Overreliance on routine pharmacovigilance
  • Limited availability of study protocols
    precludes proper scientific assessment sometimes
    difficult to assess whether study will answer
    question
  • Studies in non-EU population might lead to
    differences in patient characteristics and health
    care systems compared to the EU
  • Registries seem to be a valuable tool to obtain
    safety data of biological products
  • Need for individualised PASS depending on the
    type of product
  • Assessment by
    Bert Leufkens et al.
  • University of
    Utrecht, Faculty of Science,
    Pharmaceutical Sciences

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
  • Pharmacovigilance Inspection Metrics Report
  • July 2008 to December 2008

20
  • Pharmacovigilance Inspection Metrics Report
  • July 2008 to December 2008

Miscellaneous Reg. affairs, QA, med.info.
Clinical)
21
  • Pharmacovigilance Inspection Metrics Report
  • July 2008 to December 2008

22
Where are we going with the QPPV?
  • Organisation for the QPPV officially launched
    April 2009 if you are a DIA member and a QPPV or
    a deputy you are eligible
  • Working group to establish the organisation
  • Working group to look at training education

23
By this stage how do you feel?
24
Next some local news..
25
Human Factor Elements
Academic Researchers Regulatory
Authorities Industry
Human - Machine. Switches Info
presentation Instrument Layout.
MA
S
E
HU
Humans - Environment Organisational
hierarchy Organisational climate Working
Environment.
Humans - Software Procedures Digital
printouts Regulations
HU
Humans - Humans. Team performance Prof.culture. Tr
aining.
26
How to set up a process?
Decisionmaking. Leadership Cooperation. Situation
awareness.
Human Function.
Fluid.
PROCESS
Solid.
Regulations. SOPs Quality systems Rules. Methods.
System Function.
27
Why Do Errors OccurSome Obstacles
  • Workload fluctuations
  • Interruptions
  • Fatigue
  • Multi-tasking
  • Failure to follow up
  • Poor handoffs
  • Ineffective communication
  • Not following protocol
  • Excessive professional courtesy
  • Halo effect
  • Passenger syndrome
  • Hidden agenda
  • Complacency
  • High-risk phase
  • Strength of an idea
  • Task fixation

Source TeamSTEPPS at
http//www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/index.htm
28
Secret of High Reliability Safety
  • 1. Preoccupied with Failure Focused on ways
    systems can fail and courageous about acting on
    their concerns.
  • 2. Resistant to Oversimplification Inclined to
    question conventional or convenient
    interpretations for failures.
  • 3. Sensitive to Operations Constantly
    integrating broad-ranging
  • information and the actions of others into a big
    picture.
  • 4. Committed to Resilience and Self-Examination
    Mindful of past errors and planning ahead to
    prevent future errors.
  • 5. Deferential to the Best Expertise Responsive
    to the knowledge of those closest to the action,
    regardless of their rank or organizational power.
  • Adapted from Henriksen, K., E. Dayton, M. Keyes,
    P. Carayon, and R. G. Hughes. 2007.
  • Understanding adverse events A human factors
    framework. In Patient safety and quality An
    evidence-based handbook for nurses (prepared with
    support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation),
    ed. R. G. Hughes, 167-85, 08-0043. Rockville,
    MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
    For the original five tenets, see Weick, K., and
    K. Sutcliffe. 2001.
  • Managing the unexpected Assuring high
    performance in an age of complexity. San
    Francisco Jossey-Bass.

29
Team working to improve System Effectiveness
Safety
PLEASE LOOK AT http//teamstepps.ahrq.gov/
DECISION MAKING SITUATIONAL AWARENESS LEADERSHI
P COMMUNICATION ERROR MANAGEMENT PERSONALITY
AND BEHAVIOUR
30
For the pharmaceutical sector what does it all
mean?
31
How has International Society of
Pharmacovigilance responded?
  • 1. Application of Human Factor in core processes
    such spontaneous reporting process and the PSUR
  • 2. Application of the Human Factor in Clinical
    trial safety starting with training of sites and
    investigators
  • 3. Application of the Human Factor in training
    especially developing games and workshops to show
    how applying teamwork can improve compliance and
    efficiency.
  • 4. Develop and appropriate checklist to help
    ensure safe use of the product.
  • 5. Develop PV competency based curriculum in the
    U.S. aligned with objectives of TeamSTEPPS
  • 5. Safety climate survey first version is on it
    way
  • 6. Application in PV quality management and
    inspections
  • 7. Application of HF in risk communication (New
    Erice Statement due)
  • 8. Develop The Safety Case for safe outsourcing
  • 9. Input of all of the above into the QPPV
    curriculum
  • 10. These topics to features in theses in MSc
    pharmacovigilance courses

32
Hot Topics In Summary
  • Advanced therapies are truly all about thinking
    out of the box
  • Changes in EudraVigilance expected more complex
    with resource implications and national awareness
    still required
  • Expectations about duplicate process
  • Do not underestimate the amount of effort to
    produce a RMP keep to the template
  • Inspections are routine plenty of evidence now
    available about what to expect
  • The QPPV role will become more prominent
  • Do not forget Safety is the end game and prime
    purpose of why we are here need to apply the
    evidence of what make a Safe System
  • Urgent need to align the pharma sector with
    system changes in healthcare modernisation
  • Do not forget the fundamental priorities of
    signal detection and managing risk

33
Questions?
Please contact brian.edwards_at_ndareg.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com