Argument - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Argument

Description:

Argument. Premises. Conclusion. Conclusion Indicators. Thus. Therefore. Hence. This shows that ... Will I be able to stop the car in time? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:147
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: jalten6
Category:
Tags: argument

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Argument


1
Argument
  • Premises
  • Conclusion

2
Conclusion Indicators
  • Thus
  • Therefore
  • Hence
  • This shows that
  • This suggests that
  • Consequently
  • So
  • Accordingly
  • This implies that
  • This proves that

3
Premise Indicators
  • Since
  • Because
  • For
  • In view of
  • This is implied by

4
Arguments
  • Good Justifies acceptance of the conclusion
  • Valid If the premises are true, the conclusion
    must be true
  • Sound All premises are true
  • Strong Unlikely that if the premises are true
    the conclusion is false

5
Arguments,
  • Deductive An argument that is either valid or
    intended by its author to be so.
  • Inductive An invalid argument whose premises are
    intended to provide some support, but less than
    conclusive support, for the conclusion.

6
Deductive Reasoning
  • Generally described as moving from general
    principles to particular phenomena.
  • In a simple-minded example, knowing the existence
    of gravity makes one able to predict the likely
    direction of movement of any unsupported object
    in a gravitational field.
  • In a practical (but related) example, having
    observed the direction of movement of a number of
    unsupported objects on the surface of the Earth
    makes it easy to predict the movement of any
    other unsupported objects under similar
    conditions (things fall down--a thing will fall
    down when dropped).
  • Knowing that public buildings contain, among
    other things, drinking fountains and telephone
    booths (general principles) one may confidently
    expect to satisfy the need for such amenities
    based on the likely prediction of finding either
    in a given building (a particular phenomenon).

7
Examples of Deductive Reasoning
  • Deductive reasoning (or deduction) is the way in
    which the human adult survives.
  • We do not walk into a public street without
    looking for cars any more than one of our
    prehistoric ancestors would walk into the den of
    a cave bear without checking for occupancy.
  • We match our immediate experience with our armory
    of general principles about the way the world
    works and satisfy ourselves that we are in no
    danger.
  • We also use this technique to find the resources
    needed to keep us alive. Having general ideas
    about where food is found (whether in a tree or
    in a market) enables the prediction of its
    specific locations thereby helping to ensure
    survival.

8
Inductive Reasoning
  • Generally described as moving from particulars to
    general principles.
  • How many times do we find food under a certain
    kind of rock or in a certain type of tree before
    we begin to realize that food ought to be sought
    there?
  • The generalizations that food can be found under
    white rocks or in slender trees with peeling bark
    are derived by inductive reasoning.
  • Induction is the natural work of a small child
    ("You can't teach an old dog new tricks.").
  • An important function of a complex environment is
    to provide the child with experiences needed to
    induce the generalizations required for a
    successful life.
  • Knowledgeable parents gauge toys and experiences
    to the developmental level and temperament of the
    child. It is the constant knowledge and fear that
    induction is yet imperfect that leads parents to
    restrict the explorations of young children to
    "safe" activities ("Be home before midnight!")
  • Bad judgment can lead to survival failure.

9
More Inductive Reasoning
  • Deduction, then, is the reward of induction.
  • As we mature, we gain the ability to filter our
    perceptions and experiences through a complex web
    of conventional, induced notions about the causes
    and consequences of a vast array of daily
    phenomena.
  • We use the predictions made by deductive
    reasoning for countless small decisions in the
    conduct of our lives.
  • "Is it safe to cross the street?" "Is that noise
    in the basement the cat or an intruder?" "How
    will my boss respond to my request for a leave
    day?" "Will this log across the stream support my
    weight?" "Will I be able to stop the car in
    time?"
  • All such questions are best answered by deduction
    based on existing, induced principles. In other
    words, by using good judgment.
  • In a "natural" human habitat induction is
    practiced mainly by children. It is the rare
    adult who discovers something truly new (they are
    content with what they learnt).
  • The ability that children have to look at
    ordinary things in fresh ways leads us to remark
    about the "innocence of children" and the "joy of
    simple discovery" characteristic of the way a
    child looks at the (mundane, dirty old) world.
  • Unfortunately, this inquisitive inductive phase
    of human development is usually cut short by
    imposed educational philosophies which, by
    turning the favored generalizations of
    high-ranking educators into dogma, stifle
    creative exploration.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com