Vulnerability to drought in Mozambique - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Vulnerability to drought in Mozambique

Description:

Train or car to Chokwe. Crops, land and agricultural implements lost during 2000 floods ... Sale of goats and cattle. Horticultural crops (beans, cabbage) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: sire1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vulnerability to drought in Mozambique


1
Vulnerability to drought in Mozambique
  • Siri Eriksen, Department of Sociology and Human
    Geography, University of Oslo
  • International affiliate at School of
    Environmental Sciences February-August 2006
  • Siri.eriksen_at_sgeo.uio.no

2
Background and problem
  • Term vulnerability being used for many
    different purposes
  • Studies range from identification of food
    deficit, risk to life and property during flood,
    to longer term causes of vulnerability
  • Vulnerability can be considered as
  • Inability to cope (Chambers 1989)
  • An inherent state, caused by structural processes
    (Kelly and Adger 2000 OBrien and Leichenko
    2003)
  • Groups or individuals being in a state of
    inability to secure well-being in the face of
    climatic stress

3
Approach
  • Management of variability and flexibility/diversit
    y important in long term security in the face of
    climate stress
  • Coping strategies as a starting point for
    analysing processes and interactions that shape
    vulnerability
  • Patterns of vulnerability shaped by coping,
    peoples strategies to secure food and income
  • People as active agents rather than passive
    recipients
  • Investigate constraints and opportunities to
    accessing coping strategies and coping
    successfully
  • Focus on why people engaged in particular coping
    strategies and what enabled them to do so
  • Human security versus vulnerability

4
  • Vulnerability has many dimensions in southern
    Africa
  • Time scale
  • Conflict, land reform, environmental change,
    HIV/AIDS, social policies, economic
    liberalisation of agriculture
  • Emerging importance of multiple stressors
  • Climate change and economic liberalisation two
    important global changes affecting Southern
    Africa, but often studied separately
  • How does the interaction between these two
    stressors shape differentiation in vulnerability?

5
Outline of presentation
  • 2001-2003 study (CICERO/Rutgers/UEM) regarding
    rural vulnerability to climatic variability and
    economic liberalisation in southern Africa
  • Focus on market integration
  • 2006-2008 study (Geography, Uni Oslo) Facing
    global change in marginal areas The use of
    diverse biological resources in household
    adaptation strategies
  • Focus on specialisation and biodiversity

6
Limpopo River Basin, Mozambique
7
Method
  • How does market integration affect the local
    pattern of coping and vulnerability?
  • Comparative case study approach between two
    villages with differing levels of market
    integration
  • What were local coping strategies during drought
    and how were they evolving?
  • Who in the community did which activities, and
    what enabled them to do so?
  • Which processes were affecting the emergence,
    evolution and viability of coping strategies?

8
Limpopo River case study sites
9
  • Matidze
  • In Mabalane district
  • Mainly rain-fed farming, a few pump irrigated
    farms
  • Mabalane nearest market (10 km)
  • Train or car to Chokwe
  • Crops, land and agricultural implements lost
    during 2000 floods
  • Affected by the 2001-2003 drought

10
  • Massavasse
  • In Chokwe District
  • Set in irrigation scheme
  • Small, medium, and large scale farmers
  • 14 km from Chokwe market
  • Near main road to Xai-Xai and Maputo
  • Evacuated during the 2000 floods, irrigation
    scheme renovated
  • Affected by the 2001-2003 drought

11
Data collection
  • Stage 1
  • August/September 2002
  • 30 household interviews in each village,
    regarding coping strategies and market
    participation
  • Focus group interviews and key informant
    interviews in each village and the district
    administration
  • Market survey in Mabalane and Chokwe markets

12
Data collection, cont.
  • Stage 2
  • June 2003 drought had intensified
  • Follow-up interviews with 10 households
  • 5 new respondents commercial farmers
  • Market survey in Mabalane and Chokwe
  • Qualitative data analysis comparing coping
    strategies and drought effects during 2002 and
    2003

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Findings
  • Evolution in coping strategies
  • Coping strategies evolve over longer time scales
  • Shifts in coping strategies between 2002 and 2003
  • Widening and narrowing of activities
  • Collapse of the local economy
  • Accessing outside markets

16

17
(No Transcript)
18
Findings, cont.
  • 2. Exclusion
  • Restricted/indirect access to outside markets
  • Ability to engage in larger-scale enterprises
  • Marked differences in vulnerability between the
    villages
  • Large differences in vulnerability within
    Massavasse
  • 3. Local processes affecting vulnerability
  • Social networks under stress
  • HIV/AIDS

19
(No Transcript)
20
Conclusions
  • People are able to evolve their coping strategies
    and access new opportunities, but mainly through
    informal mechanisms, and often at marginal
    benefit.
  • The integration of activities into the formal
    market and being able to invest formally yield
    more successful coping but can be accessed by
    fewer people.
  • Market integration and climate variability create
    relative differences in vulnerability
  • Local market-based activities widely used when
    viable, but they were not viable when under
    severe drought stress

21
Further work Buzi District, Sofala
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Background
  • Global change the two pressures of climate
    change and increasing globalisation of the
    economy
  • Indigenous plant resources critical for coping
    strategies in the face of variable climate
  • Pressure to specialise (commercial agriculture or
    non-agricultural activities)
  • Specialisation of livelihood sources within the
    household

26
Aims
  • Identify the effect of increasing economic
    specialisation on the role of biodiversity use in
    household flexibility
  • Examine interactions and contradictions between
    the need for diverse biological resources in
    coping with climate events and variability, and
    increasing specialisation of production systems
  • Identify how processes involved in globalisation
    affect environmentally marginal areas and
    peoples adaptation to global change
  • Adaptation adjustments in practices, processes
    or structures aimed at moderating or offsetting
    the potential damage or take advantage of
    opportunities created by a given change in
    climate (McCarthy et al 2001).
  • Discerning the political dimensions of adaptation
    in terms of the structural processes that shape
    it, and identifying how adaptation takes place
    differentially, with social differentiation
    within a community and between communities

27
Globalisation of the economy
  • Increased commercialization, export orientation
    and specialization of agricultural production
    form part of increasingly globalised economies
  • Mozambique started a series of market reforms in
    1987 as part of IMF-led structural adjustment
    programmes
  • The agricultural sector has been rapidly
    liberalizing since 1997

28
Use of diverse biological resources
  • The strategies that people use are often dynamic,
    constantly changing with local conditions, as
    people make use of opportunities as they emerge
    and switch rapidly between different types of
    livelihood activities
  • Biological diversity
  • ecological diversity found within an
    area/village, such as that created by an altitude
    gradient
  • diversity in plant species found within one
    ecological zone or area.

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
  • Biological resources typically vary both in space
    and time with climatic and ecological variations
  • example, different types of grass for grazing are
    found in different areas and at different times
    of the seasons
  • Utilising this diversity is important for
  • sustaining agricultural activities
  • many of the diverse strategies that households
    employ in the face of drought, depend directly or
    indirectly on biological resources, such as the
    use of forest products

33
Research questions
  • What is the role of biodiversity, in terms of
    ecological and plant diversity, in local
    adaptation to climate stress in environmentally
    marginal areas?
  • How does increasing specialisation affect farmer
    household use of biodiversity, in particular
    household differentiation?
  • How can management of diversity in the face of
    global change be strengthened?

34
Data collection
  • informal discussions with community members
  • a questionnaire survey collecting household data,
    including adaptation strategies and biodiversity
    use - (socially stratified) sample of 50
    households
  • from the above sample, a total of 10 households
    (socially stratified) selected for qualitative
    semi-structured and open-ended household
    interviews
  • key informant interviews, including a survey to
    observe uses of the grazing areas/forest with a
    key informant

35
Data collection
  • the local significance of vulnerability and
    well-being
  • the way that household economies are adapted to
    climatic variability
  • the role that biodiversity use plays in household
    strategies to secure well-being
  • knowledge generation, social networks and access
    and use of biological resources
  • local histories for two communities regarding
    important events and changes
  • history of agricultural production and
    specialisation
  • a checklist of coping strategies and climate
    adaptations by differently positioned individuals
    and groups
  • the resources required for these coping
    strategies and adaptations and the way in which
    these are secured among different members of the
    community
  • institutions and social relations that are
    important for accessing resources for different
    actors and individuals
  • exchange relations/markets accesses, knowledge
    and technology generation and flows,
  • geographic linkages in household economies in
    terms of remittances, urban-rural linkages, and
    linkages between family members specialised in
    different economic activities
  • data collection in two stages to capture change
    over a growing season

36
Changes the past ten years
  • Severe floods in 2000 and 2001
  • More serious droughts
  • More serious cyclones
  • Increasing temperatures, in 2005 reached up to 42
    degrees without raining
  • Farmers used to plant when the rains came for the
    3rd time in October. Now they must plant during
    the first rains and plant a little more each time
    it rains
  • Farmers have plots on high ground (for when a lot
    of rain) and low ground (when little rain)

37
Commercialisation
  • 10 years ago there were agricultural companies,
    but now there is no employment so they need to
    sell to get money
  • Cost of living is higher, and there is less food
    aid
  • No market in the village, so they carry the
    produce to Beira by chapa or to Buzi in animal
    cart or bicycle
  • Sales rice, sunflower, sesame, cotton, tomatoes,
    pineapple

38
(No Transcript)
39
2005 drought
  • Harvested no rice and maize
  • Harvested sweet potato and cassava (consumption
    and sale)
  • Use forest products (tuber and fruits)
  • Sale of goats and cattle
  • Horticultural crops (beans, cabbage)
  • Children went without food to school
  • Nobody had seeds for planting and they were
    hoping for aid

40
  • Increased trade along new road to Caia
  • Zimbabwean commercial farmers in Chiboio,
    increased trade with Beira
  • Further work 1-2 field trips April-July 2006
  • Buzi (and Chimoio?)

41
  • Question of scale and space
  • Specialisation of agriculture in some areas, not
    in others (commercial farmers in Chiboio)
  • Specialisation among some households, but not
    among others
  • How does specialisation among some households
    affect the access to indigenous plant resources
    by others?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com