A Unified Approach to Design Distributed Amplifiers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Unified Approach to Design Distributed Amplifiers

Description:

Cds. G. S. D. Basic Transmission Line ... Cds=0.015pF. PHEMT. 40mA, 2V. Cgs=0. ... Cds used to decrease the high ratio difference between Cgs and Cds; thereby ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Qual47
Learn more at: https://cseweb.ucsd.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Unified Approach to Design Distributed Amplifiers


1
A Unified Approach to Design Distributed
Amplifiers
Rasit Onur Topaloglu PhD. Student rtopalog_at_cse.ucs
d.edu
2
Limitations with Classical Amplifiers
  • High Gain-bandwidth product is the aim in
    amplifier design
  • Gain-bandwidth product is proportional to
    transconductance over capacitance

G.BW ? gm/C
  • Combining amplifiers in parallel does not help
    as it also increases the total C

3
Tying Amplifier to Device Physics
  • Input and output have capacitive impedances

D
G
Cgs
Cds
S
  • These capacitances can be incorporated in or
    counted as capacitors in a transmission line

4
Basic Transmission Line
  • A low-pass transmission line can easily be
    constructed of inductors and capacitors

..
5
Principle of Distributed Amplification
  • Couple two transmission lines by amplifiers

..
6
Termination of Unwanted Waves
  • There will be forward and backward propagating
    waves at nodes

RFout
..
RFin
..
7
Exploitation of Amplifier Capacitances
  • Input and output capacitances of an amplifier can
    be used to replace capacitors

..
drain line
RFout
..
RFin
gate line
  • Even a single transistor amplifier satisfactory

8
Design Considerations for Transmission Lines
  • Each lines designed to have a cut-off frequency
    larger than targeted operation frequency of
    amplifier by a safe margin

fc1/(? LC)
Zo L/C
9
m-derived Sections for a Better Matching
  • LC sections (constant-k transmission lines)
    matched to load using an m-derived section to
    provide constant Z over a wider range
  • m0.6 is identified as a practical rule of thumb
    value

10
m-derived vs. Constant-k Low-pass T-section
  • m1 corresponds to constant-k

11
m-derived vs. Constant-k Line Z over Frequency
  • m1 corresponds to constant-k

12
Phase Matching of Lines
  • Cgs4Cds for a transistor
  • If L chosen to be constant, C matching required
    on gate and drain lines for a better amplifier
    response
  • Either add additional C in parallel with drain to
    increase itgt provides higher BW
  • Or add additional C in series with gate to reduce
    itgt provides higher gain

13
Staggering to Avoid Gain Peak near Cut-off
  • Staggering is introducing a deliberate mismatch
    between gate and drain lines to avoid a peak near
    line cut-off frequency
  • Drain line cut-off chosen as 0.7 times gate line
    cut-off

14
Number of Sections
  • Increasing number of sections increases gain
    linearly as opposed to quadratic increase in
    cascade amplifiers

Ag1/4 x (Rg?2Cin2Zo)
  • Line losses and parasitics prevent an infinite
    increase

nog1/2 x Ag
  • Optimal number of stages can be explored
    analytically or by simulation

A monolithic GaAs 1-13GHz traveling wave
amplifier, Y. Ayasli, et. al.
15
Design Example
SOI CMOS Traveling Wave Amplifier with NF below
3.8 dB from 0.1-40 GHz, F. Ellinger
16
Design Example
17
Design Example
18
Design Example
19
Design Example
20
SOI CMOS Noise Figure and Gain
21
PHEMT Noise Figure and Gain
Lossy Inductor Model Inductor Q assumed 20 _at_
1GHz with a parasitic series resistor of 10? and
Q being directly proportional to frequency
Technology Comparison SOI CMOS 90nm, 17mA,
2V Cgs0.06pF Cds0.015pF PHEMT 40mA,
2V Cgs0.27pF Cds0.030pF
Higher capacitance values makes possible to use
smaller inductors for same
cut-off frequency
22
Design Considerations for PHEMT
  • Cds used to decrease the high ratio difference
    between Cgs and Cds thereby obtaining a gain
    with less ripple.
  • Compromising high frequency gain, a smoother
    response is obtained
  • Usage of series Cgs would deteriorate low
    frequency response
  • Same inductor value used for both gate and drain
    lines

23
PHEMT GainNoise Optimization
  • Goals are set for gain and noise
  • Random optimization used
  • Only inductor used for the optimization value
    thereby keeping system specific termination and
    source resistors intact

24
PHEMT Optimization Results
After optimization
With some sacrifice in gain ripple, noise figure
has been significantly improved and circuit
operates up to 47GHz
25
Usage of Transmission Lines
After optimization
  • Using Richards transformation, inductors can be
    replaced by transmission lines.
  • Choosing an electrical length of 45? and a
    reference cut-off frequency equal to the gate
    line, optimization gave a Zo of 30.6 and an
    operation range of up to 57 GHz for noise
    considerations

26
Conclusions
  • Broadband techniques will not be able to outdo
    distributed amplifiers
  • Distributed amplifiers, an ancient field of
    study, will continue evolving as a good field to
    work in
  • 60GHz low noise amplifiers for optical circuits
    are almost here

27
Design Plan
  • Given gain and bandwidth considerations,
  • Identify pick fc and Zo for gate line to find Lg
    and

fc1/(? LC)
Zo L/C
  • Using staggering with 0.7

Ld(1/0.7)Lg
Cd(1/0.7)Cg
  • Find shunt capacitance to get Cd from device model

28
Design Plan
  • Identify device size using Cg

WL Cg/Cox
  • Using staggering with 0.7

Ld(1/0.7)Lg
Cd(1/0.7)Cg
  • Find shunt capacitance to get Cd from device model
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com