Title: Bu 604 Session 4
1Bu 604 Session 4
- Interpersonal Dynamics Teams
2Agenda
- Introduction and Lessons from Last Day
- Discussion of Interpersonal Communications in
Organizations and Teams - Carter Racing
- Revisiting the Question of Team Effectiveness
- Case Dividing the Pie
3Examples of National Cultural Values
4Competing Values Framework
5Exhibit 1-2 Skills in the New Workplace
Flexibility
Innovator
Mentor
Broker
Facilitator
Internal Focus
External Focus
Monitor
Producer
Coordinator
Director
Control
6Three-Component Model of Organizational Commitment
Involves Emotional attachment to, identification
with, involvement in the organization
Affective Commitment
Belief that it is ones moral obligation to
remain with the organization
Normative Commitment
Continuance Commitment
Reflects perceived cost associated with
discontinuing employment
7Responses to Job Satisfaction - EVLN Model
Active
Exit Sabotage
Voice
Constructive
Destructive
Loyalty
Neglect
Passive
8Communication Problems?
- People spend nearly 70 percent of waking hours
communicatingwriting, reading, speaking,
listening - WorkCanada survey of 2039 Canadians in six
industrial and service categories found - 61 of senior executives believed they
communicated effectively with employees -
- 33 of managers department heads believed that
senior executives were effective communicators. - 22 of hourly workers, 27 of clerical employees,
and 22 of professional staff reported senior
execs did a good job communicating with them - Canadians reported less favourable perceptions
about their companys communications than did
Americans
9Communications Process
10Communication Terms
- Communication
- The transfer of meaning among people
- Sender
- Establishes a message, encodes the message, and
chooses the channel to send it - Receiver
- Decodes the message and provides feedback to the
sender
11Communication Terms
- Message
- What is communicated.
- Encoding
- Converting a message to symbolic form.
- Channel
- The medium through which a message travels
- Decoding
- Retranslating a senders message.
12Choosing Channels
- Channels differ in their capacity to convey
information. - Rich channels have the ability to
- Handle multiple cues simultaneously
- Facilitate rapid feedback
- Be very personal
13Exhibit 7-2Hierarchy of Channel Richness
Channel richness
Type of message
Information medium
Richest
Nonroutine, ambiguous
Face to face talk
Telephone
Computer
Memos, letters
Flyers, bulletins general reports
Leanest
Routine, clear
14Communication Flows in Organizations
- Downward
- Communication that flows from one level of a
group to a lower level - Managers to employees
- Upward
- Communication that flows to a higher level of a
group - Employees to manager
- Lateral
- Communication among members of the same work
group, or individuals at the same level
15Barriers to Effective Communication
- Filtering
- Refers to a sender manipulating information so
that it will be seen more favourably by the
receiver. - Selective Perception
- Receivers in the communication process
selectively see and hear based on their needs,
motivations, experience, background, and other
personal characteristics.
16Barriers to Effective Communication
- Defensiveness
- When individuals interpret anothers message as
threatening, they often respond in ways that
retard effective communication. - Language
- Words mean different things to different people.
17Communication Flows in Organizations
- Downward communication that flows from one level
of a group to a lower level - managers to employees
- Upward communication that flows to a higher
level of a group - employees to manager
- Lateral communication among members of the same
work group, or individuals at the same level
18Communication Questions for Consideration
- How does communication flow in organizations?
- What helps and inhibits communication in an
organization? - How can we improve communication?
- Are there gender and ethnic differences in
communications?
Questions for Consideration
19Networks
- Connections by which information flow
- Formal
- Task-related communications that follow the
authority chain - Informal
- Communications that flow along social and
relational lines
20Networks and Their Effectiveness
21The Grapevine
- 75 percent of employees hear about matters first
through rumours on the grapevine - Grapevine the organizations informal network
- Grapevine has three main characteristics
- Not controlled by management
- Most employees perceive it as being more
believable and reliable than formal communiqués
issued by top management - Largely used to serve the self-interests of those
people within it
22Purpose of Rumours
- To structure and reduce anxiety
- To make sense of limited or fragmented
information - To serve as a vehicle to organize group members,
and possibly outsiders, into coalitions - To signal a senders status or power
23Reducing the Negative Consequences of Rumours
- 1. Announce timetables for making important
decisions. - 2. Explain decisions and behaviours that may
appear inconsistent or secretive. - 3. Emphasize the downside, as well as the upside,
of current decisions and future plans. - 4. Openly discuss worst case possibilities it is
almost never as anxiety provoking as the unspoken
fantasy.
24Nonverbal Communication
- Messages conveyed through body movements, facial
expressions, and the physical distance between
the sender and the receiver - Kinesics
- The study of body motions, such as gestures,
facial configurations, and other movements of the
body - Proxemics
- The study of physical space in interpersonal
relationships
25Communication Barriers Between Men and Women
- Men use talk to emphasize status, women use it to
create connection - Women and men tend to approach points of conflict
differently
26Communication Barriers Between Men and Women
- Men and women view directness and indirectness
differently - Women interpret male directness as an assertion
of status and one-upmanship - Men interpret female indirectness as covert,
sneaky, and weak - Men criticize women for apologizing, but women
say Im sorry to express empathy
27Cross-Cultural Communication Difficulties
- Sources of barriers
- Semantics
- Word connotations
- Tonal differences
28Culture Contexts
- Cultures differ in how much the context makes a
difference in communication - High-context cultures
- Cultures that rely heavily on nonverbal and
subtle situational cues in communication. - Â Low-context cultures
- Cultures that rely heavily on words to convey
meaning in communication
29High- vs. Low-Context Cultures
High
Chinese
context
Korean
Japanese
Vietnamese
Arab
Greek
Spanish
Italian
English
North American
Scandinavian
Swiss
Low
context
German
30Cross-Cultural Communications Helpful Rules
- Seek out guidance and mentoring from competent
individuals who will tell you what you need to
hear - Assume differences until similarity is proven,
but test out these assumptions. - Emphasize description rather than interpretation
or evaluation. - Practice empathy.
- Treat your interpretations as a working
hypothesis.
31Making Feedback More Effective
- Feedback to those being evaluated should be
anonymous and aggregated - Raters should only evaluate employee behaviour
that they know about and have experienced
first-hand - Raters should receive orientation and training to
do the evaluations - Recipients should receive guidance on how to
interpret the feedback
32Effective Listening
- If you want to improve your listening skills,
look to these behaviours as guides - Make eye contact.
- Exhibit affirmative head nods and appropriate
facial expressions. - Avoid distracting actions or gestures.
- Ask questions.
- Paraphrase.
- Avoid interrupting the speaker.
- Dont over talk.
- Make smooth transitions between the roles of
speaker and listener.
33Communication Questions
- What types of difficulties have you experienced
when communicating with someone from a different
culture than yours? - How do you let the other person know you have
heard what they are saying? How often do you do
this? - Describe an example of communication breakdown.
What led to the breakdown?
34HR Implications
- Providing Performance Feedback
35When to Use 360-degree Feedback
- For employee development rather than for
personnel decisions - As part of a formal goal-setting system
- On a regular basis and not just once
36The Conflicts in Performance Appraisal
- Organizational Goals
- To allocate rewards and make personnel decisions.
- To develop and grow individuals
- Individual Goals
- To obtain performance feedback in order to
improve. - To maintain self image and increase rewards.
37Factors Contributing to the Effectiveness of P.A.
Interviews
- Skills in communications
- Preparation
- By Superior organization and job goals,
standards of performance - By Subordinate organization and job goals, own
assessment of strengths and weaknesses, personal
development plan - Process ve attitude by both parties
- Substance action plan future targets
relationship development
38The Politics of Appraisal
- Downgrade appraisals to keep up the motivation
- Softening the assessment since it is part of a
permanent record - Inflating/deflating assessments to maximize or
minimize raises - Inflating / deflating appraisals to keep / get
rid of subordinates - Deflating ratings to teach a lesson or to make a
case for dismissal
39The Case Against Performance Appraisal - Peter
Scholtes
- Any employees work is tied to many systems but
performance evaluations focus on individuals. - Most work is the product of a group. Performance
evaluation encourages lone ranger behaviour. - Superior only performance evaluation ignores
valuable data but 360 feedback is cumbersome and
time consuming.
40- Performance evaluations assume predictable
systems -- something that is increasingly untrue. - Performance evaluation requires objective,
consistent, fair processes. Such objectivity and
consistency do not exist.
41Goal Systems vs the Reality of Work
- Reality of work
- Many activities, short duration
- Ad hoc informal interactions
- Non-routing and lots of variety
- Legitimate authority
- Low priority to many human resource tasks
- Goal Systems Need
- Advance planning
- Formal meetings and sessions
- Prescribed systems, schedules, forms
- Coach, counsellor
- Sponsored by HR staff
42If you need to do peer evaluation.
- Remember that the purpose is both to improve
performance AND strengthen the group. You will
need time! - One process decide on 5-7 criteria of
performance (eg. preparation, attendance,
helpfulness, effort, etc) - Rate everyone, including yourself, collect the
ratings on each person and share them (make them
public)
43- Person by person discuss the ratings.
- Start with each persons self assessment, then
each person discuss their evaluation. That will
probably be easier. - Be descriptive and as behavioural as possible.
Avoid blaming. Use I messages and lots of
listening - Move to agreement on behaviours.
44Summary and Implications Communication
- A common theme regarding the relationship between
communication and employee satisfaction - The less uncertainty, the greater the
satisfaction - Distortions, ambiguities, and incongruities all
increase uncertainty - Less distortion in communication equals
- More goal attainment, and better feedback
- Reduction in ambiguity and distortion
- Ambiguity between verbal and nonverbal
communiqués increase uncertainty and reduce
satisfaction - The goal of perfect communication is unattainable
- The issue of communication is critical to
motivation
45Assignment for Next Week
- Ch 4 and 13
- Case The Well Paid Receptionist
- Bring along a copy of the job description for the
least motivating job in your organization
46- Teams Team Decision Making
47Teams Are Not Always the Answer
- A critical look at four of the assumptions
- Mature teams are task oriented successfully
minimize the negative impact of other group
forces. - Individual, group, and organizational goals can
all be integrated into common team goals. - Participative or shared leadership is always
effective. - The team environment drives out the subversive
forces of politics, power, and conflict that
divert groups from efficiently doing their work. - Are these true all the time?
48Stages of Group Development
49Team Model - Forrester Drexler
Formation
Vitality
Dependability
Note F D argue that this is not a
developmental Model
Impact
Focus
Coordination
Buy-In
50Team Based Model
- Formation
- Dependability
- Focus
- Composition, Fit and support
- Trust Information Sharing, Follow Through and
Reciprocity - Direction, Measurement, Accountability
From Forrester Drexler, A Model for Team Based
Organization Performance
51Team Based Model (cont.)
- Buy-In
- Coordination
- Impact
- Vitality
- Balanced Power, Resources, Values
- Plans, Communications, Integrating Mechanisms
- Innovation, Flexibility, Results
- Enthusiasm, Openness, Learning
52The Punctuated-Equilibrium Model
53Group Performance Factors
Size
Composition
Performance
Cohesiveness
Norms
Environment, Supervision, Resources Nature of
Task
54Team Roles
- TASK ORIENTED ROLES
- Agenda Setter, Analyzer, Co-ordinator, Evaluator,
Information Giver...Seeker, Initiator - MAINTENANCE ROLES
- Encourager, Follower, Gatekeeper, Group Observer,
Harmonizer, Standard Setter - INDIVIDUAL ROLES
- Avoider, Blocker, Clown, Dominator, Recognition
Seeker
55Groupthink
1) Illusion of invulnerability
2) Construct rationalizations
3) Morality of position is unquestioned
4) Stereotypes--distort image of other parties
5) Pressure applied to those who express doubts
about the groups position
6) Self-censorship--deviations from consensus are
avoided
7) Illusion of unanimity
8) Mindguards--leaders and fellow members
protected from adverse information
56Warning Signs of Groupthink
- Teams isolating themselves from external sources
of information through mindguards - Feeling under pressure
- Exhibiting defensiveness - e.g., stereotyping
others -
- Feeling they are doing what is moral or right
- Minimizing the public expression of doubt
- Having strong leaders that intentionally or
unintentionally discourage input and real debate - Creating the illusion of unanimity by
self-censorship - Creating the illusion of invulnerability
57The Groupthink Process
- Characteristics of Groupthink
- Illusion of invulnerability
- Collective rationalization
- Belief in the inherent morality of the team
- Stereotypes of other groups
- Self-censorship
- Illusion of unanimity
- Self-appointed mind guards
- Groupthink Leads to Defective Decision Making in
Terms of - Incomplete survey of alternatives
- Incomplete survey of goals
- Failure to examine risks of preferred choice
- Selective bias in processing information at hand
- Failure to reappraise alternatives
- Failure to work out contingency plans
- Initial Conditions
- High Cohesiveness
- Insulation of team from outsiders
- Lack of methodical procedures for search
appraisal - Directive leadership
- High stress with low hope for finding a better
solution than one favoured by the leader or other
influential person - Complex/changing environment
Conformity- Seeking Tendency of Group
58Remedies to Groupthink
- Assign encourage the role of critical evaluator
in each group member - Leaders should avoid stating preferences adopt
an impartial stance - Use multiple groups to work on the same questions
- Protect security, but seek outside council
insight - Invite outside experts have experts challenge
the views of core members
59Remedies to Groupthink (cont.)
- When discussing alternatives, at least 1 person
should be assigned the devils advocate role,
to fully evaluate options - Take time to address how enemies may respond -
develop scenarios - When evaluating policy alternatives, break up
into small groups then reform to sort through
differences - After reaching a preliminary consensus, group
should hold a second-guess meeting - 10 The behaviour of the leader is key
60CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE EXECUTIVE TEAMS
- MINIMUM POLITICS AND PERSONAL AGENDAS
- ROLES AND ACCOUNTABILITIES UNDERSTOOD
- ACCEPTED
- EMPHASIS ON FACT BASED JUDGMENT
- LOTS OF DISCUSSION PARTICIPATION
- LEADER DOES NOT DOMINATE OR DEFER
61CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE EXECUTIVE TEAMS
(cont.)
- A CLIMATE OF TRUST AND SUPPORT
- RISK TAKING IS ENCOURAGED
- CRITICISM IS CONSTRUCTIVE NO
- PERSONAL ATTACKS
- PRESENCE OR ACCESS TO REQUISITE SKILLS
- AND DIVERSITY
62GUIDELINES FOR EFFECTIVECONSENSUS
1) COMMIT TO THE PROCESS AND SEARCH FOR BEST
SOLUTIONS
2) AVOID VIEWING THE PROCESS IN WIN / LOSE TERMS
3) STATE YOUR POSITION CLEARLY, BUT LISTEN
CAREFULLY TO ALL
4) ATTEMPT TO INVOLVE ALL IN DECISION MAKING
PROCESS CONFLICT (PROPERLYMANAGED) ENHANCES
DECISION MAKING
5) AVOID SIMPLISTIC TECHNIQUES TO RESOLVE DISPUTES
6) BUDGET TIME SO ALL IMPORTANT ASPECTS ARE
INVESTIGATED, PROBLEM DEFINITION AND STRATEGY
DEVELOPMENT ARE N.B.
7) MANAGE MAINTENANCE AND TASK FUNCTIONS IN THE
GROUP
YOU CAN ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING IF YOU DONT CARE
WHO GETS THE CREDIT.
63Use Individual Decision Making When 1. You have
the information to make a good decision 2. The
situation is urgent 3. Subordinates are already
committed or their commitment doesnt matter
Use Groups For Decision Making When 1. No one
knows the answer or the expertise is in the
group 2. You want to increase the commitment of
subordinates 3. The situation is not urgent in
the sense that it requires an immediate
response 4. You, as manager, can live with choice
64The Psychological Contract
- Psychological Contract
- it is a persons set of expectations regarding
what he or she will contribute to the
organization and what the organization, in turn,
will provide to the individual.
65Team Contract
- What would it look like if the psychological
contact existing between team members was made
more explicit in the team charter and used by the
group to help it actively manage its development
and the outcomes achieved?
66Dividing the Pie
- What is your assessment of the underlying problem
in the case and your analysis of the situation? - What are the consequences if it is not resolved?
- What would you recommend they do and how would
you proceed?
67Organizational Congruence Model
TRANFORMATION PROCESS
OUTPUT SYSTEMS LEVEL UNIT/GROUP LEVEL INDIVI
DUAL LEVEL
INFORMAL STRUCTURE PROCESS INDIVIDUAL
INPUT ENVIRONMENT (P.E.S.T.) RESOURCES
HISTORY/ CULTURE
S T R A T E G Y
FORMAL STRUCTURE
WORK