Environment and Security: Management, coordination

1
Environment and Security Management,
coordination

• ????????? ??????????????? ??????? ??????????????
  ????????? ????????? ?????? ??????? ???????????,
  ???????????? ? ???????????
• ?. ???????, 11-12 ???? 2006

Ben Slay, Director UNDP Bratislava Regional
Centre
2
June Management Board meeting Key questions

• Future of Ferghana Valley projects
• Finalisation versus continuation
• Need for project assessments
• Support for national focal points
• Funding for assistants
• National coordination groups
• Links between CARNET, Aarhus centres

3
When to finalise?

• Unsuccessful projects
• Insufficient donor or programme country support
  for continuation
• Successful projects that
• Cannot be scaled up or replicated
• Should be in a different programme (GEF?)
• Have high opportunity costs
• Resources should be redeployed elsewhere

4
When to continue?

• Project enjoys continued support from
• Programme country(s)
• Donors
• A clear decision can be made about whether the
  project should be
• Continued
• Replicated
• Scaled up
• Outcome inclusion into Ferghana Valley work plan
  for 2008-2010

5
Assistance to National Focal Points

• ENVSEC Management Board acknowledges the need
• Funding modalities in question
• Should be linked to specific project
• Should be hired by CO and report principally to
  RDO

6
National coordination groups

• Principal body for coordination with
• Stakeholders
• Other donors, projects, international agencies
• Best modality for IAEA coordination
• Country assistants to facilitate groups
• Routines at the individual project level needed
  if this coordination is to work

7
Roles of CARNet, Aarhus Centres

• Links between Osh Aarhus Centre and CARNet
  established
• Work still needed
• REHRA information dissemination can improve
• RESCA routines for coordination lacking
• Other projects similar issues