History and Risk Assessment of Triazine Herbicides in the Lower Mississippi River - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

History and Risk Assessment of Triazine Herbicides in the Lower Mississippi River

Description:

Some browsers and monitors will distort the text image of this presentation. ... Literature sources (Moody, 1995; Pereira et al., 1995; Coupe et al., 1995) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:147
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: ranithiy
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: History and Risk Assessment of Triazine Herbicides in the Lower Mississippi River


1
Some browsers and monitors will distort the text
image of this presentation. If this happens,
click the 'download presentation source' option
of the previous page to open this document in
another viewing window. The viewer may 'save' or
'print' from the new window.
2
History and Risk Assessment of Triazine
Herbicides in the Lower Mississippi River
William E. Hartley1 Luann E. White1 James E.
Bollinger2 Arunthavarani Thiyagarajah1 Jeffery M.
Mendler2 William J. George2 1School of Public
Health and Tropical Medicine 2Department of
Pharmacology/Toxicology, School of
Medicine Tulane University New Orleans,
Louisiana
3
Table 1. Summary Data on Selected Triazine
Herbicides Atrazine Concentration in
ug/L Date Median 75 95 Max 75-79 0.56
5 1.08 2.47 17.8 80-84 0.44 1.1 3.5 16 85
-89 0.46 0.8 2.4 6.2 90-94 0.46 1.21 3.33
5.6 95-97 0.31 1.1 2.66 4.9 Overall 0.47 1
.1 2.92 17.8 Cyanazine, Unfiltered 92-94
0.151 0.69 5.97 10.2187 95-97 0.124 0.3 0.
86 1.44019 Simazine, Unfiltered 92-94 0.1
2 0.2 0.43 1.39 95-97 0.12 0.27 1.48 3.79

4
Table 2. Systemic Toxicity- Drinking Water-
Margin of Exposure (MOE) and Median/MCL
Ratios ATRAZINE Date MOE
MOE 75th MOE 95th MOE Median Median perc
entile percentile Max /MCL 75-79 5
x 10-4 9 x 10-4 2 x 10-3 2 x 10-2
0.19 80-84 4 x 10-4 9 x 10-4 3 x 10-3 1 x
10-2 0.15 85-89 4 x 10-4 7 x 10-4 2 x
10-3 5 x 10-3 0.15 90-94 4 x 10-4 1 x
10-3 3 x 10-3 5 x 10-3 0.15 95-97 3 x
10-4 9 x 10-4 2 x 10-3 4 x 10-3
0.10 Overall 4 x 10-4 9 x 10-4 2 x 10-3 2 x
10-2 0.17
5
Table 2. Systemic Toxicity- Drinking Water-
Margin of Exposure (MOE) and Median/MCL
Ratios Date MOE MOE 75th MOE 95th MOE
Median Median percentile percentile Max
/MCL CYANAZINE 92-94 2 x
10-3 1 x 10-2 8 x 10-2 2 x 10-1 NA 95-97 2 x
10-3 4 x 10-3 1 x 10-2 2 x 10-2 NA SIMAZINE
92-94 7 x 10-4 1 x 10-3 3 x 10-3 8 x
10-3 0.03 95-97 7 x 10-4 2 x 10-3 9 x 10-3 2 x
10-2 0.03
6
  • Purpose
  • To characterize the water quality data from
    1975-1998
  • on triazine herbicides in the Mississippi River
    south of
  • Memphis, TN
  • To conduct health and environmental risk
    assessment
  • based on temporal trends in the data

7
  • Introduction
  • Triazine herbicides are a group of chemically
    similar herbicides including simazine, propazine,
    prometryn, prometon, cyanazine, ametryn and
    atrazine
  • The USEPA in an evaluation of the STORET
    database found atrazine in 4,123 of 10,942
    surface water samples analyzed, representing
    1,659 surface water locations in 31 states. The
    85th percentile value of all non-zero samples was
    2.3 ppb
  • Cyanazine was found in 1,708 of 5,297 surface
    water samples
  • analyzed, representing 392 surface water
    locations in seven
  • states. The 85th percentile value for all
    non-zero samples was
  • 4.11 ppb

8
USGS, 1992
9
USGS (1992)
10
USGS (1992)
11
  • Introduction
  • Triazine herbicides - found in Mississippi
    River water reflecting usage during the past 30
    years
  • Atrazine concentrations in the Mississippi
    River from 5/1/91 to 3/1/92 were highest during
    May and June, immediately following pesticide
    application and spring rains and dropped below
    detection limits in late summer
  • Maximum concentrations of 3.6 ppb atrazine
    in June, 1991, in the Mississippi River near
    Baton Rouge, LA. Larson et al. (1995)

12
  • Methods
  • Tulane University Mississippi River Database
    Project
  • Repository of existing water-quality data
    for the Lower Mississippi River, for the area
    just south of Memphis to the receiving waters of
    the Gulf of Mexico
  • Three million records of over 800 water
    quality parameters
  • Data, collected from academia, government,
    industry and municipal water works, were
    integrated into a relational information system
  • Comprehensive source of water-quality
    information available on the lower Mississippi
    River as a single database (Preslan et al., 1997)

13
  • Methods
  • Sources of Triazine Herbicide Data
  • Louisiana Department of Environmental
    Quality (LADEQ)
  • US Geological Survey (USGS)/ US
    Environmental Protection Agencies Storage and
    Retrieval System (STORET)
  • Literature sources (Moody, 1995 Pereira et
    al., 1995 Coupe et al., 1995)
  • Jefferson Water Works (JWW) and Orleans
    Water Works (OWW)
  • Novartis (formerly Ciba-Geigy Corporation
    Tierney, 1992)
  • Academic sources (DeLeon et al., 1986)

14
  • Data Validation and Assumptions
  • Duplicate records removed
  • Replaced non-detects with the reported
    detection limit
  • Visual inspection of the triazine data
    indicated no apparent outlying points
  • Variations in triazine concentrations due to
    sampling location were generally assumed to be
    insignificant throughout the study area - the
    Lower Mississippi River receives very little
    discharge from its surrounding area south of the
    Arkansas River confluence (Sabins, 1997 Wells,
    1980 USACOE, 1976 Everett, 1971)

15
  • Assumptions
  • Similar location assumptions were made with
    regard to source agency - few instances of
    spatial and temporal overlap between interagency
    data were available for comparison
  • Exception - atrazine data - relative
    abundance of data allowed for comparison between
    agencies as well as between filtered and
    unfiltered water fractions

16
Assumptions Nonparametric statistical
comparisons were conducted on weekly means of
atrazine data, grouped by source agency or water
fraction, to determine whether these data could
be integrated into a single large set. Paired
sets of data from coinciding weeks were analyzed
using the Kruskel-Wallis test (using analysis of
variance on rank-transformed data), with a p
0.05 level of significance (Helsel and Hirsch,
1993). Because no significant differences were
found with respect to sample agency (where
temporal overlap existed) or between filtered and
unfiltered data, all available atrazine data were
combined for the purposes of temporal
characterization and risk analysis.
17
  • Health and Environmental Assessment Methods
  • Risk Assessment National Academy of
    Sciences Guidelines
  • Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)
  • Drinking Water SDWA Exposure Assumptions
  • Consumption of Fish USEPA Guidance for Fish
    Consumption Advisories
  • Ecological Risk Canadian National
    Guidelines

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
  • Results
  • Approximately 5,368 records located on
    triazine herbicides from six existing databases
  • Most of the records came from JWW,
    Novartis, and LADEQ
  • Approximately two hundred (200) or fewer
    records were available per year up to 1990 with
    typically greater than 500 records available from
    1991 1997

29
  • Results
  • Atrazine, cyanazine and simazine were found
    in significant concentrations
  • Propazine, prometryn, prometon, and ametryn
    were at low to trace concentrations
  • Based on previously cited application
    patterns, it is expected that atrazine,
    cyanazine, and simazine would be found at
    significant concentrations

30
  • Results
  • Atrazine
  • Primarily atrazine records on filtered water
    from 1975- 1993 and atrazine records on
    unfiltered water from 1994-1998
  • Consider that atrazine measured in whole and
    filtered water are not significantly different to
    consider analyzing them as separate data sets
  • Median atrazine concentrations are higher
    particularly during 1990 and 1993 during which
    there were peak rainfall and/or flood events in
    the upper Mississippi River

31
  • Results
  • Atrazine
  • Seasonal analysis of the atrazine levels
    shows expected higher atrazine concentrations in
    June, July and August which is associated with
    peak triazine pesticide usage on crops,
    particularly in the upper Mississippi River
  • Lower Mississippi River is highly confined
    by levees and it is unlikely that significant
    loads of atrazine would enter from local
    agriculture except in the event of extreme
    flooding which has not occurred

32
  • Results
  • Cyanazine
  • Cyanazine in filtered and unfiltered
    Mississippi River has remained relatively stable
    based on annual averages throughout the study
    period with the exception of 1993 during which
    there was a significant increase probably due to
    flooding of the upper Mississippi River
  • Seasonal concentrations of cyanazine were
    typical with significant increases during the
    June to August period and relatively trace levels
    during the remainder of the year

33
  • Results
  • Simazine
  • From 1997-1998, simazine shows a pattern of
    increasing concentration beginning in 1992 with
    the most striking increases beginning in 1996
  • Causes for this increase in simazine are
    unknown since there are no unusual rainfall
    events or flooding in the upper Mississippi River
    after 1993

34
  • Results
  • Atrazine
  • For atrazine, median concentrations and 75th
    and 95th percentile values are similar based on
    analysis of intervals in five year segments with
    the exception of 95th percentile values for the
    1980-84 and 1990-94 periods

35
  • Results
  • The MOE values indicate that for atrazine,
    cyanazine, and simazine, the values fall well
    below MOE 1.0. This indicates that none of the
    chemicals exceed the safe lifetime exposure dose
    (RFD)
  • Exposure to maximum values would not exceed
    the safe dose
  • Using a worst case additive toxicity model
    for all three chemicals under the assumption of
    similar modes of toxicity, the cumulative MOE or
    Hazard Index (HI) would not exceed 1.0
  • The MCL is not exceeded for atrazine and
    simazine. However, some 95th percentile
    concentrations and maximum concentrations do
    exceed the MCL. This poses a legal and regulatory
    issue that may result in an array of remedies
    under the SDWA

36
  • Health Risk from Fish Consumption
  • Exposure assumptions one fish meal per
    week, 70 kg body weight person, and 100
    absorption of atrazine
  • Maximum concentration found in a white bass
    fillet was 0.058 mg atrazine per kg fillet
    (LADEQ, 1995)
  • There were no significant health risks from
    fish consumption due to atrazine

37
  • Ecological Risks
  • Environment Canada (Government)
    aquatic-life guidelines
  • Atrazine 2 ppb
  • Cyanazine 2 ppb
  • Simazine 10 ppb
  • All median atrazine, cyanazine, and simazine
    concentrations were below the Canadian
    guidelines.
  • Some 95th percentile and maximum
    concentrations of atrazine and cyanazine exceeded
    the Canadian guidelines

38
  • Conclusions
  • Available historical water quality data from
    1975-1997 for triazine herbicides in the
    Mississippi River south of Memphis, TN were
    characterized in terms of temporal trends and
    with respect to ecological and human health risks
  • The most abundant of the triazine compounds
    was atrazine (median concentration 0.47 ppb),
    which also represented the largest dataset,
    followed by cyanazine, and simazine

39
  • Conclusions
  • Extreme rainfall or flooding events in the
    upper Mississippi River Basin were associated
    with increased annual medians for triazine
    herbicides in the lower Mississippi River
  • Based on the safe lifetime doses, the
    Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs), and aquatic
    life guidelines for atrazine, cyanazine, and
    simazine, no significant health or ecological
    risks from use of Mississippi River water are
    predicted

40
Close this window to return to Publications and
Presentations Index
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com