Title: Using Scoring Guides
1 Using Scoring Guides
- Current perspectives on classroom assessment and
student achievement - L.B. Uveges
- November 27, 2007
2Research
- Research consistently shows that regular,
high-quality CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT increases
student achievement
3- The key to improvement is how students and
teachers USE assessment information
4- Weighing the pig, doesnt mean hell gain
weight
5- Assessment tools that calculate solely how well
student achievement measures up to the standards,
however reliable, will not suffice. Assessment
must serve as a vehicle for improving the quality
of learning for every student. - - National Research Council, 2001
6Crunching the numbers
- Grades based on averaging have meaning only when
averaging repeated measures of similar content.
Teachers average marks on fractions, word
problems, geometry, and addition with marks for
attendance, homework, and notebooks- and call it
mathematics. In mathematics, we teach that you
cannot average apples, oranges and bananas, but
we do it in our gradebooks! (Ken OConnor)
7- Ideas about assessment have undergone important
changes in recent years. In the new view,
assessment and learning are 2 sides of the same
coinwhen students engage in assessments, they
should learn from those assessments. - - National Research Council, 1999
8Formative Assessment
- All those activities undertaken by teachers and
by their students (that) provide information to
be used as feedback to modify the teaching and
learning activities in which they are engaged. - - Black Wiliam, 1998
9Communication
- We must constantly remind ourselves that the
ultimate purpose of education is to have students
become self-evaluating. If students graduate
from our schools still dependent on others to
tell them when they are adequate, good, or
excellent, then we have missed the whole point of
what education is about - (Costa and Kallick 1992)
10- Grades are merely symbols in order to provide
real information, they should be seen as only a
part- probably a very small part- of our
communication system - (Ken OConnor)
11Formative Assessment 3 Guiding Questions
- Where are you trying to go?
- Where are you now?
- How can you get there?
12- The QUALITY of the feedback rather than its
existence or absence is what determines its power - - Bangert-Dewns, Kulik, Kulik Morgan, 1991
Sadler, 1989
13- With regard to feedback, research makes the case
for the use of DESCRIPTIVE, CRITERION-BASED
feedback as opposed to numerical scoring or
letter grades without clear criteria. - -Butler Neuman, 1995
14- Research shows that feedback that EMPHASIZES
LEARNING GOALS leads to greater learning gains
than feedback that emphasizes self-esteem - -Ames, 1992 Butler, 1998
15- When receiving feedback emphasizing self-esteem,
high-performing students often attribute their
performance to effort and low-performing students
attribute their performance to lack of ability.
16- Student SELF-assessment is crucial for feedback
to be used effectively. Students are the ones
who must ultimately take action to bridge the gap
between where they are and where they are heading - - Sadler, 1989
17- Effective learners operate best when they have
insight into their own strengths and weaknesses
and access to their own repertoires of strategies
for learning. - -Brown, 1994
18- In a year-long teacher-researcher collaborative
project, Rudd and Gladstone (1993) helped foster
self-assessment skills through questionnaires,
concept maps, and self-assessment maps. They
report the following results
19- Development of students abilities to plan and
think through their goals and skills - Creation of student awareness of the importance
of evaluating their own work - Development of students abilities to evaluate
each others self-assessment and provide
constructive criticism - Increase in students abilities to manage
resources and time more effectively.
20- The process of engaging in self-assessment
increases students COMMITMENT to achieving
important goals. - - Covington, 1992
21SEVEN strategies for using a scoring guide as a a
teaching tool
- 1- Teach students the language of quality- the
concepts behind strong performance. - How do your students already describe what a
strong product or performance looks like? How
does their prior knowledge relate to the elements
of the scoring guide you will use? How can you
get them to refine their vision of quality
22What you can do
- ASK students to brainstorm characteristics of
good quality work - Show samples of work (low and high quality) and
ask them to expand their list of quality - Ask students if theyd like to see what teachers
think. - Have them analyze how student-friendly versions
of the scoring guide match to what they said
232- Read (view) score, and discuss anonymous
sample products or performances
- Some strong and some weak some representing
problems they commonly experience, especially the
problems that drive you nuts! - Ask students to use the rubric to score real
samples of student work. Since there is no
single correct score, only justifiable scores,
ask students to justify their scores using
wording from the rubric. Begin with a single
trait. - Progress to multiple traits when students are
proficient with single-trait scoring
243 Let students use the scoring guide to practice
and rehearse revising
- Its not enough to merely ask students to judge
work and justify their judgments. Students also
need to understand how to revise work to make it
better. Begin by choosing work that needs
revision on a signle trait
25What to do
- Ask students to brainstorm advice for the author
on how to improve his or her work. Then ask
students to revise the work using their own
advice (in pairs) - Ask students to write a letter to the creator of
the sample, suggesting what she/he could do to
make the sample strong for the trait discussed - Ask students to work on a product or performance
of their own that is currently in process,
revising for the trait discussed
264 Share examples of products or performances
from life beyond school- both strong and weak
- Have them analyze these samples for quality using
the scoring guide
275- Model creating the product or performance
yourself
- Show the messy underside- the true beginnings-
how you think through decisions along the way. - Ask students to analyze YOUR work for quality and
make suggestions on improvement. - Revise your work using their advice
- Ask them to again review it for quality
286 Encourage students to share what they know
- People consolidate understanding when they
practice describing and articulating criteria for
quality
29Ask them to
- Write self-reflections, letters to parents,
papers describing the process they went through
to create a product or performance. Use the
language of the scoring guide - Revise the scoring guide for younger students,
make bulleted lists of elements of quality,
develop posters illustrating the traits, or write
a description of quality as they now understand
it I used to but now I) - Participate in conferences with parents and/or
teachers to share their achievement.
307 Design lessons and activities around the
traits of the scoring guide
- Reorganize what you already teach and find or
design additional lessons
31Rubrics
32Assessment Rubric
- TARGET- focused on target (PIs)
- METHOD- Does it match the target?
- CRITERIA- Is the purpose / goal clear and
specific? - TIMEFRAME- Does it meet time allotted/allowed?
- SAMPLING- Are there enough questions to get a
valid idea of students achievement? - VALIDITY- Does it measure what I want to measure?
- BIAS/DISTORTION- Are there any elements of either
bias of distortion?
33Data Skills Self Assessment
- Review the self-checklist
- Rank from 0-5 (low-high)
34PDSA/COAU??
- Plan-Do-Study-Act
- Collect-Organize-Analyze-Use
- Collect the data needed
- Organize it (notebooks, excel, content areas)
- Analyze (data tables, charts, graphs, trangulate,
disaggregate) - Use- make decisions about learning- set criteria
for measurement, improve student achievement
35How do we get students to take responsibility?
- Student involved classroom assessment
- Student-involved record keeping
- Student involved communication (portfolios,
conferences)
36But what about OAT?
- Tests often are so broad in their coverage that
the info is too imprecise for teahers to use - The delay between testing and score reporting is
weeks or months away by the time the scores
return, they no longer reflect the achievement of
the learners - Tests are usually administered once a year while
teachers make instructional changes daily!
37Learning Teams
- Critique your assessments
- Assist in moving the assessment project toward
useful, successful goals - Follow a preplanned agenda that is management and
applicable to your work
38Tools
- Goal setting-
- How to teach the students how to goal set
- Examples of goals
- Collaborative goal setting
- Goal setting plan
- Long term planning
- DATA folders
39Setting/Environment
- Ground rules
- Interviews/introductions
- Capturing expectations
- Issue Bin (Penalty Box)
- Plus/Delta
- Mission/Vision statements
40Tools for what they know
- Brainstorming
- Affinity Diagram
- Evaluation criteria
- Light-voting
- Force-field analysis
41Tools for thinking process
- Flowchart
- Interrelationship diagram
- Fishbone diagram
- Tree diagram
- Action planning
42Tools for gathering data
- Check sheets
- Surveys (surveymonkey.com)
- Pareto chart
- Matrix
- Scatter diagram
- Run chart