Instructional Decision Making - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Instructional Decision Making

Description:

... on appropriate instruction for ALL students ... Core instruction is viable. ... Instruction that is available for students identified as exceeding or not ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: keysto
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Instructional Decision Making


1
Instructional Decision Making
An IDM Process
2
Instructional Decision Making Process
  • Focused on improving students success through
    solutions within the general education
    environment.
  • Is an interactive, ongoing process that includes
    students, parents, educators, caregivers,
    administration, and AEA support staff.

3
IDM
  • Uses data regarding students response to
    instruction to determine future educational needs
    and what educational services are required to
    meet those needs.
  • This process is used for academic and behavioral
    needs.

4
When implemented fully.
IDM IS DESIGNED TO ENABLE ALL STUDENTS TO BE
SUCCESSFUL!
5
Putting the Pieces Together
6
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
7
CSIP Comprehensive School Improvement Planning
Constant Conversation Questions
What do data tell us?
How will we evaluate?
What will we do?
How will we know there is change?
8
Instructional Decision Making
Core
S
I
9
(No Transcript)
10
Alignment of the Various Models Currently
Emphasized in Iowa Education
From the SINA Team at AEA 10, November 03
11
THE IDM PROCESS
12
IDM is a process that provides a common framework
and a standardized communication mechanism for
instructional decision-making. It aligns with
and supports all services and programs within a
school.
  • The IDM process is
  • Student focused
  • Focused on appropriate instruction for ALL
    students
  • Data driven
  • A collaborative effort
  • Proactive
  • A seamless continuum of instructional delivery
  • For all students
  • Fluid, interactive, and responsive

13
IDM pulls it all together
  • Curriculum Analysis
  • Iowa Technical Adequacy Project (ITAP)
  • Surveys of Enacted Curriculum
  • Student Issues
  • Talented and Gifted (NOW Gifted and Talented )
  • English Language Learners
  • At-Risk
  • Migrant
  • MCGF
  • Neglected and Delinquent
  • Special Education
  • Title I

14
IDM pulls it all together
  • Federal Mandates
  • No Child Left Behind
  • Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA)
  • Individuals with Disabilities (IDEA)
  • State Initiatives
  • Comprehensive School Improvement Plan (CSIP)
  • Iowa Professional Development Model (IPDM)
  • Individual Career Development Plan (ICDP)
  • District Career Development Plan (DCDP)
  • Every Student Counts, Every Student Reads, Every
    Learner Inquires

15
Bottom Line.
  • IDM represents educational best practice and
    helps schools evaluate their current available
    resources to meet the instructional and
    behavioral abilities of ALL students.

16
Core Instruction
  • The district adopted comprehensive curriculum
  • Provided for all students
  • Screening and formative evaluations occur

Core Instruction
17
Components of Core Cycle
May be presented to the whole class. May be
delivered through flexible grouping. May be
presented differently to groups according to
needs.
18
Core CycleInstructional Program
  • Core instruction is guaranteed. This means that
    the intended curriculum (standards and
    Benchmarks) is also the implemented curriculum
    (delivered by the teacher).
  • Core instruction is viable. This means that the
    curriculum content for each grade and/or course
    can be adequately addressed in the time
    available.
  • Content considered essential for all students is
    identified and communicated for every grade level
    and course.
  • Essential content is sequenced and organized in
    such a way that students have ample opportunity
    to learn it.

19
Supplemental Cycle
  • Instruction that is available for students
    identified as exceeding or not meeting core-
    learning expectations
  • Provided to smaller groups of students with
    similar needs
  • Research based/evidence based strategies selected
  • Targeted instruction in identified area
  • IN ADDITION TO CORE



Supplemental Instruction
Supplemental Instruction
20
Components of the Supplemental Cycle
  • Focus on the identified student learning needs
  • May involve the use of additional resources
    within the classroom
  • May be changes in, intensity, consistency, and
    immediacy of feedback
  • May include a change in instructional strategy

21
Intensive Cycle
  • Instruction that is available for students
    identified as significantly exceeding or not
    meeting core and/or supplemental learning
    expectations
  • Provided to individuals or small groups of
    students with similar needs
  • Research based/evidence based strategies selected
  • IN ADDITION TO CORE



Supplemental Instruction
Intensive Instruction
Intensive Instruction
22
Components of theIntensive Cycle
Often includes different instructional
strategies Lesson plan prescribed for the
individual Provided to individuals or small
groups of students Often includes other support
(AEA) personnel
23
Assessment Components of
Core Instruction
  • Formative
  • Naturally occurring
  • Authentic
  • Continuous and ongoing
  • Used to examine student performance over time
  • Used to adjust instruction
  • Identifies if students are making progress
  • Screening
  • Given to all
  • Quick and easy to administer
  • Provides immediate data
  • Easy to interpret
  • May be administered more than once
  • Identifies high and low performing students whose
    needs are not being met

24
Assessment Components of Core
Instruction
  • Diagnostic
  • Information gathered from multiple sources
    (comprehensive)
  • Used to inform instruction
  • Helps to determine why the academic and/or
    behavior needs are occurring
  • Identifies what the student needs to learn
  • Summative
  • Measures program attainments
  • Achievement goals
  • Outcome of instruction
  • Provides information on the programs efficacy

25
(No Transcript)
26
Why Grade Level IDM/RtI Teams
  • To engage in collective inquiry into both best
    practice and the current reality regarding
    students existing levels of achievement.
  • To relentlessly examine and question the status
    quo, seek new methods, test those methods, and
    reflect on results.
  • To recognize that the process of searching for
    answers is more important than having an answer.

Taken from Whatever It Takes
27
Narrowing the FOCUS to a Critical Question.
  • What happens in our school when, despite our
    best efforts in the classroom, a student does not
    learn?

28
Moving Ahead
  • IDM/RtI teams will ensure that we are Creating
    a school-wide system of interventions that
    provides all students with additional time and
    support when they experience initial difficulty
    in their learning.
  • Interventions
  • Systematic Response
  • Timely Response
  • Directive

29
I used to ask.
  • Why doesnt somebody do something?
  • Then I realized..
  • I AM SOMEBODY!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com