The Metal Processing Industry in Bosnia and Herzegovina - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

The Metal Processing Industry in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Description:

8/22/09. Wiener Institut f r Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche ... 28.4 Forging, pressing, stamping and roll forming of metal; powder metallurgy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: muck9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Metal Processing Industry in Bosnia and Herzegovina


1
The Metal Processing Industry in Bosnia and
Herzegovina
  • For the OECD Investment Compact project
  • Investment and Trade Liberalisation,
    Strengthening Development and Implementation of
    Investment and Trade Policy in the Western
    Balkans
  • Mario Holzner, Gabor Hunya, Waltraut Urban, Goran
    Nedic

2
Topics
  • Aim of the study
  • Sector profile
  • FDI and the metal processing industry
  • FDI survey
  • Conclusions

3
Aim of the study
  • To analyse the impact of FDI in the BiH metal
    processing industry
  • To demonstrate what can be done with officially
    published data and what not

4
Defining the sector
  • 27 Manufacture of basic metals
  • 27.1 Manufacture of basic iron and steel and of
    ferro-alloys (ECSC)
  • 27.2 Manufacture of tubes
  • 27.3 Other first processing of iron and steel and
    production of non ECSC ferro-alloys
  • 27.4 Manufacture of basic precious and
    non-ferrous metals
  • 27.5 Casting of metals
  • 28 Manufacture of fabricated metal products,
    except machinery and equipment
  • 28.4 Forging, pressing, stamping and roll forming
    of metal powder metallurgy
  • 28.5 Treatment and coating of metals general
    mechanical engineering

5
Analysis Relative size, 2003
6
Analysis Production structure, 2004
7
Analysis Production, 1989 2004
8
Analysis Production indices
Missing 2digit unified BiH data
9
Analysis Employment
Missing 2digit RS BiH data
10
Analysis Monthly gross wages, EUR
Missing 2digit RS BiH data
11
Analysis Trade
12
Analysis Trading partners, 2004(SITC 67 68,
Iron, Steel and Non-ferrous metals)
13
Analysis RCA, 2005
1
2
3
14
Missing data
  • BiH state level most 2digit data missing
  • Output and gross value added
  • Employment
  • Firm number and structure
  • Investment
  • Electric energy prices by type of customer
  • Material input costs (no Input-Output table)

15
FDI Stock 2005, CBBH
Officially published 2digit data missing
16
FDI Stock in metal processing industry, EUR mn,
2005, CBBH
13
17
FDI Stock, MOFTER
2digit data missing
18
FDI MOFTER list, 2005
48 of D, 28 of total
19
Survey Corrected MOFTER list,book value, 2005
71 of the original figure
20
Survey Employment in comparison
2004 only Mittal Steel (4500) Aluminiji (924)
declared more employees than FBiH NACE 27
21
Survey Production in comparison
NACE 27 FDI companies declare higher production
than total official NACE 27 sector
22
Survey Questionnaires(9 out of presumed 12 FDI
companies)
  • Origin of foreign investment
  • Most FIEs from Ex-YU (SLO, HR, SiCG)
  • For them BiH subsidiary is more important than in
    other CEE/SEE
  • Only 1 important multinational company (Mittal)
  • Privatisation
  • Only 2 green field investments, others privatised
  • No restructuring before privatisation
  • Low selling prices (also because of arrears)
  • Most important case steelwork Zenica (first
    KCIC, then Mittal)
  • Other important cases Aluminij Mostar (12 TLM
    from Croatia) Alumina plant Birac Zvornik (64
    Ukio Bank from Lithuania)

23
Survey Questionnaires (cont.1)
  • Motivations of foreign investment
  • Mostly low cost of production and cheap sourcing
    of inputs
  • Also Export base for third countries
  • Only 3 FIEs main motive to access BiH market
  • Underhand in BiH still not necessary to meet all
    ecological standards
  • Impact of FDI
  • For 50 investment was a success, for others too
    early to say
  • Production and revenues significantly increased
    after foreign entry
  • E.g. Mittal Steel produced 2004 170,000 t,
    2005 350,000 t
  • E.g. Birac Zvornik produced 2004 370,000 t,
    2005 550,000 t

24
Survey Export revenues
25
Survey Profits
26
Survey Questionnaires (cont.2)
  • Problems of FIEs
  • Bureaucracy as No.1 problem
  • Simplifying customs procedures and exemption for
    raw materials, machinery, equipment beneficial
  • Another important problem Bad infrastructure
  • E.g. Mittal receives only 55 MWh instead of
    needed 72 MWh, bottleneck railway and port
    infrastructure
  • International linkages (unweighted averages)
  • Third of inputs local, 10 HR SiCG, 56 other
    European
  • 18 local buyers, 19 HR SiCG, 53 other
    European

27
BiH supply linksof Aluminij Mostarin 2005, in
of total supply from BiH (53 of grand total)
Survey Local linkages 1
28
BiH markets of Aluminij Mostarin 2005, in of
total BiH sales(14 of grand total)
Survey Local linkages 2
29
Survey Questionnaires (cont.3)
  • Development prospects
  • All FIEs plan to increase output and employment
  • E.g. Mittal plans to invest EUR 120 mn for
    integrated production of steel tripling output to
    2 mn t in 2009, 800 employees
  • Two of the biggest even plan to build a
    cross-border cluster
  • Additional FDI on coat tails of sectors big
    companies expected
  • E.g. Mittal plans to outsource refractory,
    maintenance, workshop for spare parts Future
    need for limestone, transport, engineering
  • General prospects for the sector are favourable
  • However world market price for steel and
    aluminium determining

30
Conclusions
  • Analysis impediment missing 2digit state level
    officially published data
  • No input cost data (I-O table missing)
  • Official data seems partly inconsistent

31
Conclusions (cont.1)
  • Successful foreign entry through privatisation
    (increase in production, revenue, exports)
  • FDI was essential for restructuring
    reconstruction
  • Strategic investors more successful than
    financial
  • Since 2004 FDI acceleration (due to Mittal
    entry, change in privatisation method)

32
Conclusions (cont.2)
  • Majority of FIEs from Ex-YU, capital from outside
    region
  • Local linkages could be expanded
  • Problems Bureaucracy and Bad infrastructure
  • Sectors sub-branches with higher value added
    have a negative Revealed Comparative Advantage

33
Conclusions (cont.3)
  • Rather favourable prospects
  • Development of world market prices is
    determinant
  • Development of local and regional market
    dependent on further reconstruction and
    infrastructure investment (car industry?)

34
Policy conclusions
  • Improvement of national statistics
  • Disaggregation
  • BiH state level data
  • BiH coordination of economic policy across
    entities
  • Infrastructure investment (electricity, rail,
    road, port)
  • More green-field more incentives for local
    spin-offs
  • Look for possible domestic and foreign suppliers
    for the big integration companies (e.g. supplier
    fares)

35
www.wiiw.ac.at/balkan/
  • reports
  • data
  • announcements
  • mailing list
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com