A Cool Party Trick - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

A Cool Party Trick

Description:

Schroedinger notation is usually called 'position representation' ... A Faux Proof. Take the difference between these two. Now we need to recognize that ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: phillip62
Learn more at: http://physics.wku.edu
Category:
Tags: cool | faux | party | trick

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Cool Party Trick


1
A Cool Party Trick
2
Fundamentals of Schroedinger Notation
  • Schroedinger notation is usually called position
    representation
  • However, Schroedinger notation can easily be
    transformed (as we will see) into momentum
    representation
  • If agt represents a state, and xgt represents the
    unit vector in the x-direction then

3
  • In Hamiltons formulation, the equations of
    motion were functions of r and p (or x and px)
  • So we see that the momentum representation may be
    useful

4
Recall
  • ?kp
  • Now rather than putting vector symbols
    everywhere, I am going to jump to 1-dimension so
    let ?kx px
  • I will let the wavefunction in momentum space be
    represented by f(kx)

5
Obviously
6
Postulate 11
  • The Fourier transform (FT) converts functions
    from position representation to momentum
    representation of the conjugate momenta
  • This means that FT(f(x))f(kx), FT(f(y))f(ky),
    etc. and vice-versa

7
Recall
8
A Mystery Solved
  • Lets Review
  • Weve seen new formulations of classical
    mechanics, in particular, Hf(x,p)
  • Weve seen evidence that energy is quantized and
    learned that we cannot necessarily measure x and
    p simultaneously

9
A Mystery Solved
  • We learned that massless particles only have
    momentum which is related to the wavelength
  • Wavenumber is somehow related to the energy of
    the system
  • Therefore

10
We make a choice
  • Since we dont know if velocity is a particularly
    relevant number (i.e. massless particles) but we
    do know that wavelength (related to p) is very
    relevant and so we must choose to use
    Hamiltonians formulation of mechanics!
  • (But what about
    uncertainty? i.e. that x and p cannot be
    measured simultaneously?)

11
Fourier Transform again
  • Weve just learned that I can switch between
    position representations and momentum
    representations using the Fourier transform

12
From Schaums Math Handbook
13
So
14
An important result
This, then, represents momentum in POSITION
representation!
This is px, the momentum in momentum
representation
15
After all these years
16
What about px2?
17
What about the Hamiltonian?
The Hamiltonian in position representation (and
the left hand side of the Schroedinger Equation!)
18
And Now for Something Completely Different
  • (Not a Scotsman on a horse!)

19
Maxwells Equations
20
Now lets assume just a wave propagating through
space rs0
A wave equation i.e. any function that fits
this differential equation is a wave traveling
through space
Speed of propagation i.e c
21
Let the wavefunction wave!
22
Separating Stuff
23
So we have
24
We need Bohr and de Broglie
  • We know from Bohr that
  • mvrh/2p
  • And de Broglie says that 2prl or rl/2p
  • So mvl/2ph/2p
  • l h/mv
  • Mechanical energy is conserved under Bohr model
    so
  • TV a constant E

25
Just a little more here
  • Thus, E-VT ½ mv2
  • And from this, 2m(E-V)m2v2
  • mv (2m(E-V))1/2
  • Thus

26
So we have
27
Finally
28
Recall Ehf
29
And what about H?
30
The Time Dependent Schroedinger Equation
TDSE
31
In 3 dimensions
32
Postulate 12
  • The probability density, r, is defined as
    absolute square of the wavefunction

33
In momentum representation
34
Probability current density
  • r probability in time and space
  • J measure of the flow of probability from one
    place to another probability current density

35
Postulate 13
  • The probability current density, J, is defined as

36
Huh?
  • In EM, JI/A and has units of C/m2/s or
    (C/m3)(m/s) which means rv
  • Where rcharge density
  • vaverage velocity of charges

37
Before we go on, we have to define the
expectation value of velocity
38
A Faux Proof
Take the difference between these two
39
Now we need to recognize that
40
From EM, the Continuity Equation
  • The decrease of charge in a small volume must
    correspond to the flow of charge out through the
    surface (conservation of electric charge)
  • Hey, wait a minute!

41
Continuity Equation for Probability
  • In this case, the decrease of the probability in
    one volume must be equal to the flow of
    probability out from the surface
  • Conservation of Probability!

42
Another EM Analogy
43
Time just keeps on slippin
44
Back to TDSE
45
The other side
  • E is the eigenvalue of H, the energy of the
    system.
  • y(r) is said to describe a stationary state
  • This function c(t) is just a phase factor for
    Y(r,t) and does not contribute to the physics of
    the system. (unless you need to superimpose two
    different wavefunctions and then it is only the
    relative phase (w-w)t which matters)

46
Transitions between 2 states
  • In the last section, the unwritten assumption is
    that QM states are permanent that is, a system
    in a given state will always remain in that
    state.
  • We know this cannot be true radioactivity, among
    other phenomena, gives lie to this argument

47
Problems with our brand new toy
  • The Schroedinger Equation has two major problems
  • Not relativistic (see Dirac Equation)
  • Only describes systems which do not change!
    QFTQuantum Field Theory covers this area

48
Postulate 14
  • An initial state igt can make a transition to a
    final state fgt by the emission or absorption of
    a quanta.
  • The probability of this occurrence is
    proportional to
  • ltfViigt2
  • where Vi is the interaction potential appropriate
    to the potential.
  • This is only an approximation. Further
    approximations may be necessary
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com