City emissions: Similarities and Differences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

City emissions: Similarities and Differences

Description:

g.maffeis_at_terraria.com. Terraria srl. Milan Italy. P.Thunis, K. Cuvelier ... Five City Delta cities: MILAN, PARIS, BERLIN, PRAGUE and LONDON both local (city) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: maff
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: City emissions: Similarities and Differences


1
  • City emissions Similarities and Differences
  • Ispra 14-15 October
  • G.Maffeis, M.G. Longoni, E. Bossi
  • g.maffeis_at_terraria.com
  • Terraria srl. Milan Italy
  • P.Thunis, K. Cuvelier
  • IES-JRC Ispra Italy

2
Five cities
  • Five City Delta cities MILAN, PARIS, BERLIN,
    PRAGUE and LONDON both local (city) and national
    (EMEP) emission inventories have been compared
    and analyzed.
  • A special acknowledg-ment is due to all city and
    EMEP emission inventory manager.

3
LOCAL INVENTORY DOMAIN NOx traffic emissions
Total domains
4
Five cities inventorygeneral information
5
Five cities inventorytemporalchemical
disaggreation
6
Five cities inventorytemporal profiles
MILAN source sector 2
LONDON source sector 2
7
Five cities inventoryLondon vs Milan VOC
profiles
8
City Delta Emission DensitiesCity vs EMEP
inventory (I)
BERLIN
PARIS
9
City Delta Emission DensitiesCity vs EMEP
inventory (II)
MILAN
PRAGUE
10
City Delta Emission DensitiesCity vs EMEP
inventory (III)
LONDON
11
Local vs regional inventory percent difference
on total domain
12
Five cities emission densities differences
13
City centre emission densities / total domain
emission densities
14
Pro capita emissionsthe Milan case
15
Emission ratios function of city centre distance
(I)
NOxgtVOC
VOCgtNOx
City centre
transept
16
Emission ratios function of city centre distance
(II)
17
Emission ratios function of city centre distance
(III)
NOx traffic 60-80
PM traffic 60-80 to 50
18
2010 emission scenarios
  • Emission data (both local and EMEP) have been
    projected in 2010 for two scenarios the CLE
    (Current LEgislation) and the MFR (Most Feasible
    Reduction) emission reduction scenarios.

Percent reductions
19
City 2010 emission scenarios NOx
20
City 2010 emission scenarios PM
21
Conclusions
  • A first set of rough QA/QC emissions indicators
    (e.g. emission density, pro capita emission,
    emission ratios ..) could help in a first check
    of emission inventories. This evidence some
    difference to be checked for the local
    inventories.
  • While NOx, CO, SOx emission estimates seems to be
    quite robust with an uncertainty roughly thought
    to be around 20-30, PM one seems to be still
    higher than 50, probably due to sector lack.
    This higher uncertainty could confound scenarios
    efficacy.
  • The check of the red points evidenced in local
    inventory could assure an acceptable QA/QC on
    emission input. Major focus should be given to
    temporal and VOC disaggregation that could
    strongly influence peak emissions and
    consequently air quality excendances.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com