Title: Uses and Misuses of Required Economic Capital
1Uses and Misuses of Required Economic Capital
Brian Dvorak Managing Director Moodys
KMV brian.dvorak_at_mkmv.com
2Introduction Regulatory Capital vs. Economic
Capital
- Banks must regularly calculate regulatory capital
requirements and ensure that adequate capital is
available to meet these requirements - Regulatory capital is an accounting concept it
does not correspond with economic capital - Major banks have transitioned away from using
required regulatory capital toward required
economic capital as the basis for making a wide
variety of decisions - Required economic capital has emerged as the
language of risk at major banks
3- What Is Required Economic Capital?
- How Do Banks Use Measures of Required Economic
Capital? - How Do Banks Misuse Measures of Required Economic
Capital?
4- What Is Required Economic Capital?
5Expected Loss, Unexpected Loss, and Tail Risk
Portfolio 1
Portfolio 2
6Portfolio Loss Distribution
Probability
EL
Loss
7Portfolio Required Economic Capital
Probability
- The level of economic capital implies a
probability of capital exhaustion and an
associated debt rating - Given the portfolio loss distribution and a
target debt rating, the required economic capital
may be inferred
Aa
Aaa
A
Economic Capital
CA
CAa
CAaa
8- How Do Banks Use Measures of Required Economic
Capital?
9Banks Use Required Economic Capital for Many
Purposes
- Capital Adequacy Assessment
- External Reporting
- Strategic Planning
- Capital Budgeting
- Risk and Performance Measurement
- Limit Setting
- Risk-Based Pricing
- Customer Profitability Analysis
10Economic Capital Adequacy
- Banks often compare economic capital requirements
with available capital to gauge whether the
degree of leverage is appropriate for the amount
of risk undertaken and the institutions desired
credit quality - This comparison is often provided to
- Regulators
- Rating agencies
- Investors
- although these parties may not have a good
understanding of the measure
11Balancing Portfolio Risk, Economic Capital,
Leverage and Credit Quality
12Strategic Planning and Capital Budgeting
- Required economic capital is used for strategic
planning and capital budgeting - Strategic scenario analysis
- Capital allocation among business lines
- Business line growth and performance targets
- Acquisition/divestiture analysis
13Measuring Risk and Business Line Performance
- Required economic capital is used to measure
portfolio risk and the risk-adjusted performance
of business lines - Business lines are usually charged for economic
capital use using a CAPM approach - This performance may be an important component of
management incentive compensation - This creates challenges when the economic capital
model or parameters change
14Credit Limits, Risk-Based Pricing and Customer
Profitability
- Dynamic, required economic capital based guidance
limits supplement hard notional counterparty
limits - Such limits can help ensure that exposure
reduction occurs if credit quality deteriorates - Required economic capital is used for risk-based
pricing at many banks the price includes the
cost of the economic capital required - The cost of required economic capital is also
used in customer profitability calculations
15- How Do Banks Misuse Measures of Required Economic
Capital?
16Five Ways Banks Sometimes Misuse Required
Economic Capital Measures
- Comparison of required economic capital with
available book capital - Inaccurate aggregation across portfolios and risk
types - Inappropriate measurement and use of
through-the-cycle required economic capital - Allocation of required economic capital
inconsistently with managements goals - Inappropriate pricing methods based on required
economic capital
17Five Ways Banks Sometimes Misuse Required
Economic Capital Measures
- Comparison of required economic capital with
available book capital - Inaccurate aggregation across portfolios and risk
types - Inappropriate measurement and use of
through-the-cycle required economic capital - Allocation of required economic capital
inconsistently with managements goals - Inappropriate pricing methods based on required
economic capital
18Book vs. Market-Based Economic Capital Adequacy
- Most banks compare economic capital requirements
for their loan portfolios with book measures of
capital available - Required economic capital does not correspond
with book capital, except perhaps at the margin - Ideally, banks should compare required economic
capital with market-based measures of available
capital - This would require, as a first step, calculating
the market value of the loan portfolio, including
hedges - Banks are increasingly marking at least some
segments of their loan portfolios to
market/model, although challenges remain for
retail, commercial real estate and structured
finance loans
19Five Ways Banks Sometimes Misuse Required
Economic Capital Measures
- Comparison of required economic capital with
available book capital - Inaccurate aggregation across portfolios and risk
types - Inappropriate measurement and use of
through-the-cycle required economic capital - Allocation of required economic capital
inconsistently with managements goals - Inappropriate pricing methods based on required
economic capital
20Aggregation Across Portfolios and Risk Types
- For more accurate risk and performance
measurement, risk-based pricing and portfolio
improvement decision-making, many banks attempt
to aggregate measures of required economic
capital across portfolios and risk types - Failure to do this aggregation accurately can
lead to poor portfolio decisions - The question is what is the best way to perform
these aggregations
21Aggregation Across Portfolios
- Some adopt a silo approach, where required
economic capital is calculated separately for
different portfolios, often with inconsistent
models, then combined - Cross-portfolio correlation may be very difficult
to estimate because models may not be consistent
and/or requisite data may not exist - Alternatively, other banks adopt a broad
perspective on the portfolio, combining different
portfolios together in one model - This holistic approach tends to produce more
consistent measurement of aggregate required
economic capital - Most clients consider the model risk of the
holistic approach to be lower than the silo
approach
22Aggregation Across Risk Types
- Aggregation across risk types may be more
important in terms of diversification than
aggregation across portfolios, but may be more
difficult to measure well - Very few banks attempt to measure all risk types
in one consistent model - In addition, many banks do not have good data for
estimating correlation across risk types - While required economic capital across risk types
may not be measured well, this only creates
problems if these aggregated measures of required
economic capital are used for making important
decisions
23Five Ways Banks Sometimes Misuse Required
Economic Capital Measures
- Comparison of required economic capital with
available book capital - Inaccurate aggregation across portfolios and risk
types - Inappropriate measurement and use of
through-the-cycle required economic capital - Allocation of required economic capital
inconsistently with managements goals - Inappropriate pricing methods based on required
economic capital
24Required Economic Capital Through the Cycle
- Many banks consider required economic capital to
be a through-the-cycle (TTC) measure - Some think it should be
- Some think it is, because key model inputs, such
as PDs, are TTC measures - This perspective may be mistaken, as all model
parameters and the model itself must be
calibrated TTC to produce an accurate TTC measure
of required economic capital
25Required Economic Capital Through the Cycle
- Are TTC required economic capital measures
desirable? - Both risk and expected return vary considerably
TTC - TTC risk measures bear little relationship to
market prices of risky assets - Many banks recognise that stabilised, TTC
measures of required economic capital create
wrong signals for portfolio management and
pricing purposes
26Five Ways Banks Sometimes Misuse Required
Economic Capital Measures
- Comparison of required economic capital with
available book capital - Inaccurate aggregation across portfolios and risk
types - Inappropriate measurement and use of
through-the-cycle required economic capital - Allocation of required economic capital
inconsistently with managements goals - Inappropriate pricing methods based on required
economic capital
27Economic Capital Allocation Contribution to
Risk or Tail Risk
For allocating required economic capital, a
growing number of banks have moved away from Risk
Contribution toward Tail Risk Contribution, but
often measured with a large tail
Risk Contribution is an exposures marginal
contribution to the portfolios Unexpected Loss
(standard deviation of losses)
Tail Risk Contribution is an exposures marginal
contribution to a defined region of the portfolio
loss distribution
28Aligning Economic Capital Allocation with
Management Goals
- For allocating marginal required economic capital
of an exposure, neither Risk Contribution nor
Tail Risk Contribution are wrong, unless they do
not correspond with managements goals - What are managements goals?
- Managing earnings or loss volatility?
- Managing the risk of extreme losses?
- Managing the risk of some less-extreme loss
amount?
29Five Ways Banks Sometimes Misuse Required
Economic Capital Measures
- Comparison of required economic capital with
available book capital - Inaccurate aggregation across portfolios and risk
types - Inappropriate measurement and use of
through-the-cycle required economic capital - Allocation of required economic capital
inconsistently with managements goals - Inappropriate pricing methods based on required
economic capital
30Using Required Economic Capital for Pricing
- Early efforts at risk-based pricing of loans
attempted to set a hurdle rate of return based on
the incremental costs of the loan plus a target
profit margin - Incremental costs typically included
- direct costs of origination
- costs of funding (borrowed funds plus incremental
capital) - taxes
- overhead
- Often called a RAROC model, many banks still
use this approach to price new loans, but there
are often problems in the way these models have
been implemented
31Common Problems with RAROC Models
- Only marginal costs should be used for marginal
pricing decisions, yet RAROC model costs may not
reflect true marginal costs - Average costs (e.g., cost of borrowed funds,
variable overhead) may be used - Allocations of fixed costs are common
- Costs often are based on measures that do not
reflect the true economics, especially for
capital and profitability - Required economic capital may not be based on a
calculation that reflects the true portfolio
risk, e.g., applying a standard capital
multiplier to a standalone calculation of loan
risk - Costs may be allocated to accounting concepts of
capital, such as regulatory capital - Profitability targets may not be consistent
across the bank and may not reflect true economic
value creation/destruction
32Defining the Target Return
- An alternative to setting the target return
according to a RAROC model is to set it based on
the return/risk ratio of a comparable benchmark
portfolio - Unfortunately, there are no industry-standard
benchmark portfolios for loan portfolios - Using the existing return/risk ratio of the loan
portfolio to define the target return is not
necessarily the most efficient way to proceed,
but at least it provides useful guidance that
will enable the bank to create an optimal
portfolio gradually - Every action should improve the return/risk ratio
or it should not be undertaken
33Summary
- Required economic capital has become the language
of risk at many banks - It is used for many more applications than simply
capital adequacy - Sometimes banks mis-measure or misuse measures of
required economic capital - Many of these problems may be solved now, and
others through more and better research