Week Two Organisation Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Week Two Organisation Design

Description:

Structures exist to coordinate the activities of different individuals ... The adhocracy' Missionary organisations. Mintzberg' s organisational configurations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: loca183
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Week Two Organisation Design


1
Week Two - Organisation Design
  • Structural configurations
  • The formal hierarchy
  • Multi-focused hierarchies
  • Mechanistic and organic structures

2
Mintzberg' s organisational configurations
  • Mintzberg argues that
  • Structures exist to coordinate the activities of
    different individuals and work processes.
  • The nature of the co-ordination changes with the
    increasing size of the organisation.

3
Mintzberg' s organisational configurations
  • Mintzberg' s idea
  • the building blocks and co-coordinating
    mechanisms required for any organisation are as
    follows
  • Strategic apex
  • Techno-structure
  • Operating core
  • Middle line
  • Support staff

4
Mintzberg' s organisational configurations
5
Mintzberg' s organisational configurations
  • The importance and relative size and mix of the
    building blocks will vary depending on the
    organisation
  • Mintzberg discusses 6 organisational
    configurations all covering
  • The environment
  • Type of work
  • Complexity of tasks facing the organisation

6
Mintzberg' s organisational configurations
  • Simple Structure
  • Machine bureaucracy
  • Professional bureaucracy
  • Divisional form
  • The adhocracy
  • Missionary organisations

7
A Mass Production Process
8
The formal hierarchy
  • Basic structural forms include
  • Small business structure
  • Functional structure
  • Product and geographical structure
  • Divisional structure

9
Small business structure
  • Also known as the entrepreneurial structure
  • Key advantage is simplicity
  • Owner/manager can adjust employee tasks to the
    latest opportunity
  • Owner/manager responsible for strategic and
    operational management
  • Self-contained
  • Self-controlled business unit

10
Functional structure
  • Functional usually the next stage in the business
    unit development
  • Strategic objectives decided at board level
  • Planning is divided between
  • Corporate level
  • Functional level

11
Functional structure
12
Product Geographical structure
  • As the number of products or geographic regions
    grow functional design may not be appropriate
  • Product orientation is used
  • Main functions are apportioned to relative
    products
  • With each product group specialised personnel
    will be attached.

13
Advantages of product divisionalisation
  • Focus on product performance profitability
  • Encourages growth and diversity
  • The role of general manager encouraged.
  • Product is generally preferred over geographic
    due to complexity.

14
Possible Road Transport Enterprise
15
Divisional Structure
  • When a functionally structured organisation grows
    by diversification
  • Product structure is inappropriate
  • Hence a divisional structure
  • Strategic Business Unit (SBU)

16
Divisional Structure
17
Divisional Structure
  • Difficulties here
  • Corporate strategy becomes complex
  • Increased divisional planning
  • More operational planning at functional level

18
Holding (group) structure
  • Radical form of divisionalisation
  • Subsidiaries are legal entities
  • Advantages
  • A reduced central overhead
  • Spreading of risk
  • Easy to divest of subsidiaries.

19
Matrix Structure
  • New complex structures
  • Attention given to creation of
  • Groupings
  • Project teams
  • Members of staff from different departments or
    sections assigned to the team for the duration of
    the project.

20
Matrix Structure
  • The matrix structure
  • Where two or more significant criteria for
    success exist
  • Management of each criteria are equally important
  • Managers have equal weight
  • The objective is to capitalise of the areas of
    expertise which can be stifled by the normal
    hierarchy.

21
Matrix Structure
  • Adv
  • Retains functional economies and product
    co-ordination
  • Open communications and flexible goals
  • Improved motivation
  • People working in teams
  • Specialists broadening outlook
  • Encourages competition within the organisation

22
Matrix Structure
  • Disadvantages
  • Higher administrative costs
  • Conflict between functional and product managers
  • Threat to occupational activity
  • Reporting to more than one superior
  • Expectations not as clear i.e. everything is
    important, pay equal attention to everything!!

23
Organic and mechanistic structures
  • Burns Stalker (1961)
  • Distinguished between organic and mechanistic
    structures
  • The beginning of administrative wisdom is the
    awareness that there is no one best way of
    designing a management system
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com