Title: EART 160: Planetary Science
1EART 160 Planetary Science
MESSENGER Flyby of Mercury This hemisphere never
before seen!
2Last Time
- Celestial Mechanics
- Newton Proves Keplers Laws
- Conservation of Momentum, Angular Momentum,
Energy - Collisions, Gravitational Slingshot
- Solar System Formation
- Nebular Theory
- Jeans Collapse
3Today
- Solar System Formation
- Runaway and Oligarchic Growth
- Distribution of solar system materials
- Planetary composition, structure
- Late-stage accretion
- Formation of the Moon
- Planetary Migration
- Late Heavy Bombardment
- Extrasolar Planets Hot Jupiters
4Jeans Collapse
- A perturbation will cause the density to increase
locally - Runaway Process
- Increased density ? increased gravity ? more
material gets sucked in
Gravitational potential energy
M,r
Thermal energy
R
Equating these two and using MrR3 we get
Does this make sense?
Mmass rdensity Rradius kBoltzmanns
constant Ttemperature (K) Nno. of atoms
matomic weight MHmass of H atom
5Proplyds in the Orion Nebula
Disks radiate in the infrared All very young few
My
Beta Pictoris 50 ly
Bipolar Outflow
HH-30 in Taurus
HST Images Courtesy NASA/ESA/STSci
6Minimum Mass Solar Nebula
Density drops off with distance. COINCIDENCE?!?!?
!
- We can use the present-day observed planetary
masses and compositions to reconstruct how much
mass was there initially
7Timeline of Planetary Growth
- 1. Nebular disk formation
- 2. Initial coagulation (10km, 104 yrs)
- 3. Runaway growth (to Moon size, 105 yrs)
- 4. Oligarchic growth, gas loss(to Mars size,
106 yrs) - 5. Late-stage collisions (107-8 yrs)
8Collisional Accretion (104 y)
Inelastic Collisions between dust grains
Dust grains also accrete onto chondrules
solidified molten fragments
Forms Planetesimals R lt few km
Vertical Motions canceled out Disk orientation
controlled by angular momentum Disks gravity
also draws material toward midplane
9Runaway Growth (105 y)
- Slow-moving planetesimals accrete
- Protoplanets grow to size of moon (3500 km)
Fg GMm / R2
vorbital lt vesc
vorbital gt vesc
The rich get richer! -- Bender
10Oligarchic Growth (105 y)
- Cosmic Feudal System
- Only a few dozen big guys left (oligarchs)
- And a lot of very small stuff (serfs?)
- Oligarchs sweep up everything in their feeding
zones - Gas drag slows large objects down, circularizes
orbits - Brightening sun clears away nebular gas.
11Composition
- Solar Nebula
- 98.4 gas (H, He)
- 1.1 ices (e.g. H2O, NH3, CH4)
- 0.4 rock (e.g. MgSiO4)
- 0.1 metal (mostly Fe, Ni)
- How do we know this?
- Look at the Sun!
- Absorpiton lines indicate elements
- Discovery of He
Volatile
Refractory
Image courtesy N.A.Sharp, NOAO/NSO/Kitt Peak
FTS/AURA/NSF
12Condensation in the Nebula
Metals and Rocks Ices 1600 K 180 K
The Frost Line
13Terrestrial v. Jovian
- Only refractories in inner SS
- Planets can only grow to Earth-size
- Too small to hold onto gas
- Ices also available beyond frost line
- Much more material
- Ice-rock planets up to 20 M? possible
- Big enough to accrete H, He ? can get huge, 300
M? - Why no giant planets farther out than Neptune?
14Final Compositions
Io
Ganymede
- Terrestrial Planets
- Iron Core (Red), Silicate Mantle (Grey)
- Mercury has v. thin mantle. Why?
- Very few volatiles, thin atmospheres?
- Jovian Planets
- Rock (Grey) and Ice (Blue Cores)
- Gas envelope (Red, Yellow)
- Jupiter and Saturn mostly H, He
- Uranus, Neptune mostly ice
Guillot, Physics Today, (2004).
15Satellites
- Satellites formed from mini-accretion disks about
giant planets - Explains why they all orbit the same way and in
the same plane - Irregular satellites (including Marss moons)
captured later (high e, i) - What about our own freakishly large Moon?
16Problems with this
- Why exactly four terrestrial planets?
- Numerical models cant do this.
- What is up with the Moon?
- Gas Loss Timing
- As star heats up, gas in disk is blown away
- Gas causes planets to spiral in
- Gas must stick around long enough to form giant
planets - Why are Uranus and Neptune so shrimpy?
- Why are extrasolar planets so close in?
- Alan Boss
- Rapid giant planet formation by disk instability
(100s of years) - Planets tend to spiral into Sun
- Hard to explain heavy elements abundances
- Migration
17Late-stage accretion (107-108 y)
- Oligarchic growth results in dozens of
planetesimals - Oligarchy is unstable!
- Perturb each other until orbits cross
- Giant Impacts
- Large basins on all planetary bodies
- Retrograde rotation of Venus
- Obliquity of Uranus
- Formation of the Earths Moon
18Jupiter The Cosmic Bully
- Its huge! Perturbs anything nearby
- Disrupted accretion at 2-3 AU
- No planet here where we expected one.
- Location of the asteroid belt
- Ejected icy planetesimals
- Gravitational slingshot effect
- Scattered in all directions ? The Oort Cloud
19The Nebular Theory Explains
- All planets orbits in a single plane.
- Suns rotation in same plane.
- Prograde orbits of all planets
- Planetary orbits nearly circular
- Angular momentum distribution
- Some meteorites contain unique inclusions
- Correlation of planetary composition with solar
distance.
- Meteorites different from terrestrial and lunar
rocks - Spacing of the planets
- Giant impacts on all planetary bodies
- Prograde rotation, low obliquity of most planets
- Similar rotation periods for many planets
- Spherical distribution of comets
- Satellite systems of giant planets
20Formation of the Moon
- Co-accretion (sibling)
- ? and ? formed together from Solar Nebula
- Capture (spouse)
- ? made a close pass to ?, captured into orbit
- Fission (child)
- Fast-spinning ?, a blob tore away
- Apollo mission to determine which one is real.
21None of Them!
- ? similar to ?s mantle. Depleted in Fe,
siderophiles, volatiles. - Cannot form from same assemblage
- O, Si-isotopes in ? and ? rocks IDENTICAL.
- Meteorites all different
- Implies common origin of the silicates.
- Angular Momentum of ? - ? too small for fission.
- ?-orbit not in equatorial plane.
- Implies different trajectories
22Requirements
- Explain Angular Momentum of System
- Explain Metal depletion of Moon
- Initially different orbits
- Silicates mixed
- Earths core untouched
- ? Giant Impact!
- Parasite-host relationship?
- Genetic Engineering Experiment?
- Other bad relationship analogy?
23Giant Impact Hypothesis
Mars-sized Planetesimal
Proto-Earth
Asphaug et al., 2001
24- Oblique impact, rotation increases
- 5 hour day!
- Impactor destroyed, Mantle stripped away
- Cores merge, silicates form accretion disk
- Some silicates fall back onto planet
- Rest forms the Moon
- At 12 R?
Canup and Asphaug, 2001
25Migration
- Do planets have to stay where they formed?
- Why are Uranus and Neptune so small?
- Extrasolar gas giants have TIGHT orbits!
- Hot, hot, hot! WAY inside frost line
Cheese it!
Um, guys?
!
Bwa ha ha!
26Gas Giant Formation
- Beyond frost line, planets accrete rock AND ice
- Grow to 10-15 M?
- Accrete Gas
- Uranus and Neptune have little gas
- Failed cores
- BUT nebula too sparse that far out to even get
cores! - Standard formation model doesnt work!
27- Four 15 M? cores between 4 and 10 AU.
- Jupiter forms where nebula is the densest, gets
big. - All three other cores scatter off Jupiter, flung
outward - Saturn still close enough to accrete a bunch of
gas. - What happens to Joop?
Conservation of Angular Momentum!
Thommes et al., 1999
28Hot Jupiters
- Less than 0.05 AU from star
- Problems with forming in situ
- Not enough material
- No ice, gas at all!
- Atmosphere gets stripped away?
HD209458b
Image Courtesy ESA/ Alfred Vidal-Madjar / NASA
29Inward Migration
- Type I Dynamical Friction
- Small Planets drive spiral density waves in disk
- Outer wave imparts torque, planet loses L.
- Moves inward.
- Type II Coevolution
- Growing planet clears a gap in the disk
- Relay station for L-transport
- Moves L outward, planet and gap move inward
30Movie courtesy Phil Armitage http//jilawww.colora
do.edu/pja/planet_migration.html
31Consequences
- Hot Jupiters probably were Regular Jupiters that
got Type II Migration - Giant moves in
- What does Conservation of Angular Momentum say?
- Terrestrial Planets move out. Wayyyy out!
- Why did we escape this fate?
- Atmosphere stripped off by solar wind?
- Chthonian planet?
32Next Time
- Paper Discussions
- Asphaug et al. (2006)
- Thommes et al. (1999)
- Meteorites
- Asteroids
- The Late Heavy Bombardment
- You should now have everything you need to
complete the homework. Really. I mean it this
time.
33(No Transcript)