EMU A European Multilingual Text Prediction Software - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

EMU A European Multilingual Text Prediction Software

Description:

Collocation based prediction. Compound prediction. Some problems of the Final FASTY Prototype ... No Collocation based prediction (only 0,2% KSR gain) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: ChB76
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EMU A European Multilingual Text Prediction Software


1
EMU A European Multilingual Text Prediction
Software
C. Beck, G. Seisenbacher, G. Edelmayer, W.L.
Zagler
Presenter
Research Group on Rehabilitation
Technology Institute integrated
study Technische Universität Wien Favoritenstraße
11/029, A-1040 Wien, Austria
2
Introduction
  • Typing important for
  • Written communication (letters, reports, etc.)
  • Spoken communication (Text-to-speech synthesizer)
  • Using Information Technology (E-mail, internet,
    etc.)
  • Pre-EMU situation
  • Many products for the English speaking market
  • Products for other languages
  • often derivate from English products
  • not designed for highly inflecting languages

3
The Project FASTY
  • Baseline of further Development
  • Type EC co-funded RD project IST-2000-25420
  • Duration January 2001 to March 2004
  • Goal System for increasing the text generation
    rate of disabled persons
  • Special pressure sensitive input devices
  • Generic prediction engine
  • Integrated Userinterface for all modules

4
The UI Features of the Final FASTY Prototype
  • Different ways of positioning the text prediction
    window
  • Fixed global shortcuts for the prediction
    selection
  • Integrated Tool for Setting the Options
  • Fixed sound and speech output systems with
    limited options

5
The Prediction Features of the Final FASTY
Prototype
  • Uni- and Bigram-based statistical prediction
  • Trigram-based Part-of-Speech statistical
    prediction
  • Grammar-based prediction ranking
  • Collocation based prediction
  • Compound prediction

6
Some problems of the Final FASTY Prototype
  • Not stable enough for a market product
  • Not enough options to adapt the system to users
  • General problems with the integration into the
    Operating System
  • Heavy System Load
  • Problems with the Dictionary Content
  • Fixed Speech Output and Sound System
  • Problems with the User Interface Design
  • Many user ideas could not be implemented

7
EMU the Next Generation
  • Using
  • the knowledge of the FASTY Project
  • the basic structure of the FASTY Project
  • the prediction techniques of the FASTY Project
  • the user comments from the FASTY Project tests
  • New
  • implementation from scratch
  • detailed structure to cope with the encountered
    problems
  • dictionaries
  • features coming from additional discussions with
    users

8
General Structure of EMU
  • Runtime
  • Language Component
  • User Interface
  • Adjustment

9
The EMU User Interface
  • Active part
  • receives keystrokes
  • initiates prediction procedure
  • sends predicted word (parts)
  • Runs on Windows 98, 2k, XP
  • Available in English, German, Italian Swedish
    (working on French)

10
Detailed Structure of the EMU User Interface
  • User Interface
  • Core
  • System Hook
  • Drivers
  • Text Sniffer
  • Language Component
  • Common Data Interface
  • Adjustment Tool

11
The Language Component of EMU
  • Platform independent
  • Language independent
  • Contains
  • Contextbox
  • Prediction Engine
  • Predicticion Parameter
  • Common Data Interface
  • Language Data

12
Changes within the Language Component from the
FASTY Final Prototype
  • New dictionaries available in 8 languages (Dutch,
    English, French, German, Italian, Spanish,
    Swedish, Turkish)
  • No Grammar-based ranking (only 0,2 KSR gain)
  • No Collocation based prediction (only 0,2 KSR
    gain)
  • Introduced common data interface with new
    optimized file format for language data
  • New abbreviation handling
  • Drastically lowered the system resource needs

13
Prediction Performance of the FASTY Final
Prototype
14
Prediction Performance of EMU
  • Little laboratory tests
  • Much better user feedback
  • Less wrong words (coming e.g. from news texts)
  • Predictions are optimized for the every day
    language
  • KSR some 5 points better than the FASTY Final
    prototype
  • More text type independent

15
The Adjustment Tool of EMU
  • Runs independently from the Runtime Program
  • Uses the same Common Interfaces as the Runtime
    Program
  • Very intuitive options with immediate feedback
  • Supports automatic user related dictionary
    creation from existing text
  • Supports import of existing MS-Word abbreviation
    dictionaries

16
Feedback example of the Adjustment Tool
  • Example line shows combined result
  • Color labels show single colors

17
Help example of the Adjustment Tool
  • Structured Feature list
  • Immediate help text
  • Less important / expert settings only shown when
    needed

18
A European Multilingual Text Prediction Software
http//www.is.tuwien.ac.at/emu/index_en.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com