Jill McCluskey and Elise Golan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Jill McCluskey and Elise Golan

Description:

Asymmetric information (search, experience, and credence goods) ... Psychological economics (Placebo effect in credence goods?) Behavioral economics ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Elise88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jill McCluskey and Elise Golan


1
All Food is Not Created EqualPolicy for
Agricultural Product Differentiation
  • Jill McCluskey and Elise Golan

2
Role of Government in Changing Food Markets
  • Explosion of differentiated products
  • new demands
  • new technologies
  • new industry structures
  • New role for Government?

3
Justification for Government Intervention
  • Farmers fear of exploitation by buyers
  • onerous, egregious, and downright illegal
    requirements by buyers
  • growing power of retailers - slotting fees,
    private label, etc
  • Consumer concerns (credence attributes)
  • is food safe? (bioterrorism)
  • does advertised attribute exist?
  • Unfair competition (fraud)
  • Napa Valley wine from China

4
More Justification
  • Facilitate trade by reducing search and
    transaction costs
  • too much information (cell phones and nutrition)
  • Social objectives
  • fair trade, sustainable, free range, slow, etc.
  • Too much differentiation (the anti-justification)
  • spatial models suggest too much product
    differentiation
  • utility is non-monotonic in choice

5
Policy Intervention Grades and Standards
  • How are mandatory grades and standards set?
  • objective safety considerations
  • producer driven?
  • political/consumer driven?
  • Do they improve the market outcome?
  • unsure because of multiple and confounding market
    failures
  • not usually but more likely when quality
    differences are great and difficult to detect
  • insane for government to help producers to
    differentiate

6
Policy Intervention Certification and
Accreditation
  • Certifying private standards
  • high quality justifies intervention?
  • Certifying the certifiers
  • Certifying testing methodologies

7
Policy Intervention Information
  • Reveal safety inspection information
  • Change consumer behavior? Maybe
  • Change firm behavior? Probably
  • Reveal nutrition information
  • Change consumer behavior? Maybe
  • Change firm behavior? Probably
  • Information least distortionary intervention?
  • Cost/benefit evidence?

8
Policy Intervention Help Consumers Make the
Right Choices
  • Help consumers interpret information
  • smarter consumers - education programs
  • smarter information - labeling and adverts
  • Restrict choice (choice is making us fat)
  • Paternalism (food assistance programs)
  • Libertarian paternalism (food defaults)
  • Expand choice (tyranny of the majority)
  • stimulate effective demand (WIC)
  • subsidize farmers markets, etc.
  • Construct choice?

9
Research Directions
  • Policy
  • Mandatory versus voluntary compliance with
    standards
  • Who chooses standards, who monitors government
    (which agency?) or private group
  • International trade barriers to trade vs.
    consumer sovereignty.
  • Free-riding in state agricultural products
  • Information overload and scarcity of label real
    estate
  • How product differentiation at the retail level
    filters down through the food system, e.g. farmer
    to retailer obstacles.
  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Valuation
  • Revealed vs. stated preferences
  • Choice experiments vs. contingent valuation
  • Effects of information supplied to survey
    participant.
  • Theory
  • Asymmetric information (search, experience, and
    credence goods)
  • Heterogeneity of not well modeled from a consumer
    point of view (e.g. representative consumer
    models)
  • Psychological economics (Placebo effect in
    credence goods?)
  • Behavioral economics

10
Valuation Issues Revealed vs Stated Preferences
  • Policy makers often must make decisions based on
    non-market valuation estimates.
  • RP techniques are based on actual behavior but
    are indirect and sensitive to model
    specification.
  • SP techniques are direct but hypothetical.

11
Revealed vs. Stated preferencesConsistency
Across Approaches?
  • Intuitive definition of consistency revealed
    preferences agree with stated preferences.
  • Statistical definitions of consistency are
  • Complete consistency equal parameters and equal
    variances.
  • Partial consistency equal parameters, but
    differences in terms of variances

12
Example Survey vs. Experiment
  • Numbered coupons were linked to numbered surveys.
  • 2 Step model approach
  • model stated preferences with a double-bounded
    model.
  • model actual behavior as a function of stated
    preferences and other attributes and
    socio-economic characteristics.
  • Test whether consumers acted consistently in the
    market experiment with their stated preferences.
  • Respondents with higher stated WTP were more
    likely to actually purchase the product.

13
Valuation Effects of information supplied to
survey participants
  • Studies show individuals place a greater weight
    on negative information than on positive
    information.
  • However, benefit information has a statistically
    significant effect on WTP for GM foods.
  • Information provision has greater effects for
    particular groups of consumers.
  • Source information matters.

14
Additional Research Directions
  • Free-rider effect
  • branded vs. minimum quality standards
  • whats the threshold size to stop imposing
    standards?
  • Differentiation by package size
  • may explain quantity surcharges
  • Psychology and economics
  • Placebo effect utility depends on beliefs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com