Diabetes overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Diabetes overview

Description:

Diabetes overview Tom Archer, MD, MBA UCSD Anesthesia – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:213
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: anessomU
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diabetes overview


1
Diabetes overview
Tom Archer, MD, MBA UCSD Anesthesia
2
Diabetic outpatient case
  • Healthy 48 y.o. diabetic for hernia repair /
    GA.
  • Elective, but patient has made plans.
  • Pt. stopped his metformin 48 hours before
    surgery, per instructions, and finger stick blood
    sugar 357.
  • Surgeon wants to proceed with minor procedure in
    a healthy patient.

3
Do we?
  • Proceed immediately and manage hyperglycemia on
    the fly?
  • Delay to later on the same day?
  • Delay to another day?

4
Other questions
  • What is our blood glucose cut-off that makes us
    delay surgery?
  • Should we insist on other tests or evaluations
    before proceeding?

5
Would you proceed with the case
immediately?UTHSCSA faculty response
6
Your blood glucose cut-off, above which you
would not immediately proceed with case. UTHSCSA
faculty response
7
Other considerations
  • Evaluate for dehydration and acidosis.
  • Get EKG, Chem 7, ABG or urine for glucose /
    ketones.
  • Worry about infection and wound healing.
  • Worry about DKA, MI, stroke, hypotension.

8
My perspective
  • Evidence-based safety, above all.
  • No UNNECESSARY delays or cancellations.
  • We have to JUSTIFY delays or cancellations.
  • Safety does NOT more tests and delays.

9
Dangers of hyperglycemia
  • Long term dangers in asymptomatic patients.
  • Short term dangers in sick patients.
  • No studies of short term dangers of HG in healthy
    patients!

10
Enormous dangers of hyperglycemia in pregnant
patients!
  • HG alters DNA transcription, causing
  • Diabetic embryopathy-- birth defects.
  • Diabetic fetopathy macrosomia and organ
    immaturity for gestational age (e.g. lung).
  • Placental vascular disease (IUGR, chronic
    malnutrition / hypoxia)
  • Non-specific inflammation, vasoconstriction,
    coagulation and fibrosis.
  • Decreased neutrophil / monocyte function.
  • Neonatal hypoglycemia

11
Obesity
Type II DM in 2006
Inflammation
Genetic predisposition
Insulin resistance
Hyperglycemia
Atherosclerosis Nephropathy Retinopathy Neuropathy
Immune dysfunction Poor wound healing
Decreased insulin output
Pancreatic beta cell damage
12
Hyperglycemia cries wolf to the innate immune
system activating it when it is not needed and
weakening its capacity to respond to a real
infection.
portland.indymedia.org accessed on Google images
13
Inflammation as a cause of disease has entered
the popular imagination. Diet (macronutrients)
is rightly perceived as a factor in causing
inflammation.
14
So, food kills! Calorie restricted mice live 30
longer than normally fed mice.
Calorie restricted mice http//www.lef.org/magazin
e/mag2006/images/jan2006_cover_lef_04.jpg
15
Insulin is a ANABOLIC hormone
  • Causes glucose uptake into muscle and liver,
    amino acid uptake into muscle and free fatty acid
    (FFA) uptake into adipose tissue.
  • Insulin affects gene transcription, allowing
    tissue growth and translocation of GLUT4
    transport protein to the cell membrane.
  • Insulin is NOT just about blood glucose control!

16
Insulin enables three distinct stages of glucose
utilization
  • Microvascular functionwithout insulin,
    microvasculature (capillaries and precapillary
    sphincters) do not supply blood appropriately to
    muscle cells.
  • Uptake of glucose into muscle cell requires GLUT4
    transport protein, made in response to insulin.
  • Phosphorylation of glucose to glucose-6-phosphate
    by hexokinase inside the mitochondrion, a
    limiting step of glucose utilization.

17
European Journal of Endocrinology 150
97104 European Journal of Endocrinology 150
97104 Bo Ahren and Giovanni Pacini
18
(No Transcript)
19
The hyperbolic function in diabetes
Obese non-diabetic (insulin resistance, but
compensated)
B
Pancreatic output of insulin
Thin non-diabetic
C
Obese, diabetic (no longer compensated)
A
Peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin
20
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
  • Definitive, landmark 1993 study. 1441 patients
    with type I DM followed for 9 years.
  • 35-70 reduction in retinopathy, neuropathy and
    nephropathy with intensive blood glucose control.

21
Hgb A1c vs. Microvascular Disease and Myocardial
Infarction in type II DM.
UKPDS 35. BMJ 2000 321 405-12
22
DIGAMI studyIntensive blood glucose control
after AMI lessens mortality.
  • Pts. had suspected MI and BG gt 200 mg
  • Both groups got thrombolysis, aspirin, beta
    blockers and ACE inhibitors as indicated.

Malmberg K DIGAMI study 1999
23
Admission glucose predicts long term mortality
after AMI. Intensive insulin therapy (over
months) mitigates effect of admission blood
glucose on mortality.
234 297 mg
lt234 mg
gt 297 mg
(Malmberg K DIGAMI study 1999)
24
Q How does glycemic control compare with other
post- AMI interventions?A Extremely well!
  • Absolute reduction of death rate
  • Thrombolysis 3.7
  • Acute beta blockade 3.5
  • Chronic beta blockade 9.3
  • Long term simvastatin 10.4
  • Aspirin 3.8 (CV events).
  • DIGAMI blood glucose control 15 absolute
    reduction of death rate over 3.4 years!

25
Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill
patients (Van den Berghe et. al. 2001)
  • Conventional therapy Average BG 173.
  • Intensive therapy Average BG 103.
  • Intensive therapy decreased
  • mortality (4.6 vs. 8)
  • renal failure
  • sepsis
  • polyneuropathy
  • prolonged mechanical ventilation
  • red cell transfusions

26
Trauma patients thresholds for damage from HG
  • Yendamuri 2003 HG gt 135 mg / dL ? increased ICU
    LOS, infection and mortality.
  • Laird 2004 HG gt 200 mg / dL ? increased
    mortality and infection.

27
Cardiac surgery and hyperglycemia
  • CPB damages endothelium (apart from its role in
    causing hyperglycemia).
  • CPB and hypothermia cause extreme hyperglycemia
    which damages endothelium.
  • CPB is a double insult for endothelium.

28
Tight glycemic control in diabetic CABG patients
improves outcomes.Lazar 2004, Ouattara 2005
  • Tight blood glucose control (target 125-200 mg )
    significantly reduced
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Sternal and leg wound infections and pneumonia
  • Time on ventilator
  • Maximum weight gain (edema?)
  • ICU stay duration
  • Post-op hospital stay
  • Recurrent ischemia
  • Angina class
  • Mortality in first two years

29
Increasing mean intraoperative blood glucose is
associated with increasing morbidity in cardiac
surgery Gandhi GY 2005
30
Furnary 2003
  • Best results with average post-CABG glucose lt 150
    mg .
  • Insulin infusion needed until POD 3

31
Changing practice downward trend over time in
average post- CABG glucose. Furnary 2002
32
Pre-op Hgb A1c gt 7 associated with increased
infections in surgical patientsDronge AS 2006
  • 647 known diabetic VA patients for non-cardiac
    surgery.
  • Infectious outcomes followed were pneumonia,
    wound infection, urinary tract infection or
    sepsis.
  • Retrospective analysis and statistical
    association only no proven causation.

33
So should we delay elective surgery if Hgb A1c gt
7?
  • Discussion of this option at UTHSCSA. Be careful
    what you wish for.
  • Be wary of setting unnecessarily stringent
    standards.
  • You may get sued if you dont adhere to your
    standard and there is a problem.
  • Its hard to abolish a standard, once set.

34
Paying (and suing?) for glycemic control in
cardiac and general surgery?
  • Will glycemic control soon be monitored and
    rewarded / punished by CMMS and other payers?
  • perioperative maintenance of normoglycemia
    will become a valid performance measure for
    practicing surgical specialists.
  • CMMS target in Turina study was 200 mg .
  • 150 mg is better, say commenting surgeons.

Turina M 2006
35
Hyperglycemia and the brain
  • Cardiac arrest, stroke, neurotrauma and
    neurosurgery
  • Both animal and human studies show that
    hyperglycemia during or after brain injury causes
    worse outcomes.

Capes SE 2001, Jeremitsky E 2005, Wass CT 1996
36
Hyperglycemia damages (activates) the
endothelium.
  • Hyperglycemia causes inflammation.

Reinhart K 2002, Dandona P 2005 J Clin Invest,
Dandona P 2003 Curr Drug Targets
37
(No Transcript)
38
Hyperglycemia, sepsis and pre-eclampsia all
activate (damage) endothelium, white cells and
platelets, leading to white cell adhesion and
infiltration, thrombosis and edema (inflammation).
WBC
WBC
Hyperglycemia, sepsis or pre-eclampsia
Platelet
Platelets
Protein (edema)
Archer TL 2006 unpublished
39
HG damages mitochondria
  • HG causes excessive entry of electrons (as NADH)
    into mitochondrial electron transport chain.
  • Excess electrons create reactive oxygen species,
    which damage mitochondria.

40
HG produces advanced glycation end-products (AGE)
  • Mechanically cross link and stiffen collagen and
    elastin fibers, decreasing tissue elasticity
    (e.g. arteries).
  • Activate AGE receptors on macrophages to produce
    inflammatory mediators.

41
Cooper ME 2004
42
Advanced Glycation Endproducts(AGE)
  • Stiffen tissues, ? Causing?
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Diastolic dysfunction
  • Stiff joints

Cooper ME 2004
43
Can we reverse AGE?
  • Alagebrium chloride is in phase II trials breaks
    AGE cross-links and restores vascular
    flexibility.
  • Pimagedine appears to block cross-link formation.
  • Reversal / prevention of atherosclerosis,
    systolic hypertension and diastolic dysfunction?

Cooper ME 2004
44
Endothelial cells send molecular signals to
surrounding smooth muscle
Insulin makes endothelium produce
Glucose makes endothelium produce
vasodilatory signals (NO, prostacyclin)
Vessel lumen
vasoconstrictive signals (thromboxane, endothelin)
Archer TL 2006 unpublished, Idea from Dandona P
2004
45
How rapidly can endothelial activation occur?
  • Evidence from 300 cal of oral glucose vs. 300 cal
    of vodka.
  • Oral glucose increases inflammatory markers
    within 2 hours.
  • Equal calories as ethanol do not.
  • Is this relevant to our outpatient scenario? We
    dont know.

Dhindsa S 2004
46
Back to the outpatient case
  • Why is blood glucose 357 so bad in ICU patient,
    yet well-tolerated in many ambulatory patients?
  • Should we delay the case, since blood glucose in
    critically ill patients appears to be
    increasingly dangerous above the 150 mg range?
  • Or should we proceed, since no one has shown that
    short-term hyperglycemia harms asymptomatic
    patients?

47
Critical illness and hyperglycemia work
synergistically to damage endothelium.
  • The significance of a blood glucose level depends
    on what else is going on with the patients
    endothelium.
  • In other words, we have to look at a given blood
    sugar value in context.

48
For any given blood glucose value, end organ
damage will depend on degree of non-hyperglycemic
endothelial damage.
Zone of severe end-organ damage
Non-hyperglycemic endothelial damage (sepsis,
etc.)
Zone of
Zone of
moderate end-
limited
organ damage
end-organ
damage
Zone of no end-organ damage
Blood glucose
Archer TL 2006 unpublished
49
Hyperglycemia may cause different degrees of
end-organ damage, depending on the degree of
pre-existing endothelial damage.
Patient B
Zone of severe end-organ damage
Non-hyperglycemic endothelial damage (sepsis,
etc.)
Zone of
Zone of
moderate end-
limited
organ damage
end-organ
damage
Zone of no end-organ damage
Patient A
Blood glucose
Archer TL 2006 unpublished
50
For any degree of non-hyperglycemic endothelial
damage, end organ damage will depend on level of
hyperglycemia.
Zone of severe end-organ damage
Non-hyperglycemic endothelial damage (sepsis,
etc.)
Zone of
Zone of
moderate end-
limited
organ damage
end-organ
damage
Zone of no end-organ damage
Blood glucose
Archer TL 2006 unpublished
51
So, what do we do with our outpatient with blood
glucose 357?
  • Discuss benefits of tight glucose control with
    patient and surgeon.
  • Use the occasion as a teachable moment (Roizen)
    to stimulate patient toward better health.
  • Be aware that surgeons themselves are starting to
    talk about BG 150-200 mg as a reasonable
    perioperative target for major surgery.

52
What else should we do?
  • Consider NOT stopping metformin-- to help keep
    blood glucose down.
  • Evidence against perioperative metformin is weak
    to non-existent.

Misbin RI 2004, Holstein A 2005
53
In summary
  • Both HG and serious illness activate
    endothelium, causing inflammation,
    vasoconstriction, coagulation and fibrosis.

54
In summary
  • Long term HG increases CV disease, retinopathy,
    neuropathy and nephropathy in asymptomatic
    diabetics.
  • Short term HG causes multiple and serious
    complications in sick patients-- in whom the
    endothelium is already compromised.

55
In summary
  • However, there is no evidence at present that
    short term hyperglycemia in an asymptomatic
    patient confers increased risk of surgical or
    anesthetic complications.
  • Until such evidence is forthcoming, caution,
    clinical judgment and common sense must guide
    our practice.

56
  • The End

57
References (1)
  • Ahmed N. Diabetes Research Clinical Practice.
    67(1)3-21, 2005 Jan. Capes SE et al Stroke
    2001 322426-2432.
  • Cooper ME American Journal of Hypertension
    20041731S-38S
  • Coutinho M et al Diabetes Care 1999 22233-240.
  • Dandona P Current Drug Targets 2003 4, 487-492.
  • Dandona P et al Med Clin N Am 88 2004, 911-931
  • Dandona P et al J Clin Invest 2005, 1152069-2072
  • Dhindsa S et al Metabolism 2004 53 330-334.
  • Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)
    Research Group. New England Journal of Medicine
    September 30, 1993 Volume 329977-986. No 14.
  • Dronge AS et al Arch Surg 2006 141375-380
  • Finney SJ et al JAMA 2003 2902041-2047
  • Freire AX et al Chest 2005 1283109-3116
  • Furnary AP et al J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003
    1251007-21
  • Gandhi GY et al Mayo Clin Proc July 2005
    80(7)862-866

58
References (2)
  • Holstein A et al Diabetologia (2005)
    482454-2459.
  • Jeremitsky E et al J Trauma 20055847-50.
  • Khaw KT et al BMJ 20013221-6
  • Krinsley JS et al Mayo Clin Proc
    200479(8)992-1000.
  • Laird AM et al J Trauma 2004561058-1062
  • Langouche L et al J of Clin Invest
    2005115(8)2277-2286.
  • Lazar HL et al Circulation 20041091497-1502
  • Leiter LA et al AJH 200518121-128
  • Malmberg K et al Circulation 1999992626-2632
  • Misbin RI Diabetes Care Volume 2004
    27(7)1791-1793
  • Ouattara A et al Anesthesiology 2005 V 103, No 4,
    pp. 687-694
  • Reinhart K et al Crit Care Med 2002 30Suppl.
    S302-312
  • Turina M et al Crit Care Med 2005 Vol.33, No. 7,
    pp.1624-1633.
  • Turina M et al Annals of Surgery vol 243 number 6
    June 2006
  • UKPDS Lancet 1998 352 854-865.

59
References (3)
  • Umpierrez GE et al J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002
    87978-982.
  • Viberti G New England Journal of Medicine Vol
    3321293-1294, May 11, 1995, Number 19.
  • Van den Berghe G et al N Engl J Med
    20013451359-67
  • Vanhorebeek I et al Lancet 200536553-59.
  • Vanhorebeek I et al Curr Opin Crit Care 2005,
    11304-311
  • Wass CT et al Mayo Clin Proc 1996 Vol
    71(8)801-812.
  • Yendamuri S et al J Trauma 20035533-38.
  • Whitcomb BW Crit Care Med 2005 332772-2777
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com