Screening Women for Rectal Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: More Questions than Answers? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Screening Women for Rectal Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: More Questions than Answers?

Description:

Screening Women for Rectal Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: More Questions than Answers? Susan S. Philip MD, MPH Medical Director, San Francisco City Clinic – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: SUSANP85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Screening Women for Rectal Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: More Questions than Answers?


1
Screening Women for Rectal Chlamydia and
Gonorrhea More Questions than Answers?
  • Susan S. Philip MD, MPH
  • Medical Director, San Francisco City Clinic
  • San Francisco Department of Public Health
  • Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine
  • University of California, San Francisco

2
What are the Questions?
  • How prevalent are rectal chlamydia (CT) and
    gonorrhea (GC) infections in women?
  • Can we predict which women are likely to be
    infected?
  • What are the sequelae of rectal infections in
    women who do not report anal sex?
  • What should be our recommendations for screening?

3
What do we Know from Men?
4
Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal
infections among MSM, - San Francisco, 2003
Urethral Infections
n5305 n783
n5283 n783
Rectal Infections
n3300 n492
n3300 n525
Pharyngeal Infections
n3300 n492
n3300 n525
Chlamydia
Gonorrhea
Kent, CK et al, Clin Infect Dis July 2005
5
Proportion of asymptomatic rectal and urethral
chlamydial and gonococcal infection among MSM
San Francisco, 2003
Rectal Infections
Gonorrhea
Chlamydia
n316
n264
Asymptomatic
Urethral Infections
Symptomatic
Gonorrhea
Chlamydia
n315
n364
Kent, CK et al, Clin Infect Dis July 2005
6
Proportion of chlamydial and gonococcal
infections missed if only urine/urethral
screening performed among MSM San Francisco,
2003
Gonorrhea
Chlamydia
n574
n574
Identified
Not Identified
Kent, CK et al, Clin Infect Dis July 2005
7
Chlamydia and Gonorrhea are associated with
increased HIV infection rates
Odds ratio for HIV infection (compared to no STD)
Women 2-6
MSM 3-5
Fleming and Wasserheit STI 1999
8
Risk of recent HIV acquisition among MSM with
rectal infections San Francisco STD Clinic
2001 to 2004
  • Incident HIV measured by STARHS
  • RR rectal CT or GC 3.7 (2.2 6.4)
  • RR rectal CT and GC 9.5 (4.4 20.6)
  • Similar estimates if look at only asymptomatic
    rectal infections

Kent et al. 1st Intnatl Wkshp HIV Transmission
2006
9
What is in the Literature?
10
How common are rectal infections in Women?
  • Primarily older studies with limitations
  • STD clinic populations
  • Selective testing (lapses, contacts, those
    reporting anal sex)
  • Used older diagnostic tests (culture, IF), not
    nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs)
  • Gonorrhea 40-63 of women with GC had rectal
    infection in a 1977 review of 23 papers1
  • Chlamydia Cervical prevalence 13, rectal 5 in
    101 consecutive new patients at a GUM clinic in
    Edinburgh2. Rectal prevalence 10 in another
    study from Liverpool3

1Klein 1977 2Thompson 1989 3Pratt 1989
11
Other Aspects of Rectal Infections
  • 3-7 had rectal infection without cervical
    infection1,2,4,5
  • If infected with GC at both sites concordance
    between cervical and vaginal isolates 40-906,7
    (by antibiotic susceptibility testing, gel
    electrophoresis patterns, serologic typing)
  • Reported anal sex varied from as low as 0 to as
    much as 40-50 in different studies1-3.

1Klein 1977 2Thompson 1989 3Pratt 1989
4Stansfield 1979 5Asbel Abstract 113 CDC STD
Prevention Conference 2006 6Coghill 1989 7Noble
1980
12
Possible Explanations?
  • Incomplete or inaccurate behavior reports
  • Penile-anal contact other than anal sex
  • Auto-inoculation via infected vaginal secretions

13
City Clinic Study Methods
  • Evaluation period March 2007-February 2008
  • Convenience sample of 60 of female clinic
    patients (n3300) were asked about sex practices
    in the prior 3 months
  • Chlamydia and Gonorrhea NAATs using vaginal swabs
    (Aptima Combo2, GenProbe Inc., San Diego CA) were
    offered to
  • Any women lt30 years
  • Contact to GC or CT (any age)
  • Vaginal symptoms (any age)
  • Clinician-collected rectal CT and GC NAATs were
    obtained from those women undergoing pelvic exam

14
City Clinic Study Results
  • Receptive anal sex in the prior 3 months reported
    by 14 of women (465/3300)
  • Median age 26, 60 were nonwhite
  • Women were positive for rectal GC at 1.8
    (15/801) of visits. The correlation with vaginal
    results was strong (r0.93, plt0.0001)
  • Rectal CT was positive at 5.1 (42/818) of visits
    and had less correlation with vaginal results
    (r0.68, plt0.0001)

Pearson correlation coefficient
15
Prevalence of Rectal GC by reported behavior
n756 visits
p0.007
Chi-square test
16
Prevalence of Rectal CT by reported behavior
n762 visits
p0.14
Chi-square test
17
Proportion of additional gonorrhea and
chlamydiacases identified by rectal testing
7
21
93
79
Gonorrhea n15
Chlamydia n42
18
City Clinic Study Conclusions
  • Rectal GC and CT were present in women who did
    not report anal sex
  • Reported risk behaviors may not be helpful in
    guiding rectal testing in women, in contrast to
    men
  • There was less correlation with vaginal NAAT
    results for rectal CT than GC
  • The addition of rectal testing increased case
    finding for both GC and CT

19
City Clinic Study Conclusions, continued
  • The clinical implications of asymptomatic rectal
    CT and GC infections in women require further
    study
  • We also do not yet know whether infection at
    multiple anogenital anatomic sites in women is
    associated with increased risk of subsequent
    reinfection, PID or other sequelae

20
Next steps?
  • Routine rectal testing in asymptomatic women has
    been discontinued at City Clinic due to uncertain
    clinical benefit and budget constraints
  • We aim to review San Francisco morbidity data in
    our database to compare recurrent CT or GC
    outcomes in women who are infected at both sites,
    compared to those with cervico-vaginal infection
    only.

21
Back to the Questions
  • How prevalent are rectal gonorrhea (GC) and
    chlamydia (CT) infections in women?
  • Depends on testing method
  • Multiple studies with gt5 prevalence of either
    infection in female STD clinic attendees
  • May be the only site of infection
  • Can we predict which women are likely to be
    infected?
  • Reported anal sex not accurate
  • What are the sequelae of rectal infections in
    women who do not report anal sex?
  • ???
  • What should be our recommendations for screening?
  • ????????

22
Acknowledgements
  • Jeff Klausner MD, MPH
  • Kyle Bernstein PhD
  • Robert Kohn MPH
  • SF City Clinic Clinicians and staff
  • City Clinic patients
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com