Protecting Consumers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Protecting Consumers

Description:

... (30,446) (3.6) Mobile Phones (27,078) (3.2) Personal goods and services 137,326 16.3 Clothing and clothing fabrics (35,882) (4.3) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: KevinH155
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Protecting Consumers


1
Protecting Consumers
  • Kevin Hinde

2
Introduction
  • Examines the policy framework within the UK and
    EC that focuses on controlling the worse excesses
    of rogue trading.
  • Explores two problems faced by consumers and
    reputable traders alike adverse selection and
    moral hazard.
  • Briefly considers the role of self-regulation as
    a mechanism for addressing the problem and
    considers alternatives

3
Consumer Protection in Europe
  • The European Commission
  • DGXXIV
  • Article 153
  • The UK
  • Various government departments
  • Local government
  • Consumer Organisations

4
Impact of Consumer Complaints
5
(No Transcript)
6
Consumer Detriment
  • OFT has tried to capture the loss in consumer
    surplus
  • consumer detriment in the UK totaled 8.3
    billion per annum, equivalent to 1.5 of annual
    household consumer expenditure.
  • approximately 180 per adult every year and
    approached 1 of Gross Domestic Product
  • an underestimate?

7
Explaining Consumer Complaints
  • Most markets work well
  • Frequent transactions and few resources tied up
    with the exchange process.
  • However,
  • Adverse Selection
  • Moral Hazard

8
Adverse Selection
  • Defined as a process by which an undesirable
    population of buyers or sellers with an
    information bias are more likely to participate
    in voluntary exchange.
  • In this instance the undesirable population are
    sellers (cowboys) and they are attracted to the
    market in general before any transaction has
    taken place because of the potential returns.

9
Adverse Selection
  • Double Glazing Example
  • 75 chance of high quality service
  • 25 chance of poor quality service
  • High quality costs 2600
  • Low Quality costs 1800
  • Expected Value
  • (0.75 x 2600) (0.25 x 1800) 2400
  • Market will not perform efficiently it may even
    fail to operate altogether!

10
Moral Hazard
  • An ex post contractual problem that may result
    because participants to the exchange process have
    information that allows them to act in an
    opportunistic manner once the transaction has
    been entered into.
  • Double Glazing example. Customer chooses a
    supplier, pays over a deposit but once locked
    in to the transaction supplier may act with
    guile.

11
Overcoming the problem
  • Contracts
  • Warranties, guarantees and insurance
  • Brands
  • Self Regulation
  • Signalling and Screening
  • Problems of Self Regulation
  • Screening costs
  • Cartels
  • Profusion of Institutes
  • Credibility

12
Self Regulation versus Statutory Regulation
  • Doyle(1997) notes that self regulation is
    relevant where
  • Organisational Structures are simple
  • Competition is vigorous
  • Goods and services are well defined
  • Information is largely in the public domain
  • Statutory Regulation is required where
  • Structures are complex hierarchies, including
    transnational operations
  • Goods and services are complex such that
    information asymmetries may exist
  • A two-tiered approach is used in many
    industries, i.e. the law is used as a weapon of
    last resort.

13
Some web references
  • Vickers J (2003) Economics for Consumer Policy,
    British Academy Keynes Lecture, OFT Speech, 29th
    October 2003 (You dont need to know the model in
    the appendix).
  • Self Regulation and statutory Regulation,
    Business Strategy Review, vol. 8, no.3, 35-42,
    Summer. Available via the Librarys Electronic
    Journal Gateway.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com