Lecture 2: The antisocial ( - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 2: The antisocial (

Description:

Lecture 2: The antisocial ( psychopathic ) personality Elliot Ness The psychopath sees himself as the innocent victim of a cruel and oppressive world ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: NUS52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 2: The antisocial (


1
Lecture 2The antisocial (psychopathic)
personality
Elliot Ness
  • The psychopath sees himself as the innocent
    victim of a cruel and oppressive world other
    people are to blame for his problems. Others
    exist for his gratification they are either an
    annoyance to be gotten rid of, or else a
    resource for his self-gratificationbut is he
    just, in everyday parlance, a bastard?

2
Contrating views on the concept of psychopathy
  • Like love, a many-splendoured thing (Howard,
    198?)
  • The categorical concept of psychopath ismerely
    a convenient fiction Blackburn, 1993)
  • A label that lacks all scientific and
    jurisprudential legitimacy. To retain the concept
    is morally insane death to it. (Caradino, 1998)
  • the biggest, most serious and most controversial
    medico-legal and social problemThey
    (psychopaths) are the sports of the human
    raceThey are devoid of affection, are cold,
    heartless, callous, cynical, and show a lack of
    judgement forethought which is almost beyond
    belief. Conduct abnormality of such a degree
    type as to constitute the greatest potential
    danger to the individual his victim (Anonymous
    psychiatrist, 196?)

3
Interpersonal
Affective
4
Pritchard (1837) Moral insanity
  • Intellectual faculties appear to have sustained
    little or no injury, while the disorder is
    manifest principally or alone, in the state of
    the feelings, temper or habitsthe moral and
    active principles of the mind are strangely
    perverted and depraved the power of
    self-government is lost or greatly impaired and
    the individual is found to be incapable, not of
    talking or reasoning upon any subject proposed to
    himbut of conducting himself with decency and
    impropriety in the business of life

5
Cleckley The Mask of Sanity (1955)
  • Superficial charm good intelligence
  • Absence of delusions/irrational thinking
  • Absence of psychoneurosis
  • Unreliability
  • Untruthfulness insincerity
  • Lack of remorse or shame
  • Inadequately motivated antisocial behaviour
  • Poor judgement/failure to learn from experience
  • Pathological egocentricity incapacity for love
  • General poverty of affect.

6
Cleckleys criteria (contd)
  • Loss of insight
  • Unresponsiveness in general interpersonal
    reactions
  • Fantastic uninviting behaviour with drink and
    sometimes without.
  • Suicide rarely carried out
  • Sex life impersonal, trivial poorly integrated
  • Failure to follow any life-plan.

7
Psychopathy checklist (PCL) 2 factors
  • 1 Interpersonal/Affective selfish, callous
    remorseless use of others
  • 2 Chronic ASB chronically unstable antisocial
    lifestyle

8
Psychopathy Checklist Factors
  • Factor 1 Interpersonal-Affective
  • Glibness and Superficial Charm
  • Egocentricity/grandiose sense of self-worth
  • Pathological lying and deception
  • Conning/Lack of Sincerity
  • Lack of affect and emotional depth
  • Callous/Lack of empathy
  • Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
  • Drug or alcohol not direct cause of antisocial
    behaviour

9
Psychopathy Checklist Factors
  • Factor 2 Social deviance
  • Proneness to boredom/Low Frustration tolerance
  • Parasitic Life-style
  • Short-tempered/Poor Behaviour Controls
  • Early behaviour problems
  • Lack of realistic long-term plans
  • Impulsivity
  • Irresponsible behaviour as a parent
  • Frequent marital relationships
  • Juvenile Delinquency
  • Poor probation or parole risk
  • Many types of offense

10
But 3 factor model seems to fit the data best.
  • Factor 1 Interpersonal superficial, grandiose
  • Factor 2 Affective lack of remorse, empathy
    failure to accept responsibility for actions.
  • Factor 3 Behavioural Impulsive/poor behavioural
    controls.

11
Conceptual issues/assessment
Developmental antecedents
Relationship to DSM-III Pers. Dis.
Psychosocial Correlates
Treatment Rehabilitation
PSYCHOPATHY
Biological correlates
Successful vs. unsuccessful
Cross-cultural aspects
Recidivism
12
Cross-Cultural Issues
  • 1) Prevalence of psychopathy across cultures?
  • 2) Appropriate PCL cut-off for diagnosing
    psychopathy does it vary across cultures?
  • 3) Is the expression of psychopathy dependent on
    cultural context, or does its aetiology vary
    across cultures?

13
Prevalence of psychopathy across cultures
  • Does vary prevalence lower in European countries
    (15 of prison inmates in Scotland) than in N.
    American prison samples (25), BUT..
  • While interpers. and social deviance factors vary
    cross-culturally, the affective factor doesnt
    this is the pan-cultural core of psychopathy,
    whose aetiology presumably is cross-cuturally
    invariant

14
Are there neurobiological substrates of
personality disorders, e.g. psychopathy?
  • It probably doesnt make sense to look for a
    specific brain correlate of e.g. psychopathy
  • It makes more sense to look for specific
    neurocognitive processing deficits, e.g. in
    processing of affective material (in the case of
    psychopaths) or deficits in affective
    self-control, e.g. a lack of ability to delay
    gratification.

15
Psychopathy Issues arising
  • What about successful (non-criminal)
    psychopaths?
  • Medico-legal issues
  • Are they mad, bad or what?
  • How to deal with them?
  • UK Govt programme Dangerous Severe
    Pers. Dis (DSPD) See Issues in Forensic
    Psychology 4, B.P.S., 2003 and
    http//www.dspdprogramme.gov.uk
  • Are psychopaths treatable? The majority of the
    literature on therapeutic outcome with psychos
    is pessimistic, but see Development of a
    Programme for Violent Psychopathic Offenders
    (available from above website). Uses CBT and
    skills training to target the dynamic risk
    factors associated with an individuals violent
    behaviour

16
Criteria for DSPD Any of the following must
apply
  • Very High Psychopathy (PCL gt/ 30)
  • High Psychopathy (PCL 25-29) at least 1 DSM PD
    other than ASPD
  • Two or more DSM pers. dis. Diagnoses
  • Individual must present with
  • High risk (gt50 chance of (re)offending
  • Severe personality disorder (as above)
  • Risk is linked to the personality disorder

17
Are psychopaths treatable?
  • The majority of the literature on therapeutic
    outcome with psychos is pessimistic, but see
    Development of a Programme for Violent
    Psychopathic Offenders (available from website
    http//www.dspdprogramme.gov.uk)
  • Uses CBT and skills training to target the
    dynamic risk factors associated with an
    individuals violent behaviour

18
Are psychopaths not just complete and utter
bastards?
  • A label that lacks all scientific and
    jurisprudential legitimacy. To retain the concept
    is morally insane death to it. (Caradino, 1998)

19
So does the term psychopathy and the tests used
to measure it (e.g. PCL)..
  • represent the medicalisation of bastardry?

20
But on the other hand, psychopathy has been
called
  • the biggest, most serious and most controversial
    medico-legal and social problemThey
    (psychopaths) are the sports of the human
    raceThey are devoid of affection, are cold,
    heartless, callous, cynical, and show a lack of
    judgement forethought which is almost beyond
    belief. Conduct abnormality of such a degree
    type as to constitute the greatest potential
    danger to the individual his victim (Anonymous
    psychiatrist, 196?)

21
Case of Mr WK see Hand-outIs he likely to
re-offend?
  • 31-year-old male
  • Section 121(2)(b)(ii) CJA
  • Charged with Rape
  • Attempted rape
  • Indecent assault

22
W.K. FAMILY HISTORY
  • Parents separated when W was 2 months
  • 7 siblings
  • Disorganised chaotic childhood
  • Foster care at age 6 years and then again age 14
    yrs.
  • Fighting, theft, truanting from an early age
  • Left school at 15 yrs with no qualifications
  • Minimal contact with family over the last 10 years
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com