X-RAY DIFFRACTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

X-RAY DIFFRACTION

Description:

... of solvus line in phase diagrams Long range order ... diffraction in a Transmission Electron Microscope ... x-ray beam is diffracted by these ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:234
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: acer189
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: X-RAY DIFFRACTION


1
X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • X- Ray Sources
  • Diffraction Braggs Law
  • Crystal Structure Determination

Elements of X-Ray Diffraction B.D. Cullity
S.R. Stock Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
(2001)
  • Recommended websites
  • http//www.matter.org.uk/diffraction/
  • http//www.ngsir.netfirms.com/englishhtm/Diffract
    ion.htm

2
What will you learn in this sub-chapter?
  • How to produce monochromatic X-rays?
  • How does a crystal scatter these X-rays to give a
    diffraction pattern? ? Braggs equation
  • What determines the position of the XRD peaks? ?
    Answer) the lattice
  • What determines the intensity of the XRD peaks? ?
    Answer) the motif
  • What other uses can XRD be put to apart from
    crystal structure determination?? Grain size
    determination ? Strain in the material

3
Some Basics
  • For electromagnetic radiation to be diffracted
    the spacing in the grating (a series of
    obstacles) should be of the same order as the
    wavelength.
  • In crystals the typical interatomic spacing 2-3
    Å so the suitable radiation is X-rays.
  • Hence, X-rays can be used for the study of
    crystal structures.

aCu 3.61 Å ? dhkl is equal to aCu or less
than that (e.g. d111 aCu/?3 2.08 Å)
4
Generation of X-rays
  • X-rays can be generated by decelerating electrons

Target
X-rays
Beam of electrons
A accelerating (or decelerating) charge radiates
electromagnetic radiation
5
Mo Target impacted by electrons accelerated by a
35 kV potential shows the emission spectrum as in
the figure below (schematic)
X-ray sources with different ? for doing XRD
studies
Target Metal ? Of K? radiation (Å)
Mo 0.71
Cu 1.54
Co 1.79
Fe 1.94
Cr 2.29
The high intensity nearly monochromatic K? x-rays
can be used as a radiation source for X-ray
diffraction (XRD) studies ? a monochromator can
be used to further decrease the spread of
wavelengths in the X-ray
6
(No Transcript)
7
  • When X-rays hit a specimen, the interaction can
    result in various signals/emissions/effects
  • The coherently scattered X-rays are the ones
    important from a XRD perspective

Incident X-rays
Absorption (Heat)
SPECIMEN
Fluorescent X-rays
Electrons
Scattered X-rays
Compton recoil
Photoelectrons
Coherent From bound charges
Incoherent (Compton modified) From loosely bound
charges
Click here to know more
Transmitted beam
X-rays can also be refracted (refractive index
slightly less than 1) and reflected (at very
small angles)
8
Diffraction
  • Now we shall consider the important topic as to
    how X-rays interact with a crystalline array (of
    atoms, ions etc.) to give rise to the phenomenon
    known as X-ray diffraction (XRD).
  • Diffraction (with sharp peaks) (with XRD being a
    specific case) requires two important conditions
    to be met? Coherent waves (with wavelength ?)
    on a? Crystalline array with spacing of the
    order of () ?
  • The waves could be ? electromagnetic waves
    (light, X-rays), ? matter waves (electrons,
    neutrons) or ? mechanical waves (sound, waves
    on water surface)
  • In short diffraction is coherent reinforced
    scattering (or reinforced scattering of coherent
    waves)
  • In a sense diffraction is nothing but a special
    case of constructive ( destructive)
    interferenceTo give an analogy ? the results of
    Youngs double slit experiment is interpreted as
    interference, while the result of multiple slits
    is categorized under diffraction

A quasicrystalline array will also lead to
diffraction (which we shall not consider in this
text) With a de Broglie wavelength
9
XRD ? the first step
  • A beam of X-rays directed at a crystal interacts
    with the electrons of the atoms in the crystal
  • The electrons oscillate under the influence of
    the incoming X-Rays and become secondary sources
    of EM radiation
  • The secondary radiation is in all directions
  • The waves emitted by the electrons have the same
    frequency as the incoming X-rays ? coherent
  • The emission can undergo constructive or
    destructive interference

Schematics
10
Some points to recon with
  • We can get a better physical picture of
    diffraction by using Laues formalism (leading to
    the Laues equations)
  • However, a parallel approach to diffraction is
    via the method of Bragg, wherein diffraction can
    be visualized as reflections from a set of
    planes
  • As the approach of Bragg is easier to grasp we
    shall use that in this elementary text
  • We shall do some intriguing mental experiments to
    utilize the Braggs equation (Braggs model) with
    caution
  • Let us consider a coherent wave of X-rays
    impinging on a crystal with atomic planes at an
    angle ? to the rays
  • Incident and scattered waves are in phase if the
    i) in-plane scattering is in phase and ii)
    scattering from across the planes is in phase

In plane scattering is in phase
Incident and scattered waves are in phase if
Scattering from across planes is in phase
11
Let us consider in-plane scattering
There is more to this Click here to know more
and get introduced to Laue equations describing
diffraction
Extra path traveled by incoming waves ? AY
These can be in phase if ? ?incident ?scattered
Extra path traveled by scattered waves ? XB
But this is still reinforced scatteringand NOT
reflection
12
BRAGGs EQUATION
Let us consider scattering across planes
Click here to visualize constructive and
destructive interference
  • A portion of the crystal is shown for clarity-
    actually, for destructive interference to occur
    many planes are required (and the interaction
    volume of x-rays is large as compared to that
    shown in the schematic).
  • The scattering planes have a spacing d.
  • Ray-2 travels an extra path as compared to Ray-1
    ( ABC). The path difference between Ray-1 and
    Ray-2 ABC (d Sin? d Sin?) (2d.Sin?).
  • For constructive interference, this path
    difference should be an integral multiple of ?
    n? 2d Sin? ? the Braggs equation. (More about
    this sooner).
  • The path difference between Ray-1 and Ray-3 is
    2?(2d.Sin?) 2?n? 2n?. This implies that if
    Ray-1 and Ray-2 constructively interfere Ray-1
    and Ray-3 will also constructively interfere.
    (And so forth).

13
  • The previous page explained how constructive
    interference occurs. How about the rays just of
    Bragg angle? Obviously the path difference would
    be just off ? as in the figure below. How come
    these rays go missing?

Click here to understand how destructive
interference of just of-Bragg rays occur
Interference of Ray-1 with Ray-2
Note that they almost constructively interfere!
14
Reflection versus Diffraction
  • Though diffraction (according to Braggs picture)
    has been visualized as a reflection from a set of
    planes with interplanar spacing d ? diffraction
    should not be confused with reflection (specular
    reflection)

Reflection Diffraction
Occurs from surface Occurs throughout the bulk
Takes place at any angle Takes place only at Bragg angles
100 of the intensity may be reflected Small fraction of intensity is diffracted
Note X-rays can be reflected at very small
angles of incidence
15
Understanding the Braggs equation
  • n? 2d Sin?The equation is written better with
    some descriptive subscripts
  • n is an integer and is the order of the
    reflection (i.e. how many wavelengths of the
    X-ray go on to make the path difference between
    planes)
  • Braggs equation is a negative statement? If
    Braggs eq. is NOT satisfied ? NO reflection
    can occur? If Braggs eq. is satisfied ?
    reflection MAY occur (How?- we shall see this
    a little later)
  • The interplanar spacing appears in the Braggs
    equation, but not the interatomic spacing a
    along the plane (which had forced ?incident
    ?scattered) but we are not free to move the
    atoms along the plane randomly ? click here to
    know more
  • ? For large interplanar spacing the angle of
    reflection tends towards zero ? as d increases,
    Sin? decreases (and so does ?)? The smallest
    interplanar spacing from which Bragg diffraction
    can be obtained is ?/2 ? maximum value of ? is
    90?, Sin? is 1 ? from Bragg equation d ?/2

16
Order of the reflection (n)
  • For Cu K? radiation (? 1.54 Å) and d110 2.22
    Å

n Sin? n?/2d ?
1 0.34 20.7º First order reflection from (110) ? 110
2 0.69 43.92º Second order reflection from (110) planes ? 110 Also considered as first order reflection from (220) planes ? 220
Relation between dnh nk nl and dhkl
e.g.
17
In XRD nth order reflection from (h k l) is
considered as 1st order reflection from (nh nk nl)
Hence, (100) planes are a subset of (200) planes
Important point to note In a simple cubic
crystal, 100, 200, 300 are all allowed
reflections. But, there are no atoms in the
planes lying within the unit cell! Though, first
order reflection from 200 planes is equivalent
(mathematically) to the second order reflection
from 100 planes for visualization purposes of
scattering, this is better thought of as the
later process (i.e. second order reflection from
(100) planes)
18
Forward and Back Diffraction
Here a guide for quick visualization of forward
and backward scattering (diffraction) is presented
19
Funda Check
  • What is ? (theta) in the Braggs equation?
  • ? is the angle between the incident x-rays and
    the set of parallel atomic planes (which have a
    spacing dhkl). Which is 10? in the above figure.
  • It is NOT the angle between the x-rays and the
    sample surface (note specimens could be
    spherical or could have a rough surface)

20
The missing reflections
  • We had mentioned that Braggs equation is a
    negative statement i.e. just because Braggs
    equation is satisfied a reflection may not be
    observed
  • Let us consider the case of Cu K? radiation (?
    1.54 Å) being diffracted from (100) planes of Mo
    (BCC, a 3.15 Å d100)

But this reflection is absent in BCC Mo
The missing reflection is due to the presence of
additional atoms in the unit cell (which are
positions at lattice points) ? which we shall
consider next
However, the second order reflection from (100)
planes (which is equivalent to the first order
reflection from the (200) planes is observed
21
Important points
  • Presence of additional atoms/ions/molecules in
    the UC ? at lattice points? or as a part of the
    motif can alter the intensities of some
    of the reflections
  • Some of the reflections may even go missing
  • Position of the reflections/peaks tells us
    about the lattice type.
  • The Intensities tells us about the motif.

22
Intensity of the Scattered waves
  • Braggs equation tells us about the position of
    the intensity peaks (in terms of ?) ? but tells
    us nothing about the intensities. The intensities
    of the peaks depend on many factors as considered
    here.

Scattering by a crystal can be understood in
three steps
To understand the scattering from a crystal
leading to the intensity of reflections (and
why some reflections go missing), three levels of
scattering have to be considered 1) scattering
from electrons 2) scattering from an atom 3)
scattering from a unit cell Click here to know
the details
A
Electron
Polarization factor
B
  • Structure Factor (F) The resultant wave
    scattered by all atoms of the unit cell
  • The Structure Factor is independent of the shape
    and size of the unit cell but is dependent on
    the position of the atoms/ions etc. within the
    cell

Atom
Atomic scattering factor (f)
C
Structure factor calculations Intensity in
powder patterns
Unit cell (uc)
Structure factor (F)
Click here to know more about
23
  • The concept of a Reciprocal lattice and the Ewald
    Sphere construction
  • Reciprocal lattice and Ewald sphere constructions
    are important tools towards understanding
    diffraction (especially diffraction in a
    Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM))
  • A lattice in which planes in the real lattice
    become points in the reciprocal lattice is a very
    useful one in understanding diffraction
  • ? click here to go to a detailed description of
    these topics

Reciprocal Lattice Ewald Sphere construction
Click here to know more about
24
Selection / Extinction Rules
  • As we have noted before even if Braggs equation
    is satisfied, reflections may go missing ?
    this is due to the presence of additional atoms
    in the unit cell.
  • The reflections present and the missing
    reflections due to additional atoms in the unit
    cell are listed in the table below.

Bravais Lattice Reflections which may be present Reflections necessarily absent
Simple all None
Body centred (h k l) even (h k l) odd
Face centred h, k and l unmixed h, k and l mixed
End centred (C centred) h and k unmixed h and k mixed
Bravais Lattice Allowed Reflections
SC All
BCC (h k l) even
FCC h, k and l unmixed
DC h, k and l are all odd or all are even (h k l) divisible by 4
25
h2 k2 l2 SC FCC BCC DC
1 100
2 110 110
3 111 111 111
4 200 200 200
5 210
6 211 211
7
8 220 220 220 220
9 300, 221
10 310 310
11 311 311 311
12 222 222 222
13 320
14 321 321
15
16 400 400 400 400
17 410, 322
18 411, 330 411, 330
19 331 331 331
Allowed reflections in SC, FCC, BCC DC
crystals
lattice decorated with monoatomic/monoionic
motif
26
The ratio of (h2 k2 l2) derived from
extinction rules As we shall see soon the ratios
of (h2 k2 l2) is proportional to Sin2? ?
which can be used in the determination of the
lattice type
SC 1 2 3 4 5 6 8
BCC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
FCC 3 4 8 11 12
DC 3 8 11 16
27
Crystal structure determination
  • As diffraction occurs only at specific Bragg
    angles, the chance that a reflection is observed
    when a crystal is irradiated with monochromatic
    X-rays at a particular angle is small (added to
    this the diffracted intensity is a small fraction
    of the beam used for irradiation).
  • The probability to get a diffracted beam (with
    sufficient intensity) is increased by either
    varying the wavelength (?) or having many
    orientations (rotating the crystal or having
    multiple crystallites in many orientations).
  • The three methods used to achieve high
    probability of diffraction are shown below.

Many ?s (orientations) Powder specimen
POWDER METHOD
Monochromatic X-rays
Single ?
LAUETECHNIQUE
Panchromatic X-rays
ROTATINGCRYSTALMETHOD
? Varied by rotation
Monochromatic X-rays
Only the powder method (which is commonly used in
materials science) will be considered in this
text.
28
THE POWDER METHOD
  • In the powder method the specimen has
    crystallites (or grains) in many orientations
    (usually random).
  • Monochromatic X-rays are irradiated on the
    specimen and the intensity of the diffracted
    beams is measured as a function of the diffracted
    angle.
  • In this elementary text we shall consider cubic
    crystals.

Cubic crystal
(2)
(1)
(2) in (1)
?
?
In reality this is true only to an extent
29
POWDER METHOD
  • In the powder sample there are crystallites in
    different random orientations (a
    polycrystalline sample too has grains in
    different orientations)
  • The coherent x-ray beam is diffracted by these
    crystallites at various angles to the incident
    direction
  • All the diffracted beams (called reflections)
    from a single plane, but from different
    crystallites lie on a cone.
  • Depending on the angle there are forward and back
    reflection cones.
  • A diffractometer can record the angle of these
    reflections along with the intensities of the
    reflection
  • The X-ray source and diffractometer move in arcs
    of a circle- maintaining the Bragg reflection
    geometry as in the figure (right)

Different cones for different reflections
30
How to visualize the occurrence of peaks at
various angles
It is somewhat difficult to actually visualize
a random assembly of crystallites giving peaks at
various angels in a XRD scan. The figures below
are expected to give a visual feel for the
same. Hypothetical crystal with a 4Å is
assumed with ?1.54Å. Only planes of the type xx0
(like (100,110)are considered.
The sample is not rotating only the source and
detector move in arcs of a circle
Random assemblage of crystallites in a material
As the scan takes place at increasing angles,
planes with suitable d, which diffract are
picked out from favourably oriented crystallites
?h2 hkl d Sin(q) q
1 100 4.00 0.19 11.10
2 110 2.83 0.27 15.80
3 111 2.31 0.33 19.48
4 200 2.00 0.39 22.64
5 210 1.79 0.43 25.50
6 211 1.63 0.47 28.13
8 220 1.41 0.54 32.99
9 300 1.33 0.58 35.27
10 310 1.26 0.61 37.50
31
Determination of Crystal Structure from 2? versus
Intensity Data in Powder Method
  • In the power diffraction method a 2? versus
    intensity (I) plot is obtained from the
    diffractometer (and associated instrumentation)
  • The intensity is relative intensity and is
    the area under the peak in such a plot (NOT the
    height of the peak)? I is really diffracted
    energy (as Intensity is Energy/area/time)
  • A table is prepared as in the next slide to
    tabulate the data and make calculations to find
    the crystal structure (restricting ourselves to
    cubic crystals for the present)

Powder diffraction pattern from Al
Radiation Cu K?, ? 1.54 Å
Increasing d
Increasing ?
32
Determination of Crystal Structure from 2? versus
Intensity Data
The following table is made from the 2? versus
Intensity data (obtained from a XRD experiment on
a powder sample (empty starting table of columns
is shown below- completed table shown later).
n 2?? ? Intensity Sin? Sin2 ? ratio





33
Powder diffraction pattern from Al
Radiation Cu K?, ? 1.54 Å
  • Note
  • This is a schematic pattern
  • In real patterns peaks or not idealized ? peaks ?
    broadened
  • Increasing splitting of peaks with ?g ?(?1 ?2
    peaks get resolved in the high angle peaks)
  • Peaks are all not of same intensity
  • No brackets are used around the indexed
    numbers(the peaks correspond to planes in the
    real space)

34
Radiation Cu K?, ? 1.54 Å
Powder diffraction pattern from Al
  • Note
  • Peaks or not idealized ? peaks ? broadened
  • Increasing splitting of peaks with ?g ?
  • Peaks are all not of same intensity

111
200
220
311
222
400
K?1 K?2 peaks resolved in high angle peaks(in
222 and 400 peaks this can be seen)
In low angle peaks K?1 K?2 peaks merged
35
Funda Check
How are real diffraction patterns different from
the ideal computed ones?
  • We have seen real and ideal diffraction patterns.
    In ideal patterns the peaks are ? functions.
  • Real diffraction patterns are different from
    ideal ones in the following ways? Peaks are
    broadened (could be due to instrumental,
    residual non-uniform strain, grain size etc.
    broadening)? Peaks could be shifted from their
    ideal positions (could be due to uniform
    strain)? Relative intensities of the peaks could
    be altered (could be due to texture in the
    sample)

Funda Check
What is the maximum value of ? possible?
Ans 90?
  • At ? 90? the reflected ray is opposite in
    direction to the incident ray.
  • Beyond this angle, it is as if the source and
    detector positions are switched.
  • ? 2?max is 180?.

36
Solved example
Determination of Crystal Structure (lattice type)
from 2? versus Intensity Data
1
Let us assume that we have the 2? versus
intensity plot from a diffractometer ? To know
the lattice type we need only the position of the
peaks (as tabulated below)
2? ? Sin? Sin2 ? ratio Index d
1 38.52 19.26 0.33 0.11 3 111 2.34
2 44.76 22.38 0.38 0.14 4 200 2.03
3 65.14 32.57 0.54 0.29 8 220 1.43
4 78.26 39.13 0.63 0.40 11 311 1.22
5 82.47 41.235 0.66 0.43 12 222 1.17
6 99.11 49.555 0.76 0.58 16 400 1.01
7 112.03 56.015 0.83 0.69 19 331 0.93
8 116.60 58.3 0.85 0.72 20 420 0.91
9 137.47 68.735 0.93 0.87 24 422 0.83
10 163.78 81.89 0.99 0.98 27 333 0.78
Note that Sin? cannot be gt 1
Note
From the ratios in column 6 we conclude that
FCC
Using
We can get the lattice parameter ? which
correspond to that for Al
Note Error in d spacing decreases with ? ? so we
should use high angle lines for lattice parameter
calculation
Click here to know more
XRD_lattice_parameter_calculation.ppt
37
Solved example
2
Another example Given the positions of the Bragg
peaks we find the lattice type
2?? ? Sin? Sin2 ? Ratiosof Sin2? Whole number ratios
1 21.5 0.366 0.134 1 3
2 25 0.422 0.178 1.33 4
3 37 0.60 0.362 2.66 8
4 45 0.707 0.500 3.66 11
5 47 0.731 0.535 4 12
6 58 0.848 0.719 5.33 16
7 68 0.927 0.859 6.33 19
FCC
38
Comparison of diffraction patterns of SC, BCC
B2 structures
Click here
More Solved Examples on XRD
Click here
39
What happens when we increase or decrease ??
Funda Check
We had pointed out that ? a is preferred for
diffraction. Let us see what happens if we
drastically increase or decrease ?.
If we make ? small? all the peaks get crowded to
small angles
If we double ? ? we get too few peaks
With CuK? ? 1.54 Å
40
Applications of XRD
Bravais lattice determination
We have already seen these applications
Lattice parameter determination
Determination of solvus line in phase diagrams
Long range order
Crystallite size and Strain
Click here to know more
Next slide
Determine if the material is amorphous or
crystalline
41
Crystal
Schematic of difference between the diffraction
patterns of various phases
Intensity ?
Sharp peaks
90
0
180
Diffraction angle (2?) ?
Monoatomic gas
No peak
Intensity ?
Diffraction angle (2?) ?
Diffraction angle (2?) ?
Liquid / Amorphous solid
180
Intensity ?
90
0
Diffuse Peak
0
90
180
42
Actual diffraction pattern from an amorphous solid
Diffuse peak from Cu-Zr-Ni-Al-Si Metallic glass
  • Note
  • Sharp peaks are missing
  • Broad diffuse peak survives ? the peak
    corresponds to the average spacing between atoms
    which the diffraction experiment picks out

(XRD patterns) courtesy Dr. Kallol Mondal, MSE,
IITK
43
Funda Check
  • What is the minimum spacing between planes
    possible in a crystal?
  • How many diffraction peaks can we get from a
    powder pattern?

Let us consider a cubic crystal (without loss in
generality)
As h,k, l increases, d decreases ? we could
have planes with infinitesimal spacing
The number of peaks we obtain in a powder
diffraction pattern depends on the wavelength of
x-ray we are using. Planes with d lt ?/2 are not
captured in the diffraction pattern. These peaks
with small d occur at high angles in
diffraction pattern.
With increasing indices the interplanar spacing
decreases
44
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com