Title: The CRPA
1The CRPA An Effective Aid in Cross-Border
Restructurings?
- The recent case of SK Global
- (now called SK Networks)
- Edward Cairns White Case LLP
- 12th November 2003
2The CRPA Process
- What is it?
- The CRPA is an out of court restructuring
process available in Korea pursuant to a
legislative framework (i.e. the Corporate
Restructuring Promotion Act of 14 August 2001) - The legislation is new effective from 15
September 2001 - Has a limited lifespan it is due to expire on
31 December 2005 - Companies to have debt owing of KRW50 billion
(about USD40m) - Covers Korean financial institutions, including
branches of foreign banks in Korea - The largest creditor bank is responsible for
leading the restructuring - A 3 month moratorium is imposed on CRPA creditors
(extendable for one month only) - Lead Bank determines if a restructuring is
appropriate, and has responsibility for
developing the restructuring plan - Restructuring plan requires 75 approval in value
of CRPA creditors to be passed dissenting CRPA
creditors can opt out and seek a cash buy-out
as an alternative
3SK GLOBAL
- A brief corporate history..
- SK Global was founded in 1953 as Sunkyong
Textiles, a producer of woven textiles - In 1980, Yukong Limited (formerly known as Korea
Oil Corporation) was acquired now known as SK
Corporation (SK Corp) - In 1991, Daehan Telecom Limited was founded and
merged with Korea Mobile Telecom in 1997 to
become SK Telecom telecommunications became a
key focus - In 1998, the Sunkyong Group was re-branded and
became the SK Group, South Koreas 4th largest
chaebol - In 1999, in a reorganisation of the Group, SK
Corp became the effective holding Co. - The SK Group was involved in over 2,000 products
from textiles and clothing to petrochemicals,
telecommunications and various commodities - SK Globals main business activities were as a
Global Trading Co. and Energy Sales. Heavily
dependent on trading with its affiliates - SK Global has now changed its name to SK Networks
and will focus on the provision of
telecommunications products (primarily fixed line
services for SK Telecom)
4The Warning Signs
November 2002
- SK Global fined for irregular option trades with
JP Morgan
- Commencement of investigation by Seoul District
Prosecutors Office - Arrest of the Chairman of SK Corp, Chey Tae-won,
with respect to suspicious stock deals
February 2003
- SK Global share price fell 40
Late February/Early March
- The Chairman of SK Global, Son Kil-seung, is
summonsed by prosecutors with respect to their
investigation
Early March
- Accounting irregularities announced totalling
KRW1,559 billion (USD1.3 billion)
11 March
- Hana Bank calls meeting under Corporate
Restructuring Promotion Act (CRPA) at the
request of the FSS to implement a standstill
12 March
- Korean Banks vote to commence CRPA
- 3 month standstill period commences, effective
from 11/3/03
19 March
5Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis
- Reforms were introduced emphasising transparency
and focus on core businesses the chaebol were
required to reduce cross-holdings and support for
unprofitable affiliates - The SK Group was not as diversified as other
chaebol that collapsed such as Daewoo and Hyundai
but it did not learn from the mistakes of these
groups - The SK Group was to reduce the affiliates from 45
to 10 by Dec 1999 it retained 41 and by Dec
2002 it had 62 as it expanded and diversified
rather than focused on core businesses - The Government failed to monitor the activities
of the chaebol as the Korean economy appeared to
recover - Many examples of SK Group raising capital and
using funds to support, maintain or strengthen
control over other affiliates SK Global was a
de facto waste bin
6The Balance Sheet
- Balance Sheet Position Published Consolidated
- SK Global (unconsolidated) 2002 balance sheet was
amended following due diligence performed after
11 March 2003 (commencement date of CRPA) as
follows
2001 (USDm) 2002 (USDm)
Current Assets 1,995 1,447
Non Current Assets 3,419 3,089
Total Assets 5,414 4,536
Current Liabilities 3,817 3,559
Non Current Liabilities 1,049 1,246
Total Liabilities 4,866 4,805
Equity (Consolidated) 548 (269)
USDm
Equity before due diligence (133)
Net due diligence adjustments (3,522)
Equity after due diligence (3,655)
7The Debt Picture
- Level of Debt
- The extent of financial institution debt as at 11
March 2003 can be shown as follows - Virtually all subsidiary debt was subject to
guarantees from the parent - It is significant that the majority of Foreign
Bank debt was to offshore subsidiaries and not
subject to the CRPA process in Korea - Korean Banks held the balance of debt in the
Subsidiaries -
Korean Banks and Institutions No. 93 USDm Foreign Banks No.48 USDm
SK Global (parent) 4,429.1 96.3
Subsidiaries (based outside Korea) 952.2 803.3
Total 5,381.3 85.7 899.6 14.3
8Early Stages of the Restructure
- The Tokyo Meeting
- Foreign Banks met on 8 April 2003 in Tokyo
- SKG requested an informal stand still whilst the
restructuring plan was prepared - A Foreign Bank Steering Committee (FBSC) was
formed, representing 9 banks Standard Chartered
Bank was appointed as the lead bank - Foreign Banks were promised a world class
restructuring based on international standards
with full transparency and equality of treatment
for creditors in similar classes - Actions of the FBSC
- FBSC protected the SKG Group from hostile actions
taken by some banks to preserve the status quo
for the benefit of all Foreign Banks - FBSC commenced a dialogue with Hana Bank and its
advisors - Ferrier Hodgson was engaged as financial advisor
to the FBSC - White Case was engaged as legal counsel to the
FBSC -
9Early Stages of the Restructure
- The Samil Report
- Samil Accounting Corporation (Samil) was
engaged by SKG / Hana to prepare the
following - A Due Diligence Report and liquidation analysis
- Document the restructuring plan
- Prepare an analysis of SKGs new Business Plan
- Foreign Banks were put into a holding pattern
pending agreeing to a restructuring plan with
Korean Banks - At this stage, the FBSC maintained the position
that they required payment of 100 of their debt
or a full forensic review to explain the losses - Whilst these reports and analyses satisfied the
terms of the mandate set by the domestic
creditors, they did not provide the Foreign Banks
with adequate transparency
10The CRPA Plan
- Negotiation of the CRPA Plan
- Hana Bank focused on negotiating the CRPA Plan
for the Korean creditors - Hana Bank had
- to satisfy the Korean Banks
- have SK Corp contribute to the plan and
- provide SK Global with a viable future
- SK Corp
- SK Corp was the effective holding company of SK
Global and was owed about KRW1.5 trillion
(USD1.25 bn) with respect to trading between the
two entities - But no cross guarantees
- SK Corp required to swap a debt for equity the
key issues faced were - SK Corp wanted to keep the swap amount low
- Hana Bank needed the swap high to improve SK
Globals balance sheet and reduce the haircut for
the Korean Banks - Pressure from Korean Banks for an acceptable
restructuring plan
11The CRPA Plan
- SK Corp was under pressure from shareholders,
particularly Sovereign Asset Management (SAM)
with a 14.99 holding - SK Corp also under pressure from trade unions and
other interest groups - SAM / foreign investors opposed any contribution
by SK Corp to bailout SK Global - Negotiations pushed the entire restructure to the
brink of Court Receivership in early June - What Was Agreed?
- At the 11th hour SK Corp agreed to a debt for
equity swap of KRW850 billion (SAM continues to
oppose) - Korean Banks agreed to a combination of the
following - A Cash Buy Out (CBO) at 30
- 3 types of debt for equity swaps waterfall
depending on the extent of CBO taken - Residual debt to be paid after 31/12/07 subject
to available cash - The plan was dependent on reaching satisfactory
agreement with the Foreign Banks
12The CRPA Plan
- The Effect on SKGs Balance Sheet
- Subject to compromise of guaranteed debt (will
increase the surplus) - Total CRPA debt is treated as follows
- 44 is swapped for equity
- 33 is applied to the CBO
- 23 of debt remains on the balance sheet (subject
to restrictions on repayment)
(Deficiency)/Surplus KRWb
Deficiency per Due Diligence (4,387)
Common stock debt for equity swap SK Corp 850
Common stock debt for equity swap CRPA creditors 850
Profit on CBO i.e. after payment of 30 of debt applied 592
Redeemable Preference Shares (cap of KRW1,000bn) 1,000
Mandatory Convertible Bonds (cap of KRW1,065bn) 1,065
Net Profit for 2003 71
Adjusted Surplus (i.e. Net Assets) 41
13Documenting the Offer
- After the CRPA Plan was agreed, attention turned
to dealing with the Foreign Banks - After several weeks of sometimes difficult
negotiations, a deal was struck - Basic term sheet within 12 hours of negotiated
deal - 3 weeks then spent negotiating a detailed term
sheet - points were very difficult to resolve - Detailed agreements drafted
- The timeline required by the CRPA Plan was
unrealistic and resulted in - The first draft of the Exchange Agreement and
related documents being provided 30 August - Drafts still materially incomplete and with term
sheet issues outstanding - All 48 Foreign Banks being required to sign the
documents by mid-September - Substantial work was performed in a very short
period of time to finalise the documents and
present them to the Foreign Banks for signing - But signing was achieved as required in
mid-September
14The Outcome
- The Foreign Banks achieved..
- A fully secured return of 48 by way of
- Promissory Notes (43) repayable in full by end
2004 - Bonds (5) repayable in early 2008
- 115 collateral cover over listed shares / cash
- Warrants to enable participation in equity upside
- Acceptance by 95.8 of Foreign Banks only 2
Foreign Banks chose not to participate - Closing as planned at end October 2003
- SK Networks has a viable future (dependent on
trading with its affiliates) - The alternative was Court Receivership and
Worldwide insolvency proceedings - yielding less
than 20 cents and could have taken years.
15Court Receivership
- The prospect of Court Receivership was real a
possibility - The Court Receivership was to be conducted as
follows - a Pre-Packaged proposal would be presented to the
Court incorporating the majority of the terms of
the CRPA Plan - It would be supervised by the Court and therefore
the CBO was not certain (in order to conserve
SKGs cash/assets) - It would pay only 9 over 9 years on the
shortfall of guarantee claims interest free
(subject to Court approval) making the
guarantees worthless
16The Verdict?
- Was the CRPA an effective aid in achieving the
restructuring of SK Global? - Yes but the dynamics in this case were very
singular - If this legislation is renewed on expiry with
more flexibility built in it could be very useful
indeed but its inherent limitations and
rigidity will handicap its future usefulness to
Korean companies with large overseas borrowings