Introductory concepts: Atomic and molecular orbitals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Introductory concepts: Atomic and molecular orbitals

Description:

Introductory concepts: Atomic and molecular orbitals Jon Goss Outline Atomic orbitals (AOs) Linear combinations (LCAO): Hybrids Molecular orbitals (MOs) One-electron ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:281
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: n110
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introductory concepts: Atomic and molecular orbitals


1
Introductory conceptsAtomic and molecular
orbitals
  • Jon Goss

2
Outline
  • Atomic orbitals (AOs)
  • Linear combinations (LCAO)
  • Hybrids
  • Molecular orbitals (MOs)
  • One-electron vs. many-body
  • Charge density and spin density

3
Atomic Orbitals founding principles
  • Electrons are Fermions
  • The are indistinguishable
  • spin-half particles
  • Anti-symmetric wave functions
  • Obey the Pauli exclusion principle
  • (no two electrons can exist in the same quantum
    state)
  • The have mass and charge
  • They move in the potential arising from the
    (point) nucleus and the other electrons in the
    atom.
  • For the hydrogen atom the solutions may be
    obtained analytically.
  • For other atoms, in general this is not (yet)
    possible.

4
Atomic orbitals
  • Electrons in atoms may be characterised by four
    quantum numbers
  • n principal quantum number
  • l orbital angular momentum
  • ms spin magnetic angular momentum
  • ml orbital magnetic quantum number
  • See for example, Atomic Spectra and Atomic
    Structure, Herzberg (Dover Press)
  • In this lecture we are chiefly concerned with
    properties implied by the different values of n
    and l.

5
Atomic orbitals l
  • The orbital angular momentum can take positive
    integer values, but they are commonly expressed
    using letters
  • We can interpret the increase in l in terms of an
    increase in angular nodality.
  • For a given value of l, ml can take any value
    from l to l
  • E.g. l1, ml can be -1, 0 and 1.
  • These are equal in energy orbital degeneracy!

l 0 1 2 3 4
Term s p d f g
ml 0 -1, 0, 1 -2, -1, 0, 1, 2 -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3 -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4
6
Atomic orbitals l, ml
7
Atomic orbitals n
  • The possible values of l are restricted by the
    principal quantum number, n.
  • lltn
  • Thus, for n1, only l0 (s) is allowed.
  • For n2, l can have values 0 and 1 (s and p).
  • and so on
  • Increasing n implies increasing radial nodality

8
Atomic orbitals n, l and ml
9
Atomic orbitals mS
  • The final quantum number is the spin magnetic
    quantum number, which can take two values
  • ms½ and ms-½
  • up and down spins
  • There is no real physical spin in the classical
    sense involved.

10
Pauli exclusion and the build up principles
  • The Pauli exclusion principle states that no two
    electrons may have the same set of quantum
    numbers
  • For atoms, therefore, we have definite groups of
    states (shells) that are incrementally occupied
    with increasing energy
  • 1s up, 1s down (there is only one value of ml)
  • 2s up, 2s down
  • (2p, ml-1, ms½), (2p, ml0, ms½), (2p, ml1,
    ms½), (2p, ml-1, ms-½), (2p, ml0, ms-½),
    (2p, ml1, ms-½)

11
Pauli exclusion and the build up principles
  • H 1s1
  • He 1s2
  • Li 1s22s1
  • Be 1s22s2
  • B 1s22s22p1
  • C 1s22s22p2
  • N 1s22s22p3
  • O 1s22s22p4
  • F 1s22s22p5
  • Ne 1s22s22p6
  • Na (Ne)3s1
  • Mg (Ne)3s2
  • Al (Ne)3s23p1
  • Si (Ne)3s23p2
  • P (Ne)3s23p3
  • S (Ne)3s23p4
  • Cl (Ne)3s23p5
  • Ar (Ne)3s23p6

12
Pauli exclusion and the build up principles
  • Nothing has been said about which ml states are
    involved, although well touch on this in terms
    of the many-body effects.
  • It gets slightly more complicated with we move
    beyond Ar as we begin filling the 4s orbitals
    before the 3d
  • You are referred to any reasonable inorganic
    chemistry text book ?

13
Linear combinations Hybrids
  • In the presence of an applied field (typically as
    a consequence of nearby atoms) the atomic
    orbitals combined together to form hybrids.
  • Some of the best known examples relate to carbon.
  • Graphite sp2.
  • Diamond sp3.
  • In contrast the atomic orbitals, these are formed
    in weighted combinations

14
Linear combinations Hybrids
  • sp2
  • spxpy
  • spx-py
  • s-px-py
  • pz
  • sp3
  • spxpypz
  • s-px-py-pz
  • spx-py-pz
  • s-pxpy-pz

15
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
  • Both atomic orbitals and hybrids centred on
    different atoms combine to form covalent bonds.
  • s-bonds (sigma-bonds) are made up from
    overlapping orbitals directed along the bond
    direction.
  • p-bonds (pi-bonds) are made up from overlapping
    orbitals at an angle to the inter-nuclear
    direction
  • pp bonds are combinations of p-orbitals
    perpendicular to the bond direction
  • pp-d bonds are combinations of p- and d-orbitals
    but not precisely perpendicular to the
    bond-direction

16
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
sp-p anti-bonding combination
17
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
18
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
19
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
pp-bonding combination
20
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
pp anti-bonding combination
21
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
22
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
23
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
pp-d bonding combination
24
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
25
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
26
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
pd-d bonding combination
27
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
pd-d anti-bonding combination
28
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
  • The bonds can be modelled by considering linear
    combinations of the atomic orbitals or atomic
    hybrids
  • This is only a simplification, as we shall see
    when we consider simple many-body concepts.
  • The combinations are dictated by the relative
    energies of the atomic orbitals.
  • A prototypical example is the hydrogen molecule

29
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
Molecule
Energy
Atom
Atom
30
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
  • The same approach can be adopted for defects in
    solid solution
  • The vacancy in diamond
  • Take out an atom and you generate four equivalent
    sp3 dangling-bonds.
  • Well label them a, b, c and d.
  • As in the H2 molecule, we form linear
    combinations of these orbitals to form the
    molecular orbitals for the four together
  • (abcd) the bonding combination
  • (abc-dab-cda-bcd) a triply degenerate
    combinations involving some anti-bonding
    character.
  • Hood et al PRL 91, 076403 (2003).

31
Linear combinations Molecular Orbitals
  • What happens when the originating orbitals are
    inequivalent?

32
One-electron vs. many-body
  • Remember that electrons are indistinguishable
    particles, so the molecular and atomic orbitals
    are models for the electrons in real compound
    systems
  • A more precise description of the electronic
    states must be a function of the positions of all
    the electrons in the system.
  • This is the many-electron wave function of an
    atom, molecule, defect
  • As an example, lets look back at one of the atoms

33
One-electron vs. many-body Nitrogen
  • Nitrogen atoms have the electronic configurations
    1s22s22p3
  • What does this mean in terms of the properties of
    the atom?
  • Note, for weak spin-orbit coupling, the electron
    spins combine to give the total effective spin,
    S.
  • What is the spin state of a nitrogen atom?

34
One-electron vs. many-body Nitrogen
  • The spins in the 1s and 2s are pairs with ms½
    and ms-½, yielding no net spin from these shells
    (S0).
  • We have three electrons in the n2, l1 states
    with ml1,0,-1, ms½.
  • Which one combinations are involved?
  • It can be shown that there are exactly three ways
    to combine the electrons
  • Two have S1/2, one has S3/2.
  • The combinations also yield effective orbital
    angular momenta, which in the many-body sense are
    labeled using upper case terms (S, P, D, F, G, )
  • Do not confuse the total electron spin and the S
    orbital angular momentum term.
  • The two S1/2 combinations are P and D, whereas
    S3/2 yields S.
  • We write 2P, 2D and 4S, where the leading
    numerical value indicates the multiplicity of the
    state and is given by (2S1).

35
One-electron vs. many-body
  • Does this make any difference?
  • Obviously the answer must be yes, otherwise I
    would not have tortured you with the preceding
    analysis
  • Spin selection rules for optical spectra (?S0)
  • Spin state (magnetism, ESR, )
  • Orbital angular momentum selection rules in
    optical spectra (?L1)
  • Jahn-Teller effects apply to many-body states

36
One-electron states vs. electron density
  • Experimentally observed properties may depend
    more or less on the many-body effects, with some
    accessible from the frontier orbitals alone
  • Optical selection rules for
  • orbitally non-degenerate one-electron states?
  • orbitally degenerate one-electron states?
  • ESR?
  • Bond strengths?
  • Reactive sites?

37
One-electron states vs. electron density
  • Example of H/µ in diamond.
  • There are two main forms of this centre
  • Normal muonium a non-bonded site
  • Anomalous muonium residing in the centre of a
    carbon-carbon bond.
  • In the overall neutral charge state there are an
    odd number of electrons and therefore the net
    electron spin allows for access of these centres
    in ESR-like experiments.
  • The interaction of the electron spin and the
    nuclear spin of H (or muonium) can be determined
    theoretically by analysis of the spin-density at
    the nucleus.
  • The question is, how well is the spin density
    represented by the unpaired one-electron state?

38
One-electron states vs. electron density
  • The answer is that qualitatively the correct kind
    of answer can be obtained for normal muonium, but
    not for anomalous muonium.
  • The unpaired electron (the state in the band-gap)
    is centred on the muon for the normal form,
    giving a large isotropic hyperfine interaction.
    There will also be a contribution from the
    polarisation of the valence states, but this is
    probably not the dominant term.
  • The unpaired electron in the bond-centre is nodal
    at the muonium, so there should be zero isotropic
    hyperfine interaction in this form, but this is
    not the case for the bond-centre, the isotropic
    contribution to the hyperfine interaction arises
    purely from the polarization of the valence
    density due to the unequal spin up and spin down
    populations,

39
Bond-centred muonium
sp3
1s
sp3
40
Bond-centred muonium
B
C
A
41
Bond-centred muonium
AB-C
Ec
A-B
Ev
ABC
Note, we are choosing to ignore most of the
electrons in the system
42
Bond-centred muonium
AB-C
Ec
A-B
Ev
ABC
Note, we are choosing to ignore most of the
electrons in the system
43
Bond-centred muonium
AB-C
Ec
A-B
Ev
ABC
Note, we are choosing to ignore most of the
electrons in the system
44
  • In this simplified model, the experiment can be
    qualitatively explained
  • the isotropic part of the hyperfine comes from
    the small differences between spin up and spin
    down states ABC
  • This is spin polarization in action!
  • For an accurate facsimile of the experiment, you
    must include the polarisation of all the
    electrons in your system.

45
Summary
  • Atomic and molecular orbital theory is a powerful
    tool for simplified, but highly illustrative
    explanations of a wide range of materials
    properties.
  • However, it must always be remembered that it is
    only a simplified model!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com