Background on ABET - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Background on ABET

Description:

Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part I Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure What are ABET & EC 2000? Accreditation Board for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:123
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: Gusta55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Background on ABET


1
Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000
Part I
  • Background on ABET
  • Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure

2
What are ABET EC 2000?
  • Accreditation Board for Engineering and
    Technology
  • EC2000 - Criteria for Evaluating Engineering and
    Engineering Technology Programs
  • Web Source - http//www.abet.org/

3
What are ABET EC 2000?
  • Primary organization responsible for monitoring,
    evaluating, and certifying the quality of
    engineering, engineering technology, and
    engineering related education in the U.S.
  • Recognized by the U.S. Dept. of Education
  • Federation of 28 professional technical
    societies representing over 1.8 million
    practicing engineering professionals

4
Vision
  • ABET will provide world leadership to assure
    quality and stimulate innovation in engineering,
    technology and applied science education.

5
Mission
  • ABET serves the public through the promotion and
    advancement of education in applied science,
    computing, engineering and technology.

6
Mission
  • ABET will
  • Accredit educational programs
  • Promote quality and innovation in education
  • Consult and assist in the development and
    advancement of education worldwide in a
    financially self-sustaining manner
  • Communicate with our constituencies and the
    public regarding activities and accomplishments
  • Anticipate and prepare for the changing
    environment and the future needs of
    constituencies
  • Manage the operations and resources to be
    effective and fiscally responsible

7
Accreditation Objectives
  • Serve the public, industry, and the profession by
    stimulating the development of improved
    engineering education
  • Encourage new and innovative approaches to
    engineering education
  • Assure that graduates of an accredited program
    are adequately prepared to enter and continue the
    practice of engineering
  • Identify programs that meet the ABET criteria for
    accreditation

8
ABET Today (1999 data)
  • 1555 accredited engineering programs at 323
    institutions
  • 729 accredited engineering technology programs at
    242 institutions
  • 53 accredited related-engineering programs at 37
    institutions
  • Staff of 19
  • Home Page on the World Wide Web
  • http//www.abet.org

9
(No Transcript)
10
What does ABET accredit?
  • ABET accredits programs of study that lead to
    degrees in engineering
  • ABET does not accredit departments, colleges,
    degrees, or institutions

11
ABET EC 2000
Old
New
  • Input Accounting
  • Focus on having the right courses
  • Every six years get information ready for review
  • Outcomes Assessment EC 2000
  • Focus on graduates and programs components
  • Continuous assessment

vs
12
Engineering Criteria 2000
Philosophy Emphasis
13
Philosophy
  • Institutions and Programs define mission and
    objectives to meet needs of constituencies
    enable program differentiation
  • Emphasis on outcomes preparation for
    professional practice
  • Curricular requirements limited to 3 years
  • Programs demonstrate how criteria and educational
    objectives are being met

14
Emphasis
  • Practice of continuous improvement
  • Input of Constituencies
  • Process focus
  • Outcomes and Assessment linked to Objectives
  • Knowledge required for entry to the engineering
    profession
  • Student, Faculty, Facilities, Institutional
    Support and Financial Resource issues linked to
    Program Objectives

15
Evaluation Assessment CyclesA 2-loop Process
Determine Outcomes Required to Achieve Objectives
Determine How Outcomes will be Achieved
Assess Outcomes/ Evaluate Objectives
Input from Constituencies
Establish Indicators for Outcomes to Lead to
Achievement of Objectives
16
Process Perspective for Evaluation and
Improvement OSU Version
17
8 Basic Level Accreditation Criteria
  • 1. Students
  • 2. Program Educational Objectives
  • 3. Program Outcomes and Assessment
  • 4. Professional Components
  • 5. Faculty
  • 6. Facilities
  • 7. Institutional Support and
  • Financial Resources
  • 8. Program Criteria

Resource Process
18
Outcomes (a - k) Criterion 3
  • Engineering programs must demonstrate that their
    graduates have
  • a. An ability to apply knowledge of
    mathematics, science and engineering appropriate
    to the discipline
  • b. An ability to design and conduct experiments,
    analyze and interpret data
  • c. An ability to design a system, component, or
    process to meet desired needs

19
Outcomes (a - k) Criterion 3
  • d. An ability to function on multi-disciplinary
    teams
  • e. An ability to identify, formulate and solve
    engineering problems
  • f. An understanding of professional and ethical
    responsibility
  • g. An ability to communicate effectively

20
Outcomes (a - k) Criterion 3
  • h. The broad education necessary to understand
    the impact of engineering solutions in a societal
    context
  • i. A recognition of the need for, and an ability
    to engage in life-long learning
  • j. A knowledge of contemporary issues
  • k. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and
    modern engineering tools necessary for
    engineering practice

21
Educational Objectives Criterion 2
  • Development Process to include inputs gained from
    Constituencies
  • Advisory Groups
  • Students
  • All faculty
  • Alumni
  • Industry

22
Chemical Engineering Example
  • 1. Provide chemical engineers with the tools
    required to meet the technological challenges of
    the future.
  • 2. Educate chemical engineers to understand and
    properly address the impact of technology in
    other areas, and to work effectively in
    interdisciplinary teams with other engineers,
    scientists, and non-technical personnel.
  • 3. Provide chemical engineers with the ability to
    integrate material learned from different sources
    and to apply state-of-the-art technologies to
    identify and solve problems.
  • 4. Instill students with the desire to engage in
    life-long learning and provide them with the
    ability to succeed in this endeavor.

23
Mechanical Engineering Example
  • 1. Our program will prepare students for
    successful careers, for graduate or professional
    studies, and for life-long learning
  • 2. Our students will learn the fundamental tool
    of mechanical engineering analysis, will be
    trained in mathematical and computational methods
    of analysis, and will acquire engineering problem
    solving skills.
  • 3. Our students will develop skills pertinent to
    the design process, including the ability to
    formulate problems, to analyze and synthesize
    information, to think creatively, to make
    informed decisions, to communicate effectively,
    and to work collaboratively.

24
Mechanical Engineering Example
  • 4. Our students will learn to use current
    experimental and data analysis techniques for
    engineering.
  • 5. Our students will understand the function of
    engineering in solving societal problems and
    their professional and ethical responsibilities.

25
Example ME Matrix Cross-check
26
Basic Level Accreditation Criteria
  • Process 2. Program Educational Objectives
  • 3. Program Outcomes and Assessment
  • Resource 1. Students
  • 4. Professional Components
  • 5. Faculty
  • 6. Facilities
  • 7. Institutional Support and
  • Financial Resources
  • 8. Program Criteria

27
Professional Component Criterion 4
  • Faculty must assure curriculum devotes adequate
    attention and time to each component, consistent
    with objectives of the program and institution
  • Preparation for engineering practice
  • Major design experience
  • Subject areas appropriate to engineering

28
Professional Component Criterion 4
  • Major Design Experience
  • A culminating experience, based on knowledge and
    skills acquired in earlier coursework
  • Must incorporate engineering standards and
    realistic constraints, including most of the
    following considerations
  • Economic
  • Environmental
  • Sustainability
  • Manufacturability
  • Ethical
  • Health and Safety
  • Social
  • Political

29
Professional Component Criterion 4
  • Subject Areas
  • One year of a combination of college level
    mathematics and basic sciences (some with
    experimental experience) appropriate to the
    discipline
  • One and one-half years of engineering topics, to
    include engineering sciences and engineering
    design appropriate to the students field of
    study
  • A General Education component that complements
    the technical content of the curriculum and is
    consistent with the program and institution
    objectives

30
Faculty Criterion 5
  • Sufficient number
  • Adequate levels of student-faculty interaction
  • Student advising and counseling
  • University service activities
  • Industry interaction
  • Professional development
  • Competent to cover all curricular areas of
    program
  • Ensure proper guidance of the program, its
    evaluation and development

31
Facilities Criterion 6
  • Must provide opportunities for students to learn
    use of modern engineering tools
  • Classrooms, laboratories and equipment must be
    adequate to
  • Accomplish program objectives
  • Foster faculty-student interaction
  • Encourage professional development
  • Computing and information infrastructure must be
    adequate to support
  • Scholarly activities of students and faculty
  • Educational objectives

32
Institutional Support andFinancial Resources
Criterion 7
  • Constructive Leadership
  • Financial Resources
  • Sufficient to acquire, maintain and operate
    facilities
  • Sufficient to attract, retain, and provide for
    continued professional development of faculty
  • Technical and Clerical Services

33
Program Criteria Criterion 8
  • Each program must satisfy applicable Program
    Criteria
  • Curricula topics
  • Faculty qualifications
  • Current Program Criteria are on the ABET server
    on the World Wide Web
  • http//www.abet.org/criteria.html
  • Must satisfy all Program Criteria implied by
    title of program

34
Process Perspective for Evaluation Improvement
- The OSU Approach
35
Inputs Suggested
  • Exit Survey of all Graduating Seniors
  • Monitoring of Professional Exam Results
  • Monitoring of Student Progress
  • Survey of alumni (2nd, 6th and 15th)

36
Survey Elements for Seniors and Alumni
  1. Educational Outcomes General Focus on ABET EC
    2000 Criterion and Program Outcomes
  2. Educational Experience Quality of Instruction
    at The Ohio State University
  3. Program Specific Questions Focus on ABET EC2000
    Criterion 2 and Program Specific Objectives
  4. Additional Comments and Suggestions
  5. Background/Demographic Information

37
Educational Outcomes Summary
38
Resource Perspective
Educational Experience
Alumni
1. Students
4. 8. Curriculum
6. Facilities
5. Faculty
7. Support
39
Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000
Part I
  • Detailed Example for Ohio State Provided in ABET
    II
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com