Aseptic Non-Union - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 129
About This Presentation
Title:

Aseptic Non-Union

Description:

... for a normal bone healing Aseptic Non Union Anatomic reduction of articular fractures Good alignment of diaphyseal fractures Stable ... Distal femur non ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:307
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 130
Provided by: EnriqueQu2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aseptic Non-Union


1
Aseptic Non-Union

2
AO Principles Course
Dr. Enrique Queipo de Llano Hospital
Universitario de Málaga
3
Definition
  • No bone healing in the normal time
  • Usually 6 a 8 months

4
Etiology
  • Do not blame the osteoblasts (Watson Jones).
  • Fractures have a spontaneous tendency to heal.
    (Merle DAubigne).
  • Delayed or non-union is often multifactorial in
    nature.

5
Etiology
  • Disturbed vascularity and instability are the
    most important factors leading to a non-union.

6
Etiology (Vascularisation)
  • Biological
  • Carpal scaphoid
  • Neck of the femur
  • Talus
  • Devitalized fragments

7
Etiology (Instability)
  • Iatrogenic
  • Insufficient orthopaedic treatment
  • Incorrect osteosynthesis (unstable)

8
Conditions for a normal bone healing
Orthopaedic treatment
  • Good reduction
  • Contact between fragments
  • Strict immobilization

9
Conditions for a normal bone healing
Surgical treatment
  • Anatomic reduction of articular fractures
  • Good alignment of diaphyseal fractures
  • Stable osteosynthesis
  • Absolute asepsis

10
Non compliant patient
  • The care plan has to be compatible with the
    patients personality and life style.
  • Have to be controlled
  • Inappropriate weight bearing
  • Smoking habit
  • Improper diet
  • Other shortcomings in behaviour

11
Symptoms
  • Abnormal mobility
  • Abnormal mobility cannot be seen
  • When there is an Internal Fixation
  • Intramedullary nail
  • Dense fibrous callus
  • Pain and Limp
  • A healed fracture does not hurt

12
Radiology
  • Sometimes difficult to see on the X-Rays
  • Reactive callus Mechanical instability

Slight instability can be positive
13
Delayed union
  • In delayed union there are clinical and
    radiological signs of prolonged fracture healing
  • It is important to establish the diagnosis
  • Fracture instability
  • Implant mobilization
  • To act to achieve a rapid bone healing

14
Judet-Weber classification
  • Vital (Hypervascular)
  • With biological reaction capacity
  • Avital (Avascular)
  • Without biological reaction capacity

15
Judet-Weber classification
  • Vital non-union
  • They do not heal because of instability

16
Judet-Weber classification
  • Avital non-union
  • They do not heal because of biological deficit

17
Weber classification
  • A. Vital
  • I. Hypertrophic non-union (elephant foot)
  • II. Hypertrophic non-union (horse hoof)
  • III. Atrophic non-union (without callus)

18
A. Vital non-union
19
A. Vital non-union
20
Hypertrophic non-union
  • Hypertrophic non-union is frequently localized in
    the lower extremities.
  • Its development largely depends on an impaired
    mechanical stability.

21
Experimental non-union
22
Pathology
23
Pathology
24
Pathology
25
Pathology
26
Bone healing by mechanical stabilization
27
Ca. marked fracture site
28
Ca. marked fracture site
29
Stabilized fracture evolution
  • Mechanical stability allows the fibrous cartilage
    to calcify and finally ossify after vascular
    penetration.
  • Resection of an hypertrophic non-union must be
    regarded as an error.

30
Stabilized fracture evolution
31
Bone healing evolution
32
Bone healing evolution
33
Bone healing evolution
34
Instability (non-union)
PO
35
Stabilization (bone healing)
36
(No Transcript)
37
Weber classification
  • Avital non-union
  • Dystrophic with intermediate wedge fragment
  • Necrotic with conminution
  • Bone loss
  • Atrophic

38
B. Avital non-union
39
Avascular non-union
  • Avascular non-union originates because of the
    devascularisation of the bone fragments adjacent
    to the fracture site due to injury and/or
    surgery.

40
B. Avital non-union
41
Treatment of aseptic non-union
42
Goal of the treatment
  • To achieve a rapid bone healing with complete
    recovery of articular and muscular function.

43
Active treatment
  • To restore bone continuity
  • If possible anatomically
  • To restore articular and muscular function

In the less possible time
44
Treatment according to the type
  • 1. Vital
  • Mechanical stabilization (osteosynthesis)
  • Stable osteosynthesis
  • 2. Avital
  • Mechanical stabilization (osteosynthesis)
  • Biological stimulation (autologous bone grafting)

45
Bone grafting
  • 1. Pediculated vital bone grafts (decortication)
  • 2. Autologous cancellous bone graft
  • 3. Bone transplants

46
Diaphyseal non-union
  • Techniques for bone reconstruction

47
Judet osteoperiosteal decortication
  • It is the simplest and most effective way to
    expose a non union without producing a
    substantial devascularization.
  • This technique is used to enhance the healing
    response, creating a well vascularised that at
    the same time stimulates the bone healing
    process.

48
Osteoperiosteal decortication
49
Osteoperiosteal decortication
50
Autologous cancellous bone graft
  • Cancellous autologous bone graft is the gold
    standard for both biological and mechanical
    purposes.
  • It is osteogenic (a source of vital bone cells)
  • It is osteoinductive (recruitment of local
    mesenchymal cells)
  • It is osteoconductive (scaffold for ingrowth of
    new bone)

51
Autologous cancellous bone graft
52
Autologous cancellous bone graft
53
Bone grafting indications
  • Poor vascularization
  • Minimal callus formation
  • Atrophic non-union

Cancellous autologous bone graft is Osteogenic,
osteoinductive and osteoconductive
54
Allografts and bone graft substitutes
  • Allografts and bone substitutes such as
    demineralized bone matrix, hidroxyapatite,
    tricalcium-phosphate, as welll as osteoinductive
    substances such as growth factors, bone
    morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), etc., are
    currently being intensively explored both
    experimentally and clinically, but have not yet
    proved to be significantly superior.

55
Allografts and bone graft substitutes
  • All these substances require a vital environment
    in order to be effective.
  • In the absence of living cellular elements and
    blood supply there is no possibility of any
    healing.

Nothing is superior to autologous bone graft
56
Callus distractionFree vascularized bone grafts
  • Osteogenesis by callus distraction (Ilizarov) and
    free vascularized bone graft should be taken into
    consideration when dealing with large (gt4-6 cm)
    segmental bone defects.

57
Mechanical stabilization is essential!
58
Stabilization
  • Stabilization of a non-union provides the
    essential mechanical component to allow
    calcification of the fibrous cartilage within the
    non-union.
  • This prepares the field for development of a
    first bony bridge.

59
Types of stabilization
  • Plating
  • Intramedullary nailing
  • External Fixation

60
Plating
  • The plate is probably the most adequate and
    versatile tool for the stabilization of an
    aseptic non-union.
  • It allows in a single procedure
  • Interfragmentary compression
  • Correction of any malposition
  • Reconstructive measures (grafting etc.)

61
Plating techniques
  • Tension band plating (on the convexity)
  • Axial compression plating
  • Buttress plate
  • Lag screws and neutralization plate
  • Bridge plate in segmental bone loss

62
Plating
Optional anterior and posterior decortication
63
Wave plate
Increases the functional diameter of the
non-union site Improves the local
stability Allows placement of autografts all
around the non-union site
64
Intramedullary nailing
  • It is mainly indicated in diaphyseal non-unions
    of the lower extremity
  • Nailing has few advantages in the upper extremity
    and thin unreamed nails are not suitable, as they
    provide insufficient stability.

65
Indications of intramedullary nailing
  • Non displaced mid third femur and tibia non-union
  • Loose or broken nail
  • Over-ream not exposing the non-union site
  • Introduction of a thicker and longer nail
  • Dynamic interlocking (rotational stability)
  • Increase of periosteal bone flow promotes union

66
Intramedullary nailing
67
External Fixation
  • In most aseptic non-unions external fixation
    brings little advantage.
  • It may be applied in the presence of poor
    soft-tissue conditions or in complex multiplanar
    deformities near joints where a single-stage
    correction appears difficult and hazardous.

68
Indications of External Fixation
  • Tibia non-union
  • Poor skin coverage
  • Suspicion of latent infection
  • Shortening with bone loss
  • Callus distraction technique
  • Arthrodesis non-union
  • Failed knee and ankle arthrodesis

69
Methaphyseal non-union
  • Bone reconstruction techniques

70
Metaphyseal non-union
  • Limited local decortication avoiding
    devascularization of the joint fragment,
    correction of the deformities and mechanical
    adaptation of the main fragments with fixation by
    interfragmentary compression.
  • Usually one or two plates are used.
  • Bone grafting may be necessary.

71
Indications
  • Correct alignment of the articular surfaces
  • Articular fragment stable fixation
  • Angle plate
  • Buttress plate
  • Active mobilization of a stiff joint
  • Avoid forced mobilization before bone healing

72
Humerus proximal and distal buttress plates
73
Femur and tibia buttress plates
74
Femur proximal and distal (DCS)
75
Adjuvant treatment
76
Aseptic non-union
  • Electromagnetic stimulation and, more recently,
    ultrasound, have been applied and advocated to
    stimulate bone healing.
  • They do appear to generate a certain physical
    (thermal) effect at the non-union site, but the
    final outcome is still questionable and real
    evidence is lacking.

77
Bone losses
78
Bone transplant
  • 1. Fibula pro tibia
  • 2. Bone transport
  • 3. Free vascularized bone grafts

79
Bone losses (bridging techniques)
  • Bridge plate
  • External Fixator
  • Locked intramedullary nailing

80
Humerus and forearm bone losses
81
Femur bone losses
82
Tibia bone losses
  • Tibio fibular synostosis
  • Fibula pro tibia
  • Bone transport

Plus inter tibio-fibular grafting
83
Tibia bone losses
84
Tibia bone losses
85
Aseptic Non-union Clinical Examples
Aseptic Non Union
86
AO Principles Course
Dr. Enrique Queipo de Llano Hospital
Universitario de Málaga
Aseptic Non Union
87
V.G.C. - 60 year old - Female Distal tibia
non-union - 10-74
  • Distal tibia fracture no-union
  • The fracture was treated in other Hospital
  • Simple screw fixation without IF compression
  • No neutralization plate
  • Lag screw and DCP plating with deformity
    correction
  • Bone healing in 2 months

Aseptic Non Union
88
V.G.C. - 60 y - Female
Aseptic Non Union
89
V.G.C. - 60 y - Female
Aseptic Non Union
90
A.M.C. - 35 year old - FemaleRadius non-union -
11.75
  • Left forearm fracture (radius and ulna)
  • Treated in other Hospital
  • Ulna nailing
  • Plating of the radius with only three screws
  • Treatment
  • Ulna nail removal (ulna fx. was healed)
  • Radius DCP compression plating Bone grafting
  • Bone healing in 3 months

Aseptic Non Union
91
A.M.C. - 35 y - Female
Aseptic Non Union
92
G.G.C. - 52 year old - MaleFemur non-union -
12.76
  • Sub-trochanteric fracture
  • Incomprehensible wiring cerclage
  • Treatment
  • Angle plate (95º) with axial compression fixation
  • Bone grafting
  • Bone healing in 2 months

Aseptic Non Union
93
G.G.C. - 52 y - Male
Aseptic Non Union
94
G.G.C. - 52 y - Male
Aseptic Non Union
95
D.O.J. - 43 year old - MaleDistal femur
non-union - 1.78
  • Distal femur metaphyseal non-union
  • Previous orthopaedic treatment in traction
  • Angle plate (95º) fixation
  • Bone healing in 3 months

Aseptic Non Union
96
D.O.J. - 43 y - Male
Aseptic Non Union
97
D.O.J. - 43 y - Male
Aseptic Non Union
98
D.O.J. - 43 y - Male
Aseptic Non Union
99
P.T.M. 27 year old MaleDistal de tibia
non-union - 5.97
  • Distal de tibia fx. treated in another Hospital
  • UTN nailing
  • Technical defect (only one distal bolt)
  • Non-union with angular deformity
  • Treatment
  • Decortication Osteotomy
  • LC-DCP tibia and fibula plate fixation
  • Excellent result

Aseptic Non Union
100
P.T.M. 27 y Male
Aseptic Non Union
101
P.T.M. 27 y Male
Aseptic Non Union
102
G.B.P. - 14 year old - FemaleFemur diaphysis
non-union - 11.01
  • Motorcycle accident
  • (Right femur and tibia fractures)
  • Treated in another Hospital
  • Kirschner wire nailing of femur and tibia
  • At 6 months post-op
  • Femur angulation with a broken K wire
  • Femoral non-union
  • Tibia fracture was healed

Aseptic Non Union
103
G.B.P. - 14 year old - FemaleFemur diaphysis
non-union - 11.01
  • Surgical treatment
  • Femur and tibia nails removal
  • Decortication LC-DCP axial compression plating
  • Cancellous bone screws were used (osteoporosis)
  • Autologouu bone grafting
  • Excellent result at 12 and 24 months

Aseptic Non Union
104
G.B.P. - 14 year old - Female
Aseptic Non Union
105
G.B.P. - 14 year old - Female
Tibia healed. Decortication, axial compression
plate fixation.
Aseptic Non Union
106
G.B.P. - 14 year old - Female
Aseptic Non Union
107
G.B.P. - 14 year old - Female
Aseptic Non Union
108
G.B.P. - 14 year old - Female
Aseptic Non Union
109
JG.FJ. - 18 year old - MaleMotorcycle accident -
5.5.02
  • Left femur B2.2 fracture
  • Operation 6.5.02
  • UFN locked nailing with satisfactory reduction
  • 9.02 - Small wedge resorption and instability
  • 25.11.02 Operation
  • Decorticatión and LCP fixation without nail
    removal
  • Bone grafting
  • Bone healing in 4 months (10 months since the
    accident)
  • Complete function at 12 months.

Aseptic Non Union
110
JG.FJ. - 18 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
111
JG.FJ. - 18 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
112
JG.FJ. - 18 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
113
JG.FJ. - 18 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
114
JG.FJ. - 18 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
115
L.S.C. - 27 year old - FemaleFemoral non-union -
5.89
  • Right femur transverse fracture
  • Primary reamed IM nailing
  • No callus formation at 15 months
  • Nail failure at 16 months
  • Treatment
  • Nail removal without opening the fracture site
  • New reamed thicker nailing
  • Bone healing in 2 months

Aseptic Non Union
116
L.S.C. - 27 year old - Female
Aseptic Non Union
117
L.S.C. - 27 year old - Female
Aseptic Non Union
118
Fibula pro tibia
Aseptic Non Union
119
P.A.R. - 10 year old - MaleAcute osteomyelitis
secualae - 9.66
  • Diaphyseal segmental bone loss
  • Fibula pro tibia proximal and distal
  • Fibula tibialization
  • Excellent result at 3 years.

Aseptic Non Union
120
P.A.R. - 10 year old - Male
20 m
Aseptic Non Union
121
G.S.A. - 15 year old - MaleRun over by a car
3.97
  • Polytrauma patient
  • Right tibia open IIIB fracture
  • Peroneal muscles and nerve loss
  • Extensive skin loss
  • Immediate External Fixation
  • Dorsalis free vascularized transfer

Aseptic Non Union
122
G.S.A. - 15 year old - MaleRun over by a car
3.97
  • Atrophic proximal tibia aseptic non-union
  • Osteoporotic bone
  • Fibula pro tibia (lateral approach)
  • Medial LC-DCP buttress plate fixation
  • Autologous cancellous bone grafting

Aseptic Non Union
123
G.S.A. - 15 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
124
G.S.A. - 15 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
125
G.S.A. - 15 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
126
G.S.A. - 15 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
127
G.S.A. - 15 year old - Male
Aseptic Non Union
128
G.S.A. - 15 year old - Male
5 years
Aseptic Non Union
129
Aseptic Non Union
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com