ESE and Charter Schools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 66
About This Presentation
Title:

ESE and Charter Schools

Description:

ESE and Charter Schools Adam Miller Office of Independent Education and Parental Choice Thank you Contact Information Adam Miller 850-245-0998 Adam.Miller_at_fldoe.org ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:139
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 67
Provided by: adamm51
Learn more at: https://www.fldoe.org
Category:
Tags: ese | charter | schools

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ESE and Charter Schools


1
ESE and Charter Schools
  • Adam Miller
  • Office of Independent Education and Parental
    Choice

2
Overview
  • Performance Data
  • Needs Assessment Results
  • Rules and Regulations
  • Current Issues

3
Charter School Performance
  • CREDO Report (Florida)
  • Charter students perform at lower level initially
  • Charter students outperform by year 3
  • Issues with methodology
  • RAND Study
  • Charter high schools in Florida, have
    substantial positive effects on both high school
    completion and college attendance.
  • Florida, 57 percent of students attending a
    charter school in grade nine went to either a
    two-year of four-year post secondary institution
    within five years of starting high school
    (compared to 40 percent of students who started
    grade nine in a traditional public school)

4
School Level Data
5
School Level- AYP Comparison
6
FCAT Data- Populations
7
Preliminary 08/09 Data- Florida
  • 63 comparisons
  • Proficiency in Reading, Math, Science
  • Elementary, Middle, High School
  • Total
  • White, African American, Hispanic
  • FRL
  • ESE
  • ELL
  • Higher charter achievement in 53 comparisons

8
ESE Membership Data
9
ESE Density (school level)
10
ESE Density and AYP
11
ESE Density and AYP
12
FCAT Reading
13
FCAT Math
14
FCAT Science
15
Needs Assessment Results
16
Preliminary Needs Assessment
  • November 2008
  • Identification of training needs of charters
  • Addressed all areas, including ESE
  • n230
  • Top 4 areas identified by schools
  • Instructional strategies, ESE instructional
    strategies, Learning Gains, Accountability

17
Preliminary Needs AssessmentSchool Responses-
ESE (n208)
18
Preliminary Needs AssessmentDistrict Responses
(n22)
19
ESE Needs Assessment (July 09)
  • Second needs assessment
  • Follow up to initial assessment in Nov. 08
  • n94

20
Demographics of Respondents
21
ESE Support from Sponsor of respondents
answered meets or exceeds expectations
22
Schools 3 Most Urgent Training Needs(available
responses)
23
Training Needs of respondents indicating need
24
Training Needs- High Density
25
Rules and Regulations
26
State Statutes Eligible Students
  • Students with disabilities and students served in
    English for Speakers of Other Languages programs
    shall have an equal opportunity of being selected
    for enrollment in a charter school. (s.
    1002.33(10)(f), F.S.)

27
State Statute Enrollment Preference
  • A charter school may limit the enrollment process
    to target, Students considered at risk of
    dropping out of school or academic failure. Such
    students shall include exceptional education
    students. (s. 1002.33(10)(e)2, F.S.)

28
State Statute Exemptions
  • A charter school shall operate in accordance with
    its charter and shall be exempt from all statutes
    in chapters 1000-1013. However, a charter school
    shall be in compliance with the following
    statutes in chapters 1000-1013
  • Those statutes pertaining to the provision of
    services to students with disabilities. (s.
    1002.33(16)(a)3, F.S.)

29
State Statute Sponsor Services
  • A sponsor shall provide certain administrative
    and educational services to charter schools.
    These services shall include contract management
    services full-time equivalent and data reporting
    services exceptional student education
    administration services (s. 1002.33(20), F.S.)

30
State Statute Funding
  • If the district school board is providing
    programs or services to students funded by
    federal funds, any eligible students enrolled in
    charter schools in the school district shall be
    provided federal funds for the same level of
    service provided students in the schools operated
    by the district school board. (s. 1002.33(17)(c),
    F.S.)

31
State Statute ARRA
  • Charter schools shall be included by the
    Department of Education and the district school
    board in requests for federal stimulus funds in
    the same manner as district school board-operated
    public schools, including Title I and IDEA funds
    and shall be entitled to receive such funds. (s.
    1002.33(17)(d), F.S.)

32
State Statute Funding
  • District school boards shall make timely and
    efficient payment and reimbursement to charter
    schools, including processing paperwork required
    to access special state and federal funding for
    which they may be eligibleThe payment shall be
    issued no later than 10 working days after the
    district school board receives a distribution of
    state or federal funds. (s. 1002.33(17)(e), F.S.)

33
IDEA- Charter Responsibilities
  • Rights of children with disabilities. Children
    with disabilities who attend public charter
    schools and their parents retain all rights under
    this part.

34
IDEA LEA responsibilities
  • Serve students in same manner as its traditional
    public school students.
  • Including supplementary and related services on
    site at charter school.
  • Provide IDEA funds to charter school on same
    basis as funds are provided to traditional public
    schools.

35
NCLB Title V, Part B
  • Federal definition of charter school includes a
    requirement that a charter school, complies with
    the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, title VI of
    the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of the
    Education Amendments of 1972, section 504 of the
    Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and part B of the
    Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

36
Current Issues
37
Current Issues
  • Discrimination
  • Lack of Expertise
  • Lack of Clarity in Law
  • Funding Disparities

38
Discrimination- Research
  • Historically, percentage of students receiving
    special education services has been smaller in
    public charter schools than in traditional
    schools. (Estes, 2000, 2001 Rhim McLaughlin,
    1999 USDOE, 1997 USDOE, 2000)

39
Discrimination- Research
  • Charter schools may counsel out students with
    significant disabilities (Estes, 2003)
  • Charter schools may discourage students with
    disabilities from enrolling (Fiore, et. al, 2000)

40
Florida Data
41
Florida Data
42
Florida Data
  • 18 charter schools with 0 ESE enrollment
  • Avg. total enrollment for these schools is 28
  • Incubator schools/schools within school

43
Finding the average school
44
Comparison of Average School
45
Discussion
  • Florida charter schools enroll less SWD than
    traditional.
  • SWD in charters tend to perform well.
  • State and federal law clearly prohibit
    discrimination
  • Model application and contract further clarify
    prohibitions

46
Expertise- Research
  • Lack of expertise at charter schools may hinder
    the implementation of programming for students
    with special needs (Estes, 2000, 2001 Glascock
    et al., 1997 Lange, 1997 McLaughlin
    Henderson, 1998 Vernal, 1995).
  • Education Commission of the States (1995) found
    that charter directors in seven states felt
    unprepared to accept students with disabilities.
  • Some charter schools do not have a formal plan in
    place to serve SWD at time of opening (Lange,
    1997)

47
Expertise- Research
  • Research tends to focus on the expertise of
    charter school leadership.
  • No data on Floridas charter school leadership
    expertise in ESE
  • Data available on HQT percentages

48
Expertise
  • Data reviewed
  • ESE classes that are NCLB core course
  • Taught by HQT or NHQT

49
Expertise- Data
50
Expertise- Discussion
  • Large gap in HQT (14)
  • Reasons?
  • Solutions?

51
Statutory Clarity
  • April 1995 Only 4 of 12 state charter laws
    mentioned special education (Szabo Gerber,
    1996)
  • Review of 41 charter laws in 2007 revealed that
    few of the existing charter school laws and
    regulations resolve or provide clarity regarding
    the myriad of issues related to educating
    students with disabilities in charter schools.
    (Rhim et al., 2007)

52
Statutory Clarity
  • the roots of the choice movement, which emerged
    as one of the many reforms conceptualized amidst
    the panic triggered by A Nation at Risk. The
    purpose of such reforms was to raise the bar of
    academic achievement in order for the nation to
    compete in a global economy. As a result,
    students with disabilities may have been an
    afterthought to the movement. (Estes, 2004)

53
Statutory Tension
  • Whereas charter schools seek to eliminate or
    reduce bureaucracy to provide students and their
    families with an appropriate educational
    environment, special education seeks to ensure a
    free and appropriate public education for all
    students through legislative regulation. (Lange
    Lehr, 2000)

54
Florida Statutory Issue
  • Lack of clarity on responsibilities of LEA and
    charter school.
  • Providing services/funding under IDEA
  • ESE administration services
  • Lack of clarity surrounding reasonable academic
    standards and Students with disabilitiesshall
    have an equal opportunity of being selected for
    enrollment in a charter school.

55
Efforts to Clarify
  • Model Application
  • Model Contract

56
Funding Disparities
57
Funding Disparities
  • National Average
  • 10,771 per pupil (traditional public)
  • 6,585 per pupil (charter)
  • Florida Averages
  • 9,542 per pupil (traditional public)
  • 6,552 per pupil (charter)
  • Center for Education Reform (2006 data)

58
Funding Disparities (Thomas B. Fordham Institute,
2005)
  • 7,831 per pupil (traditional public)
  • 6,936 per pupil (charter)
  • - 11.4 difference

59
ESE Impact Example
  • Decreases in funding can have disproportionate
    effect on schools with higher numbers of 254-255
    students.

60
Conclusions
61
Where we are
  • Performance generally positive with room for
    improvement.
  • Needs RtI, Differentiated Instruction
  • Sponsor Support Generally meets expectations
  • Rules and Regs Lack of clarity

62
Where we are (cont)
  • Issues
  • Discrimination not apparent, but equal
    representation not achieved
  • Expertise HQT percentages low, need to assess
    expertise of charter leadership
  • Lack of clarity in law- no bright line guidance
  • Funding disparity- charters funded at lower
    levels

63
Where do we go next?
  • Performance and Training Needs
  • Department
  • Training and TA
  • Supporting sponsors
  • Sponsor
  • Include charters in all PD opportunities

64
Where do we go next?
  • Rules and Regs
  • Department
  • Model Application
  • Model Contract
  • Sponsor
  • Include specifics in contract (ESE
    admininstrative services)
  • Clearly define how IDEA funds will be used
  • Include charters in development of IDEA
    application

65
Where do we go next?
  • Communication

66
Thank you
  • Contact Information
  • Adam Miller
  • 850-245-0998
  • Adam.Miller_at_fldoe.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com