Drug Development and Assessment in Man Pharmaceutical Medicine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Drug Development and Assessment in Man Pharmaceutical Medicine

Description:

... Pharmacokinetics Pharmacodynamics Pharmaceutical development Pharmacovigilance Pharmacoeconomics Pharmacoepidemiology Pharmaceutical Process Is the drug ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:289
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: jst88
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Drug Development and Assessment in Man Pharmaceutical Medicine


1
Drug Development and Assessment in
ManPharmaceutical Medicine
  • Thursday 22nd March 2007
  • Dr John Stinson

2
An expert is somebody who is more than 50 miles
from home, has no responsibility for implementing
the advice he gives, and shows slides. E
dwin Meese
3
What do Doctors Do?
  • Diagnose and treat
  • Cost of diagnosing
  • What do we cure?
  • What do we alleviate?
  • How do we achieve these effects?
  • Who makes medicines?
  • Future threats?

4
Antibiotic Resistance
  • 1937 Sulphonamides
  • 1944 Penicillin
  • 1947 Cephalosporins
  • 1947 Chloramphenicol
  • 1947 Aminoglycosides
  • 1952 Macrolides
  • 1953 Tetracyclines
  • 1956 Glycopeptides
  • 1960 Flucloxacillin
  • 1961 Rifampicin
  • 1962 Fusidic Acid
  • 1970 Trimethoprim
  • 1975 Carbipenems
  • 1982 Fluoroquinolones
  • A new class of antibiotic every 3 years
  • 18 year gap to 2000

5
Introduction
  • 1935 Few effective Medicines
  • lt1950 No antihypertensive agents
  • 1950s Diuretics
  • 1960s B2 Receptor antagonists
  • 1970s Calcium Channel antagonists
  • 1980s ACE Inhibitors
  • 1990s Angiotensin II receptor antagonist
  • BNF 2004 gt 100 antihypertensives

6
  • Before 1960 Random screening and empirical
    drug design i.e. LUCK!
  • 1960s
  • Medicinal Chemistry Better organic
    Biochemistry Mass spectroscopy NMR
    developments

7
  • 1970s Receptor Science Agonists/Antagonists
  • 1980s Protein Chemistry Enzyme
    Chemistry Inhibitors of Enzymes
  • 1990s Molecular Biology
  • Gene Therapy Biopharmacuticals

8
Receptor Science Discovered Medicines
  • Receptor Agonist/Antagonist Disease
  • Benzodiazepine Diazepam Epilepsy,
    Anxiety Sedation
  • Opiate Morphine Analgesia
  • B2 Salbutamol Asthma
  • B1 B2 Propanolol Hypertension
  • H2 Cimetidine Peptic Ulceration
  • Dopamine Levodopa Parkinsonism
  • 5HT Ondansetron Emesis
  • AII Losartan Hypertension

9
Non Peptide Enzyme Inhibitors
  • Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy
  • ACE Captopril Hypertension
  • HMG CoA Simvastatin Hi Cholesterol
  • DHFR Trimethoprim Antibacterial
  • b-lactamase Clavulinic acid Antibiotic Adjunc
  • 14 a lactamase Ketoconazole Antifungal

10
(No Transcript)
11
Molecules Registered in Libraries
  • Screened in biological systems
  • gt100,000 molecules screened
  • Automated systems
  • Intelligent screening using 3-D structures
  • Molecule Receptor Binding
  • Appropriate shaped molecule tried

12
Potential Drug Candidate
  • More intensely assessed for activity
  • As it passes more hurdles
  • Proceed into toxicology testing
  • Now considered a New Chemical Entity
  • NCE

13
New Chemical Entity
  • What route of administration? Parenteral
  • Oral
  • Transcutaneous
  • Subcutaneous
  • Inhalation
  • Rectal
  • Eye
  • Buccal

14
NCE Formulation
  • Tablet
  • Suspension
  • Solution
  • Capsule
  • Enteric coated
  • Cream
  • Ointment
  • Pro-drug?

15
Route of Synthesis?
  • Economics (platinum)
  • Which Salt? Hydrocortisone mild
    steroid Hydrocortisone butyrate potent
  • Solubility
  • Physicochemical properties
  • Stability
  • Compatibility with excipients

16
Clinical Pharmacology
  • The Scientific basis of drug therapy,
    includes Pharmacokinetics Pharmacodynam
    ics Pharmaceutical development Pharmacovigil
    ance Pharmacoeconomics Pharmacoepidemiology

17
Pharmaceutical Process
  • Is the drug getting into the patient? Rout
    e? Formulation? Dissolution? Absor
    ption?

18
Pharmacokinetic Process
  • Is the drug getting to its site of
    action? Absorption? Distribution?
    Metabolism? Excretion?

19
Pharmacodynamic Therapeutic Process
  • Is the drug producing the required
    pharmacological effect?
  • Is the pharmacological effect being translated
    into a therapeutic effect?

20
Phase 1 Trials
  • Initial studies in man to determine tolerance and
    the safe dosage range and to give indication of
    metabolic handling. These studies are usually
    undertaken with healthy volunteers but may be
    extended to include patients. Pharmacokinetic
    (ADME) and pharmacodynamic activities are
    measured if possible.
  • N 30-80

21
Phase II Trials
  • Early controlled trials in a limited number of
    patients (with the disease) under closely
    monitored conditions to show efficacy and short
    term safety.
  • Humans exposed 250-500

22
Phase III Trials
  • Extended large-scale trials to obtain additional
    evidence of efficacy and safety, and definition
    of most common adverse effects. Longer term
    trials possible
  • Humans exposed 300 - 10,000

23
Phase IV Trials
  • These are performed after the medicine has been
    licensed and marketed. Post-marketing
    surveillance occurs after the clinical trials
    programme is complete. It is used to collect
    adverse event data from a large patient
    population.
  • Humans exposed 10,000

24
When Phase I to III Complete
  • Apply for Product Licence or authorisation
  • From FDA
  • From EMEA
  • From National authority (IMB etc)
  • Decision based on Safety Data Efficacy
    Data Pharmaceutical Quality

25
Pharmacovigilance
  • Sulfanilamide one of first antibiotics
  • Effective against streptococcal infections
  • Not under patent protection (1908)
  • Many manufacturers marketed it
  • A small company decided to produce a liquid
    formulation
  • Found that diethylene glycol was a suitable
    solvent

26
Pharmacovigilance
  • Raspberry tasting elixir of sulfanilamide
  • 72 diethylene glycol, 16 water, 10
    sulfanilamide
  • Control laboratory found it suitable with
    regards to appearance, flavour and flagrance.
  • There was no toxicity testing of the ingredients

27
Pharmacovigilance
  • 105 patients died (out of 353 treated)
  • A mass poisoning
  • The only rule broken by the manufacturer, the
    Massengill Company, was that it called the
    product an elixir although it did not contain
    ethanol!
  • The FDA changed the law
  • Manufacturers had to prove safety before
    marketing a medicine.

28
Toxicology Testing
  • Thalidomide 1956 Germany Antiemetic in pregnancy
  • 1961 Reports of Phocomelia no cases in
    1949-1959 477 cases in 1961 alone 400-500
    cases in UK 1959-61
  • 1963 CSM in UK
  • 1968 Medicines Act UK Regulatory Control

29
Pharmacovigilance
  • Thalidomide was not approved in US
  • However studies were undertaken in US
  • 624 Pregnant women received thalidomide
  • 10 cases of Phocomelia occurred
  • FDA tightened rules to all stages of drug
    development
  • This required extensive testing in animals first

30
Before NCE tested in Man
  • Safety Pharmacology in Animals DogRat CNS
    Activity CVS Activity Respiratory
    Activity
  • Pharmacokinetics Dog Rat usually Absorption
    Distribution Metabolism Excretion

31
Before NCE tested in Man
  • Acute Toxicity single dose 2 Species of
    animlas by 2 routes Usually IV and Oral (or
    proposed route) Maximum well tolerated dose
  • Repeat dose toxicity Rodent and
    non-rodent Using route proposed for
    man Duration depends on proposed duration in
    man

32
Before NCE tested in Man
  • Genotoxicity Ames Test- bacteria gene
    mutation S.Typhi, E.Coli
  • Mouse Lymphoma Cell line
    mammalian gene mutation Chinese Hamster Ovary
    chromosomal damage Micronucle
    us Test mammalian in vitro chromosome
    damage Assay of DNA synthesis in rat liver
  • Reproductive toxicity only if women of child
    bearing potential

33
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting
34
Pharmacovigilance
  • When a new medicine gets a licence
  • On average about 4,000 humans have received it in
    trials
  • Many have only received it for a short time
  • If an adverse event only occurs in 1 5,000
  • No chance to detect it
  • Especially if it occurs rarely in background
  • Pharmacovigilance only starts with licence

35
(No Transcript)
36
VIOXX Rofecoxib
  • MSD COX 2 inhibitor
  • In theory less risk of GI bleeds
  • Approved by FDA in 1999
  • 2,500,000,000 per year
  • VIGOR study RR 5 x of AMI compared to
    naproxen
  • FDA estimate 27,000 excess AMI/deaths between
    1999-2003

37
VIOXX
  • APPROVe study
  • Study in preventing colonic polyps
  • Showed increased CV deaths
  • September 30th 2004 product withdrawn
  • Cost will probably be 9 billion in sales 5
    billion in law suits

38
Bayer statin
  • Statin withdrawn due to rhabdomyolisis
  • Dose response curve not properly explored
  • Could have been avoided?
  • Pharmacovigilance does not stop at licensing,
    indeed it really only starts then

39
Pharmacovigilance Methods
  • Spontaneous Reporting
  • Cohort Studies Defined size group of
    patients Followed for defined period of
    time 10,000 pts recruited from 2500
    GPs Non-promotional, only if going to be
    Rx Doctor reports and ADEs Can come up with
    new ADEs Hypotheses generating

40
Pharmacovigilance Methods
  • Case Control studies
  • Hypothesis testing, not generating Select
    cohort with suspected disease/ADE Select
    larger cohort without ADE Look for differences
    in exposure to drug

41
Pharmacovigilance Methods
  • Computerised databases Prescriptions/Pa
    tients Linked To medical adverse
    events/disease Getting better as I.T.
    improves Depends on quality of data entered

42
The interface between the medical profession and
the pharmaceutical industry
  • Research State funded 25 million/year
  • Research Funded by Pharma 40 million
  • Approx 160 doctors, nurses and scientists are
    funded by pharma industry
  • Used to be area of growth --now ?
  • Fraud rare but does occur

43
(No Transcript)
44
Medicine Promotion
  • Advertisements Strict Guidelines
    safe, best, most etc.
  • reminder vs full advertisement
  • Code of practice Complaints procedure

45
Medicine Promotion
  • Representatives Educational Informative
    Promotional Not paid by
    commission Rising standards Must have data
    sheet Must report ADEs Must not mislead

46
Medicine Promotion
  • S safety
  • T tolerability
  • E efficacy
  • P price

47
Medicine Promotion
  • Samples
  • must be in response to signed dated
    request
  • No more than 6 samples per year
  • Smallest pack available
  • Marked not for resale/free medical sample

48
Medicine Promotion
  • Sponsorship IPHA code of practice (new 6th
    edition) Doctors should not ask for a fee for
    apt Sponsorship should be appropriate not out
    of proportion Sponsored meetings must have
    educational component No sponsorship
    for non-medical people

49
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com