The History of Oil Pipeline Regulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

The History of Oil Pipeline Regulation

Description:

Title: The History of Pipeline Regulation Author: sreed Last modified by: Kathleen Sherman Created Date: 10/14/2001 7:40:21 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:146
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: sre2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The History of Oil Pipeline Regulation


1
The History of Oil Pipeline Regulation
  • Steven Reed
  • Steptoe Johnson LLP
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • May 18, 2004

2
Three Questions
  • How did oil pipelines come to be regulated by the
    federal government?
  • How has federal regulation evolved over time?
  • What does it mean today?

3
Background of U.S.Oil Pipeline Regulation
  • Development of U.S. Oil Industry
  • John D. Rockefeller/Standard Oil
  • 1906 Pivotal Year

4
Origins of the Oil Industry
  • What does Moby Dick have to do with the origins
    of the oil industry?
  • Who was Colonel Edwin Drake?
  • Why does a barrel of oil contain 42 U.S. gallons?
  • Who was Samuel Van Syckel?

5
Standard Oil
  • Founded in 1870 by John D. Rockefeller in
    Cleveland, Ohio
  • Controlled 90 of oil refining and 80 of oil
    transportation markets in U.S.
  • Posted prices
  • Rebates and drawbacks
  • Squeezed out independents

6
Hepburn Act of 1906
  • Brought oil pipelines under Interstate Commerce
    Act of 1887 (originally applied only to
    railroads)
  • President Theodore Roosevelt and Senator Henry
    Cabot Lodge, both Republicans, spearheaded the
    Hepburn Act
  • Enacted rapidly in a climate of public outrage

7
Was this trip necessary?
  • Standard Oil monopoly already threatened by new
    competitors (Gulf, Sun, Texaco, Phillips, etc.)
  • U.S. v. Standard Oil -- antitrust suit to break
    up Rockefeller monopoly (succeeded in 1911)
  • Growth of demand for gasoline and aviation fuel
    as 20th century dawned

8
What did the Hepburn Act cover?
  • Interstate
  • Common Carrier
  • Transportation
  • Of Oil
  • By Pipeline

9
Regulated Activities Under ICA
  • Rates and charges
  • Terms of service (rules and regulations)
  • Form and content of tariffs
  • Accounting (USOA)
  • Reporting (Form 6)
  • Disclosure of shipper information (15(13))

10
What does the ICA leave unregulated?
  • Construction and abandonment of oil pipelines
    (entry and exit)
  • Sales and leases of oil pipeline assets
  • Securities transactions
  • Provision of non-transportation services

11
Contrast Oil Pipeline and Gas Pipeline Regulation
  • OIL PIPELINES
  • Common carriage
  • Unregulated entry and exit
  • Highly competitive
  • Unique regulatory model
  • GAS PIPELINES
  • Public utilities
  • Approval required for construction and
    abandonment
  • Natural monopoly model

12
Oil Pipeline HistoryICC Era 1906-1977
  • Pipeline Cases (1914)
  • ICC Inactivity (1906-1940)
  • Atlantic Refining Consent Decree (1941)
  • ICC Valuation Methodology (1940s)
  • Williams Pipe Line proceeding (1970s)
  • Trans Alaska Pipeline System opens (1977)

13
Oil Pipeline HistoryFERC Era 1977-Present
  • 1977-1985 Failed efforts to regulate
  • 1985 Opinion 154-B
  • 1988 Buckeye market-based rate alternative
  • 1992 Energy Policy Act
  • 1994 FERC rulemaking and adoption of indexing
    methodology

14
1977-1985 Failed Efforts
  • Formation of FERC (Department of Energy
    Organization Act -- 1977)
  • Farmers Union I (D.C. Circuit 1978)
  • Opinion 154, Williams (FERC 1982)
  • American Petrofina Order (FERC 1982)
  • Farmers Union II (D.C. Circuit 1984)

15
1985 Opinion 154-B
  • Opinion 154-B, Williams -- adopted modified
    trended original cost (TOC) methodology for oil
    pipelines
  • Provided for transition rate base between
    valuation and TOC called SRB
  • Intended to be cost-based rate methodology
  • Many details left to individual cases

16
Cost-of-Service Cases
  • ARCO Pipe Line Opinion 351 (FERC 1990)
  • Kuparuk Transportation Company (FERC 1991)
  • Endicott Pipeline Initial Decision (1991)
  • Continued uncertainty about certain elements of
    Opinion 154-B methodology

17
1988 Buckeye market-based rate alternative
  • Buckeye proceeding involved setting cost-based
    rates under Opinion 154-B
  • Dispute arose over disclosure of confidential
    cost information by Buckeye
  • On appeal, FERC ruled Buckeye could obtain
    lighthanded regulation by showing lack of
    significant market power in the relevant markets

18
Market-based Rate Alternative
  • Buckeye rule broadened to all oil pipelines
  • Pipelines originally had an election to defend
    filed rates on market power or cost-of-service
    grounds
  • Lighthanded regulation now understood to mean
    market-based rates
  • Burden is on pipeline to show lack of market power

19
Energy Policy Act of 1992
  • Grandfathered existing rates as of 10/24/92
  • Ordered FERC to develop simplified and generally
    applicable methodology
  • Also required FERC to streamline procedures for
    oil pipeline regulation

20
Conclusion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com